Jump to content

Landeron 248 stopping when chrono function in use.


JONICURN

Recommended Posts

Recently serviced a Landeron 248 and I'm getting 40+ hr power reserve.  Seeing an lower amplitudes of 250 chrono off and 220 chrono on.  New mainspring.  I get full, accurate 40+ hrs when chrono is not activated and between 15min and 2hrs when chrono is activated before movement stops.  Resetting or stopping chrono allows balance to start back up again.  Every time the movement stops, the chrono seconds hand is at 12.  Seems just not enough power to keep advancing the minute recording wheel.   I still feel this new mainspring is the culprit - not giving enough power.  What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its about the mainspring but the area of the minute recorder. So I would check everything here:

- recorder spring too much tension?

- both bearings (minute recorder and gear) absolutly clean, not oiled and turning freely if blown with a blower

- engagement of finger to gear and gear to minute recorder calibrated correctly by the excenters?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/23/2020 at 7:11 AM, Delgetti said:

I don't think its about the mainspring but the area of the minute recorder. So I would check everything here:

- recorder spring too much tension?

- both bearings (minute recorder and gear) absolutly clean, not oiled and turning freely if blown with a blower

- engagement of finger to gear and gear to minute recorder calibrated correctly by the excenters?

Good advice so here's what I did:  removed the minute recorder jumper spring - movement stopped.  Removed minute recording wheel - movement stopped, disengaged sliding gear - movement stopped, Tonight I removed chrono wheel so I will see tomorrow if it stopped again.  Though I doubt it will because as long as chrono function was not in use, movement never stopped.  Never applied any lubricant to chrono or minute pivots or chrono tension spring.  Minute recording wheel and sliding gear both would spin freely with puff of air prior to removal.  Do notice amplitude of 188 at full wind during chrono engagement.  Still stumped.  Thanks so much for your help though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, ok, as you mentioned 220 Amp with chrono running I didn't think about this area.

 

So here are more candidates:

- remove chrono runner friction spring nd observe amp (to check if tension was too high)

- check engagement of driving wheel-clutch wheel-chrono runner (if its too high and teeth are touching the opposite wheels ground amp will collapse). Do the check with the chrono running for a whole minute in case not all the wheels are 100% concentric.

 

I think you already checked that all bearings are absolutely clean and no teeth are damaged (esp on the runner).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chrono tension spring was decreased, checked,  and also removed with no improvement.   Adjusted eccentric on coupling clutch to go from 30% tooth depth to 70% with no improvement.  No damaged teeth noted and bearings are clean.   Clutch wheel also spins with air puff.  Thinking of just getting another Landeron 248, servicing it and swapping chrono parts out one by one just to find fault.   I appreciate all the help immensely and any new thoughts are greatly appreciated.  :pulling-hair-out:

Edited by JONICURN
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the update, interesting problem.

But I still didn't understand at which point the drop of amplitude occurs.

Coupling clutch is out of the movement -> movement runs with about 250 amp, right?

Coupling clutch is in the movement, chrono function is activated, chrono runner is out -> movement runs with about 250 amp, right?

And so on, part by part. At which point of this reassembly part by part does the amplitude drop to 188?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had one interesting problem with a landeron 148 . The chronograph hand  was either to long or to thick in the tube. If i pressed it on to tight the chronograph stopped . I changed to an other hand and it worked fine. Don't now if this help . As i don't know if you have the hands on . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2020 at 5:06 PM, rogart63 said:

I have had one interesting problem with a landeron 148 . The chronograph hand  was either to long or to thick in the tube. If i pressed it on to tight the chronograph stopped . I changed to an other hand and it worked fine. Don't now if this help . As i don't know if you have the hands on . 

Thanks for the input.  I questioned that myself so I removed all 5 hands and it didn't help

.  

Edited by JONICURN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2020 at 1:54 AM, Delgetti said:

Thanks for the update, interesting problem.

But I still didn't understand at which point the drop of amplitude occurs.

Coupling clutch is out of the movement -> movement runs with about 250 amp, right?

Coupling clutch is in the movement, chrono function is activated, chrono runner is out -> movement runs with about 250 amp, right?

And so on, part by part. At which point of this reassembly part by part does the amplitude drop to 188?

 

As for the 188 Amplitude, I don't know why it was so low that day.  I did what you said with removing and adding back chrono gears to see where the drop in amplitude was.  See photos.  The movement still stops in chrono mode and still anywhere by 10min and 90 min of chrono usage. Timegrapher set with 42 degrees lift angle. 

0202200007~3.jpg

0202200009~2.jpg

0202200021~2.jpg

0202200035~2.jpg

0202200037~2.jpg

0202200040~2.jpg

0202200042~2.jpg

Edited by JONICURN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to satisfy my curiosity i am thinking of upgrading the mainspring strength but i'm concerned about rebanking. Standard mainspring size for Landeron 248 is 1.35 x 12.0 x 0.14 x 360mm which is what i used in replacement,   While maintaining a 1.35 width, if wanted to improve amplitude, what would be too thick causing concern for rebanking?  Ofrei offers higher strengths of  0.145mm and 0.16mm.

Edited by JONICURN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JONICURN said:

Just to satisfy my curiosity i am thinking of upgrading the mainspring strength but i'm concerned about rebanking. Standard mainspring size for Landeron 248 is 1.35 x 12.0 x 0.14 x 360mm which is what i used in replacement,   While maintaining a 1.35 width, if wanted to improve amplitude, what would be too thick causing concern for rebanking?  Ofrei offers higher strengths of  0.145mm and 0.16mm.

