Jump to content

Help with Seiko Perpetual 8f56 movement.


Recommended Posts

Hi, I recently purchased a Seiko GMT Perpetual off eBay. The watch has a 8f56 Movement which is the high accuracy quartz movement. 

The watch was purchased with a low battery (indicated by the second hand ticking every 5 seconds).

I've since replaced the battery and reset the perpetual calendar, the watch was working for about 3 hours and then just stopped. I've since tried to reset the perpetual calendar again and it doesn't do anything just completely dead. 

I recently went to a local watch repair shop and they said it would need a entirely new movement and would set me back £250 for it. It would however be done by Seiko not themselves. 

Any help is much appreciated.

IMG_20200114_144915.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were you cautious when replacing the battery ? What type of battery did you use ? Is it correct for the movement ? Is it possible that you may have damaged something in the process or maybe something foreign got into the movement ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there! I did everything correctly I followed a repair guide from YouTube on resetting the 8f56 perpetual movement. I didn't break anything at all for a first try I think I did quite good.  

I used a Panasonic CR2412 Cell as I couldn't find a Seiko one. After I fitted the battery and reset the perpetual calendar the watch ran for 3 hours, after that the seconds hand started to stutter. Everything else worked as it should and I could hear it ticking as well. Afte another 3 - 4 hours of the watch stuttering it finally stopped. 

I opened the watch up again and tried to reset the perpetual calendar and nothing happened. I've even tested the voltage from the battery i fitted and that's completely fine. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chopin said:

Were you cautious when replacing the battery ? What type of battery did you use ? Is it correct for the movement ? Is it possible that you may have damaged something in the process or maybe something foreign got into the movement ?

There is only one type of Lithium battery for these modules. Foreign interference is the only plausible explanation. Before giving it to Seiko it should be examined by expert hands, unfortunately there are few when it comes to quartz watches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've read the Panasonic Cr2412 should be fine. Funnily enough when I opened the watch up it already had a Panasonic cell inside it. 

I should mention when I purchased it, the second hand was ticking every 5 seconds. Which is the low battery indicator so it was working before I opened it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chopin said:

Have you tried back the old battery ?

Sorry, what would be the point of that? As the OP indicated:

I've even tested the voltage from the battery i fitted and that's completely fine. 

As mentioned above these movements also have a low charge indicator. There are test procedures which can be done, explained in the technical guide, but generally even knowing what the fault is does not help an owner fixing it.

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering if the watch is fixable or something that a specialist could fix.

Though I think I'll either try and source another working watch and swap the movement. Or put it back on eBay as spares and repairs. 

It's ashame because the watch itself is spotless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jbirkrepair said:

I was wondering if the watch is fixable or something that a specialist could fix.

It's "hardly fixable". Long discontinued, parts are scarce, although Cousins UK has some. It's surprising that Seiko UK claimed to be able to supply a spare module. Really it has failed mysteriously, before giving up on it you could try a line free box, some repairers have it or can be done with a demagnetizer also.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took the Seiko to time piece watch repairs a watch repair company in the UK. They said it would be £250 for a new movement and it would be done through Seiko. But like you I also assumed Seiko wasn't supplying parts for the 8f56 movement.

But what do I know, maybe they do! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take it to an independent and have him check it out thoroughly. He should be able to tell whether something is wrong with it or not. Provided that he's good with quartzes.

I don't think that the movement should just die like that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  jbirkrepair  To set these perpetual date watches is quite complex  I suggest you have a look at our founder Marks video on UTube regarding setting up these watches. Apparently the replacement battery should have orientation tabs fitted, the arrow points to the stem. The circuit board is thin and easily broken if you dont observe the correct replacement proceedure, prying the battery out in the correct place is a must.  The seiko battery is CR1612 Lithium   301A-95N1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, watchweasol that's some solid advice thankyou. That's the exact video I watched upon doing it myself.

Unfortunately the battery i had was a generic Panasonic branded one so it didn't have any tabs to show me where to put it. I did however look at the battery placement on the video as a reference. 

I do think it's the circuit board that's broken as I can't seem to reset the perpetual calendar anymore. Though the hands of the watch can still be adjusted by the crown. 

I have since found a Seiko Specialist in the UK that's quoted me £126 to fully fix the issue and pressure test the watch. 

My question is this a reasonable price and should I go ahead? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Apparently the replacement battery should have orientation tabs fitted, the arrow points to the stem.

Only the original Seiko battery, with its protective film, has tabs to help installation and cuts to allow electrical contact. Since Seiko batteries are difficult to find (Cousins UK has them, but do not ship bt post internationally) and more expensive, Panasonic (the only other manuf.) is normally used, and do work perfectly, as my daily beater witnesses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi under the circumstances and if you really like the watch and the price does'nt look too over the top it would be better to do that,  I have heard some watch repairers charge up to £40 just to pressure test. So its a question of economics, cost of watch plus cost of repair= whats the retail cost of the watch, and if you decided to sell it would you get your money back.   It looks like a nice watch and probably a keeper if so go for it.      Cheers.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
×
×
  • Create New...