Jump to content

How to Open this Hamilton Electronic?


Recommended Posts

Of course it has a case back. Please get proper tools to work on this nice watch. There are blade type tools to easily open snap type case backs without the risk of damage to the piece or injury to yourself. It is also very possible that you will need a press to close it. Without these it's better to bring it to a good watch shop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see the pic from where I am, but I have a Hamilton electric that I have to pull out the stem (there is a couple that disconnects) and from there take off the crystal and the movement pops out. I believe there is probably a lot of information about taking movements out through the front that is around in a more general sense.

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hamish said:

I can't see the pic from where I am, but I have a Hamilton electric that I have to pull out the stem (there is a couple that disconnects) and from there take off the crystal and the movement pops out. I believe there is probably a lot of information about taking movements out through the front that is around in a more general sense.

 

Cheers

I was thinking this is a front loader.  There is literally no seem anywhere on the back.  So the crown has to come off and then the movement will come out.

 

This is a hamilton "Electronic" . From whagt I understand, it is later then the "Electric" . but finding info is hard because google always wants to give me results for "electric"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, standarsh said:

I was thinking this is a front loader.  There is literally no seem anywhere on the back.  

Actually one can see a small round notch at 9h, there must be a reason for that? 

And assuming it's a front loader, then the crystal must be removed using a lifter (do you have one?) something that may leave some marks on the sides, can you see if there is any? The alternative could be a syringe. 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a 2 piece case like vintage rotarys and some tissot.

You press down the crystal and the front should separate from the back (case  back, movement, dial, crystal, etc.).

Maybe more pictures would be nice from both sides.

EDIT: it quite possibly is a front loader as has been said so you might have to remove the stem but also crystal and the rest. 

Edited by Chopin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this site has a similar (caseback) Hamilton for sale and the description mentiones 'monocoque case" ie movement comes out the front.

This site also has one (sold) and mentions a 'solid caseback'.

So it could be a one piece case with a split stem. If the crystal has a bezel then try to remove that, failing which just remove the crystal. Then see if the movement will drop out while rotating the crow, sometimes the split-stem will disengage when the slot is 90 degrees to the case.

Good luck.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, clockboy said:

For tight ones I use one of these which I have found this tool  invaluable.

Same principle, full metal, copy of now discontinued Elma :

 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, standarsh said:

“683” was stamped on the movement. Is ESA9154 a different movement?  I’m new to this 

Just as many many brands put their name on calibers made by a different maker today so they did in the past. Up to the end of the 60s Hamilton made their own stuff, then moved operations to Switzerland, then by the mid 70s were bought by the company that became Swatch Group. So this movement was made by ESA (basically ETA), and they put the Hamilton name on it and a new caliber number.

 

Here's a link to the Ranfft page on this caliber http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&ETA-ESA_9154

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

    i have a"683"   as i recall,  there  were 2 mvt.'s.   my case and dial were bad.  when i got it out of the case (you don't want to know how i got it out - via a cross threaded back).   the mvt. ran with the batt. mentioned above.   i'll try to find it.   vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Just as many many brands put their name on calibers made by a different maker today so they did in the past. Up to the end of the 60s Hamilton made their own stuff, then moved operations to Switzerland, then by the mid 70s were bought by the company that became Swatch Group. So this movement was made by ESA (basically ETA), and they put the Hamilton name on it and a new caliber number.

 

Here's a link to the Ranfft page on this caliber http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&ETA-ESA_9154

Got it thanks. Just want to make sure I buy the correct battery in my break today so I can get it home and get it running then see what if anything else I will need to do to it. 
 

is there a faster way to set the time other than spinning the clock 24hrs?  It’s set to 21 right now I don’t want to spin it through a month or wait til tomorrow to put battery in. 
 

thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
×
×
  • Create New...