Your problem isn't the mainspring. However, if you really want to increase the strength I would suggest going to 0.13 thick maximum. Going higher will almost certainly cause rebanking and you will lose power reserve and cause undue stress and wear on the gear train as well.

 

I am fairly convinced that you do have one or more damaged teeth either in the chrono runner or the clutch wheel or both. More likely is the chrono runner. That your problem is consistently with the chrono runner at 12h; this is the position that the coupling clutch engages the chrono from zero and the most likely to exhibit wear or damage. The damage can be very very small, and function OK, until it finds a tooth on the clutch wheel it doesn't like and then bang you're stopped. Just a tiny burr will suffice.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Your problem isn't the mainspring. However, if you really want to increase the strength I would suggest going to 0.13 thick maximum. Going higher will almost certainly cause rebanking and you will lose power reserve and cause undue stress and wear on the gear train as well.

 

I am fairly convinced that you do have one or more damaged teeth either in the chrono runner or the clutch wheel or both. More likely is the chrono runner. That your problem is consistently with the chrono runner at 12h; this is the position that the coupling clutch engages the chrono from zero and the most likely to exhibit wear or damage. The damage can be very very small, and function OK, until it finds a tooth on the clutch wheel it doesn't like and then bang you're stopped. Just a tiny burr will suffice.

 

 

Thank you, i will investigate that chrono runner further.  What you said made a lot of sense.   I love this forum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.  Where are you from Wai? 
    • The wire you wrap around a piece of blue pivot steel or what ever high carbon steel to heat it up for hardening? 
    • Hello, I am Wai, new member here. I would like to learn how to restore watch and repair my watch pusher. Thank you
    • Got another one today! It took 10 weeks, but finally arrived. Fairly complete but I added the pivot guage. The burnisher and bow came with the tool. The case is a bit rough and the tool pretty dirty, but trying to decide how much I want to restore.
    • OK, so long story short, I'm working my way through Mark's courses using a "Sea-gul ST36" (or ST3600 from some vendors) AKA an ETA 6497 clone. as a practice piece.  I've had it fully appart and cleaned it, and have had it fully back together an "running", but only briefly as my oil hadn't arrived at the time.  In the course of that work, I saw no markings on the movement that would tell me if it was a true Sea-gul or just a clone of their clone of the original ETA movement. Well, fast forward to this weekend, when my oils arrived in my mailbox and I sat down to try my hand at oiling.  Everything was going swimmingly until I got to the shock setting on the top of the balance cock.  I was able to open the lyre spring without issue, but in attempting to swing the open to access the cap jewel and chaton, I apparently accidentally pressed the launch button as I sent the lyre spring into low earth orbit.  Like most things that make into such orbits it came back down at a place not too far from where it started, but of course that also means that it is no longer in the setting. So my task is now to get said spring back into setting.  What I have read so far tells me that I seem to have two options: Another thread here seems to indicate that the spring came out without taking the balance cock apart, therefore it should go back without the need for that procedure.  That seems a bit pie in the sky for me, but the posts in said thread also gave some high level information about how to get the spring back in (putting it at an angle to the channel cut in the cock and canted so that the tabs fit in the slots, followed by some "wiggling" to get it turned around the right direction.)  I've tried this a couple of times, which have lead to more trips to low earth orbit, but with successful recovery of the orbital vehicle after each trip.  This thread also suggests that what I did to cause the initial launch was to push the spring "back" with more pressure on one side than the other, which put it under tension and caused it to deform out the slot either on one side or at the end (where there is apparently no "back stop".) The other option appears to be varying degrees of disassembly of the balance cock.  Some things I've read suggest that the whole shock setting needs to come out, while other threads here suggest that I only need to remove the regulator arm and the arm carrying the balance stud.  After the last trip the spring made, this is seeming like a better option, but I'm super short on details on how to do what needs to be done.  if I am following correctly: I need to loose the balance spring stud screw so the stud is not held in the arm. I need to somehow disengage the balance spring from the regulator (all the regulators I've seen in videos look nothing like what I see on the balance cock I have.)  What I've seen on the interwebs is a couple of "pins" that the spring passes through.  What I see on my assembly is something that looks more like a single pin with a "V" shaped notch cut in the bottom of it.  The spring is secured in that notch with something that I guessed was glue, Posts here suggest that on some of these movements glue is in fact used.  So I'm trying to figure out how to tell, how to soften dissolve it (I'm guessing IPA or acetone) and how to put it back when I'm done (superglue?  UV glue?) With the spring detached from the cock, I've read that the regulator and stud carrier are basically glorified C clamps around the shock setting and that one removes them by slipping a razor blade under one side of each and prizing them up.  I assume that they go back in the reverse manner like another C clamp, but that again is only a guess.  The place I got this information from seemed to leave that bit out. Once I have one or both arms off the shock setting the above mentioned post seemed to indicate that I could just slide the spring back in the slot, though again, I'm interpolating between the lines I read.  The alternative that I've seen demonstrated on high end movements on Youtube is to remove the entire shock setting and to replace the spring from "underneath" rotating the setting so that spring basically falls into place. I'm not anxious to try this method, as I don't have a jeweling tool to put the shock setting back into place.  That not to mention that the professional watch maker who did the demonstration described "fiddly work." So at the end of the day I'm looking for a little guidance on which pathway to follow, or if I've missed something obvious, a new direction to follow.  If this is a repair that just need to wait until my skills improve I'm totally good with that, I can get another of these movements in relatively short order, I just don't want to treat this one as disposable, and I do want to make an honest effort at fixing it and learning from this experience. Thank you in advance for reading my ramblings and for any suggestions that you might have!
×
×
  • Create New...