Jump to content

Help identifying movement


Nikia

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone! Nicola’s here. Today I’m working on a pocket watch that my grandpa gave me, he said the watch doesn’t wind up. As soon as I opened it, I noticed the click spring on the ratchet wheel stop was missing. I still have to dismantle the movement and check out where the little guy went, however the movement wasn’t running so fingers crossed it hasn’t caused any damage.

 

I just ordered a mega assortment of click springs, hope I can adapt one of those.

 

Can anybody chime in and help me identify this movement? It doesn’t seem to have any markings on the mainplate.

It’s from a “index” pocket watch.

Here to the pic:

 

6e102e6cb52773c050bf78d990d6f913.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uggghh i feel your pain, these swiss pocket watches can be difficult to identify. I know index was a micro brand from the West End SA watch company in switzerland, (which introduced the first incabloc in 1934) not to be confused with the West End watch CO. from Pennsylvania USA. Depending on dating this could be an FHF movement since thats what they were known to use up until the 60s when ETA became a big player. It is an incabloc so we can note its no older than 1934 and no newer than 1960. So safe to say this an FHF most likely from the 50s based on its design.

https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/fontainemelon.php

here is some info on fontainmelon (FHF). Did you look on the dial side to see if you can see the logo, that is normally where you would find them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FHF did make movements with some pretty angular bridges and that's some great info from @saswatch88 on Index but we might have a non-Swiss company using the same brand name here as I'd agree with @rogart63 on the Chinese origin. Here's such a Shanghai movement that looks similar: https://17jewels.info/movements/s/shanghai/shanghai-zse/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

FHF did make movements with some pretty angular bridges and that's some great info from @saswatch88 on Index but we might have a non-Swiss company using the same brand name here as I'd agree with @rogart63 on the Chinese origin. Here's such a Shanghai movement that looks similar: https://17jewels.info/movements/s/shanghai/shanghai-zse/

I was initially going to say it could be chinese. And i would agree that would be the case if you cant find any FHF markings anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Nikia said:

 

Hi everyone! Nicola’s here. Today I’m working on a pocket watch that my grandpa gave me, he said the watch doesn’t wind up. As soon as I opened it, I noticed the click spring on the ratchet wheel stop was missing. I still have to dismantle the movement and check out where the little guy went, however the movement wasn’t running so fingers crossed it hasn’t caused any damage.

 

I just ordered a mega assortment of click springs, hope I can adapt one of those.

 

Can anybody chime in and help me identify this movement? It doesn’t seem to have any markings on the mainplate.

It’s from a “index” pocket watch.

Here to the pic:

 

6e102e6cb52773c050bf78d990d6f913.jpg

 

To assist with a search the size in Ligne and a pic of the keyless side really helps to narrow down the hunt. Also be aware there were a lot of pocket watch manufactures that made pocket watches just to be sold on as un-branded so finding the calibre is really difficult. Ie I recently repaired an un-branded Pocket watch that needed a new balance staff and just by luck I found the watch on the net but it was made by Omega. I purchased the Omega balance and it fitted perfectly so job done. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the part . Found an old Breitling fake watch. The setting lever looks the same and so does the balance bridge. It's an automatic movement . But it has the click and click spring intact. If you want it send me a PM 

DSC09859.JPG

DSC09858.JPG

DSC09857.JPG

Edited by rogart63
pictures
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you sir! This forum really is a resource :)
I managed to adapt a spring I found in another movement I had for spares, stripped the movement, cleaned and oiled. Seems it works nicely now, however looks like I’m unable to adjust the beat error lower than this.
I guess I can live with that, as the movement is a cheap chinese 17 jewels!
6d78c7e3e7d5aebc0df483e9e263d178.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...