Jump to content

remove case back


tomsch

Recommended Posts

It looks like a friction fit pop off back, with the seam around the center line, split across the stem. You will need to have a new single edged razor blade, preferably in a plastic holder to better handle it. Nothing thicker will do it, you would just bang it all up with a screwdriver bit or any other case back tool. Carefully push it into the gap between case back and main case then try angling the blade up to see if it will start the back coming off. You may need to do it in more than one spot to get it going. Don’t be dismayed if you break pieces off of the blade. Just throw it out and grab another one. Hope this helps. It’s just one of many methods that you will have to learn If you work on enough battery powered watches. Steve


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is a slight opening in the center line opposite the stem, at 9 o'clock.  I was able to open that, but that line merely removes the movement, with the back still on it, from the crystal, which remains in the top case.  I think the part that has to be removed is the fine circle that is set in from the edge on the back of the watch.  Is that what you recommend using a razor on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, tomsch said:

there is a slight opening in the center line opposite the stem, at 9 o'clock.  I was able to open that, but that line merely removes the movement, with the back still on it, from the crystal, which remains in the top case.  I think the part that has to be removed is the fine circle that is set in from the edge on the back of the watch.  Is that what you recommend using a razor on?

Take the top part of the case with crystal off and post some good clear close up pics of the bottom part of the case with the movement stuck in it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thank you all for your helpful replies.  Here are pictures, responding to one of the replies, of what I'm dealing with.  separating at the midline removes the movement from the crystal.  The close up of the back shows the disk that has to be removed to access the battery.  There is no opening anywhere along that circle.  I was able to get Chopard to tell me, at least, that it is not a screw on.  Of course they recommend sending it to them for the battery replacement, which I'm sure will cost a couple hundred at least

IMG_1377.jpg

IMG_1378.jpg

IMG_1375.jpg

IMG_1376.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now it looks like you have one where the movement, dial and all is seated in that half of the case. If that is so, you would gently lift up the dial from the 9 area and while turning the crown slowly, see if it doesn’t come out. It will have what is called a split stem, where the stem comes apart via a slot in it. Look up split stems and you will see what I am referring to. Steve


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  Thank you for the pics Looking at the stem tube this looks like a front loader with a split stem. The stem is in two halves and clip into one an other.  As Gpsluvr mentioned look up split stems and you will see what we mean.  The idea is that you remove the half with the crown on and the movement should lift out. Removing the stem one needs to be carefull there are various methods to remove the stem but every one of them requires a straight pull. Again look up how to do it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As already stated this looks like it may well be a split stem in which case a quick note of caution.....

If you use any thing to lever against the case to remove the outer part of the stem make sure you use something between the case and the lever to protect the case. It can be very easy to mar an otherwise good case if you don't, and as yours looks to be a solid gold case the risk is even higher.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i hate split stem cases like this, i would suggest to avoid issues like marring as Marc said, take it to a jeweler and ask them to just remove the movement and thats it, it will cost much less, and then you could do the battery replacement yourself and re-assembling would be much easier than dis assembling.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

watchweasel, yes I'm having fun with it.  Polishing up the case while waiting for the $1.00 battery from Amazon.  
Make: Chopard

Numbers on the back: 340677 and beneath that number, 4103

Inside the case back there are a number of stamps and etchings, including:
LUC (stamped) which Chopard says designates their highest quality in-house work, made only at two locations in Switzerland
750 (stamped) designating gold
this etched at 6:00 o'clock: "MS 10/09/19"
In the center - the Chopard logo image with balance scales beneath it and "750" stamped between the scales
beneath that, "TM 19735" etched.

I wish I could take a nice close of the inside of the case back but it's all to small for anything I have to take pics.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, saswatch88 said:

i hate split stem cases like this, i would suggest to avoid issues like marring as Marc said, take it to a jeweler and ask them to just remove the movement and thats it, it will cost much less, and then you could do the battery replacement yourself and re-assembling would be much easier than dis assembling.

    lots of vintage watches  have the assembly that way with the mvt. fit into the case bottom.  usely a slip fit with a notch for the stem to come out (2 piece stem not rquired.  vin

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vinn3 said:

    lots of vintage watches  have the assembly that way with the mvt. fit into the case bottom.  usely a slip fit with a notch for the stem to come out (2 piece stem not rquired.  vin

 Yes iam familiar with those too, a lot of Waltham/Elgin’s from the late 20s and 30s have cases like that they are much easier to open up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tomsch  The movement looks like an ETA which chopard used , On the outside rim near the coil there should be a number like 955 12 or somthing like can you post it that is the make and calibre of the movement.  Chopard are quite often compared to  Rolex so you have a quality piece there.   cheers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
×
×
  • Create New...