Jump to content

Rolex Submariner Case Opening Issue


clockboy

Recommended Posts

Have problems opening my Rolex submariner case back. It has never been opened before so I think the issue is just very tight. Removed the bezel to clean and it was really,really dirty so I expect this is the issue with the back. I have been trying to open with a opener made by Huaxing but it will not budge and eventually the die slips. I don,t want to do any damage but I don,t know if the die is just a bad fit as it is not a Bergeon or if I need a more substantial opener any one with advise will be most appreciated. 

 

post-234-0-44703100-1421323630_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one of these myself and it's served me well. Have you tried gripping the case across the points of the lugs in fibre vice soft jaws to allow you to exert maximum downward pressure while applying torque? I had to do that with a Tudor Oyster that didn't want to open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Geo, to get a really good purchase I removed the bezel inserted the watch into a watch case holder. However I put downward pressure before twisting with a lot of pressure (more than I like) but no good and eventually the die slips. I was just wondering if the bergeon die is a tighter fit or I need different style of remover. The Bezel was really tight even with a Bezel remover and the dirt under it was substantial so I guess this is the issue. 

I just do not like forcing for fear of damage.

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also have a set of the cloned Bergeon dies and some are OK and some slip - even when I use them in the bergeon bench case opener. 

 

I purchased some Horotec dies (which also fit the Bergeon case opener by the way) and never had a problem since.

 

Do you have a glass lifter (the type with all the prongs)? If so, you can try tightening it round the back and turn. Sometimes works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark, I have a glass lifter (prong type)& will give that a try. If no good I will look at Horotec dies perhaps. I presume I can get them in Cousins. I just have a feeling to shift its going to require a pro type tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be time for the supa glue and a 19mm nut!!.. :startle: ....its never failed me......then tighten back up with the die if you can. A few weeks back I did just that on my Breitling asI wasn't going to spend £50 for a die and it worked fine. I have the same set of dies you have and they worked fine on my Sub but it had been serviced before so not on as tight as I expected.

Edited by ash145
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely it will. That, and it's Bergeon (5700, my one) brother are extremely good tools. The good thing is you will get dies for Rolex, Panerai, Baume & Mercier and Breitling to fit. If you have the budget, its a no-brainer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry I'm late for this thread! (clockboy just pressed the button!) but the opener Geo recommends is excellent, (I just got one for Christmas) if it is the original LG. The down side is they only come with the Rolex dice! In any case, I also got a Witschi opener that accepts Horotec and Bergeon parts!

 

It is here: http://www.ofrei.com/page557.html#27092

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a set exactly the same Chinese back opener set that Clockboy was using and it's worked very well with both my vintage Rolex and Tudor. The only case it wouldn't open so far was a Chinese copy Rolex.

Edited by Geo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New toy arrived added pic. Opening the rolex case with the Horotec was simple with no effort.  

Conversation "whats that dear"  ------ "Oh just a tool for my watches" ---- "how much "  ,

"no nothing really, only a few quid dear "  :D

 

 

post-234-0-52280800-1421680616_thumb.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See, what has happen is a normal consequece of the reducing the hammer size and changing it's shape by the removing metal from it. But here the hammer is adjustable and just adjustment is needed to correct, and this is what You have done. There is a rule for the adjustment and it is that the hammer must lay firmly on the seconds counter heart and there should be a litle free play in the same time of the minutes counter heart/hammer which alows counter movement of about 0.5 min on the small dial hand (+/- 0.25). Of course, there is no way to make one hammer to delay from the other, as they are one single part. What has changed too is the slope of the hammer head and thus the orientation of the heart has changed, and thus the switching finger position. This led to need of the finger position correction. The rule here is that switching of the minute counter has to start when the seconds counter hand is on '59'. Of course, the seconds hand must be positioned as so the resetting is at '0' exactly. If switching is earlier than 59, there will be no problem, but it will be wrong as reading can be not correct. If the switching starts later, the problems that You described can happen.
    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
×
×
  • Create New...