Jump to content

Real or fake?


Recommended Posts

Hey was just looking at some watches online and just stumbled across this 'Rolex' and 'omega' I thought they looked a bit fake but wasn't sure about how genuine they were. The omega had some sort of tag but I couldn't identify  it however looked fairly decent

The listing said that it was there uncles and that they didnt know anything about them and when contacted repeated this and wouldn't take any more or higher quality pics

(Sorry for the low quality images they aren't mine)

Screenshot_20200131-223619_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223630_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223638_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223654_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223703_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223714_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-224506_eBay.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dylan123 said:

The listing said that it was there uncles and that they didnt know anything about them and when contacted repeated this and wouldn't take any more or higher quality pics

Which says it all. In my opinion:

  • Learn on, or repair "for human cause" a fake watch which was passed to you: No problem.
  • Document how poorly or good they are made: Useful and interesting to read.
  • Defend counterfeiting with some convoluted reasoning, or wear them: Just opinions, or matter of (poor) taste.
  • Go out and willingly buy a fake watch: Hmmmm. Not to mention that is better not to let grow an illusion that it may be genuine after all. Buy an honest and modest watch with the same money - actually is not little money sometime.
  • Deceive a buyer as claiming or otherwise acting as if it's genuine: Crime of fraud.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me think..

Scenario one  "uncle" had a genuine Omega, AND a genuine Rolex, and treated them like junk.

Scenario two  "uncle" had a fake Omega, AND a fake Rolex, and treated them like junk.

If I owned them, and they were genuine,  I'd keep them in the best of order, in their original boxes (*).

As it happens I have a similar "Faux-mega" in my junk box.

 

 

* Actually I'd probably flog them, original boxes included, and buy something else that I would enjoy even more... but you get my point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dylan123 said:

 

Didnt have a starting price, just thought it was interesting seeing as someone bidded £150 straight away meaning they thought this collection had some worth. 

Can be a baiting bid, or

"a fool and his money are soon parted" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi I think jdm is very close.   I read an article where some dealers have a pal and when they put up articles for sale the pal puts in a bid(baiting bid) which attacts others but if its a (sale)  It does not reach the price required it pulled and no goods change hands and the article is again punted at a later date. One has to be carefull.  jdm's quote is a word to the wise.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Let me think..

Scenario one  "uncle" had a genuine Omega, AND a genuine Rolex, and treated them like junk.

Scenario two  "uncle" had a fake Omega, AND a fake Rolex, and treated them like junk.

If I owned them, and they were genuine,  I'd keep them in the best of order, in their original boxes (*).

As it happens I have a similar "Faux-mega" in my junk box.

 

 

* Actually I'd probably flog them, original boxes included, and buy something else that I would enjoy even more... but you get my point.

Yh agree with you there the Rolex looked kinda dodgy but omega looked pretty interesting also noted that rotary Guarantee that looked wierd because if someone was buying legit rotaries then you would think they wouldnt be in the mindset of fakes but whatever I guess. Also possible (but unlikely) that the box was somewhere else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rolex is definitely fake. The Omega I couldn't swear to it but I'd bet you it was.

As per AndyHull, no one, literally no one treats a luxury watch like those, i.e. thrown in a drawer rattling around getting scratched.

EVERYONE the seller included has heard of (at least the first one) Rolex and Omega and if they honestly thought they were genuine would have had them checked.

I don't even know if they make a two Tone yachtmaster but if so. That's several thousand in that one alone if it were genuine. Which it most assuredly isn't. (That sticker for one thing alone)

There'll always be someone willing to chance bidding to stumble across that mythical genuine old watch of uncle Fred's that's worth a fortune, but every instance I've ever heard of has been second third fourth or fifth hand and almost certainly allegorical.

The fact they won't take more pics tells you all you need to know anyway.

That pocket watch might be interesting though. But I certainly wouldn't be bidding much over £20 per piece maximum on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, m1ks said:

The Rolex is definitely fake. The Omega I couldn't swear to it but I'd bet you it was.

As per AndyHull, no one, literally no one treats a luxury watch like those, i.e. thrown in a drawer rattling around getting scratched.

EVERYONE the seller included has heard of (at least the first one) Rolex and Omega and if they honestly thought they were genuine would have had them checked.

I don't even know if they make a two Tone yachtmaster but if so. That's several thousand in that one alone if it were genuine. Which it most assuredly isn't. (That sticker for one thing alone)

There'll always be someone willing to chance bidding to stumble across that mythical genuine old watch of uncle Fred's that's worth a fortune, but every instance I've ever heard of has been second third fourth or fifth hand and almost certainly allegorical.

The fact they won't take more pics tells you all you need to know anyway.

That pocket watch might be interesting though. But I certainly wouldn't be bidding much over £20 per piece maximum on that.

Thanks agree with you there. Just think it's strange how people shroud watches in mystery and that they know 'absolutely nothing about anything' in general as well if I was selling anything in fact a few google searches would tell you for 99% of things what they were and whether they are genuine. Just a different thought process I guess. Most people would probably get excited when they see a rolex not just stick it on some ebay auction.

Saying that I do like bidding on these type of things providing that the surrounding things can make up the value. Like a lottery really in a million chance of a win but worth it for the excitement. Theres a time and place for vintage Rolex's and its definitely not shoddy ebay auctions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...