Jump to content

Roger Smith's Heating Apparatus


SparkyLB

Recommended Posts

I'm watching the 10-part "Hand Finishing" series of videos for the 50th or so time; something of which I can't seem to get enough.  Would the forum be so kind and tell me what the white honeycomb-looking mineral(?) is that he uses to protect his table from the heat of his torch? 

I know bricks would work fine, but I'm curious.  If it's available to me, I'm going to acquire some. 

I'm going to give hands a try. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I haven't seen the video but there used to be asbestos pads for torch work which were replaced by another mineral later on. He probably has an old school asbestos pad or modern equivalent.

Thank you, nickelsilver. 

In case you're interested, it's at 50 seconds in.  Don't blame me if you become attached to these 10 short videos!  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked how he heated a brass block to indirectly blue the hands. I also appreciated it when he admitted to not getting the colour correct on one of the hands. That’s always a bummer. I think you’d be more likely to get consistent heating by using brass filings, but the visibility is inferior compared to his method. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rodabod said:

I liked how he heated a brass block to indirectly blue the hands. I also appreciated it when he admitted to not getting the colour correct on one of the hands. That’s always a bummer. I think you’d be more likely to get consistent heating by using brass filings, but the visibility is inferior compared to his method. 

Agreed, since is not as efficient holding onto heat as cast iron or copper; there's more of a gradient.  This would cause brass heated from one side to always be much hotter where the flame is.  I like how Roger never brings flame close to metal to be blued.  Seems that Roger Smith's intention is to move the piece about such that the finished product can be as uniform as possible.  He admits the improbability of bluing 3 hands identically.  It's a learned skill, but what isn't? 

As for the bed of shavings offering inferior visibility, this seems like a large part of the equation.  If you watch, the color starts on the bottom and rises quite fast to the top.  If embedded in shavings, one might very easily miss this transition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my horology tutors used to blue steel over a naked flame. I can’t remember the correct term for it, but he was very good at it. The key is to be very gradual, so you sweep through quickly so that the colour doesn’t progress much at a time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe bluing of parts etc was done over a spirit lamp aka  Donald De Carles book , as its easier to control the process.  Some years ago I watched a TV programme on Roger Smith from his workshop on the Isle of Man  the  man is a Genius in the watch making world , Hand build chronometers brilliant.

As regards the heat pads  There used to be asbestos from storage heaters, the modern ones Fischer I believe use the ceramic pads so a source there if you are looking for some, but keep the asbestos bagged up and dampen before use. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's very interesting information. I haven't tried to see if my bombé jewel holes have olive holes but I think I should be able to tell on the larger jewels at least. See if I get a chance to have a look later today. This little story was very comforting to read for a "bungler" like myself. That success isn't a given even for a pro. Thanks for sharing!
    • I forgot that I said I would do that. Will take some tomorrow and post them up post haste.
    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
×
×
  • Create New...