Jump to content

Help with Seiko Perpetual 8f56 movement.


Recommended Posts

Hi, I recently purchased a Seiko GMT Perpetual off eBay. The watch has a 8f56 Movement which is the high accuracy quartz movement. 

The watch was purchased with a low battery (indicated by the second hand ticking every 5 seconds).

I've since replaced the battery and reset the perpetual calendar, the watch was working for about 3 hours and then just stopped. I've since tried to reset the perpetual calendar again and it doesn't do anything just completely dead. 

I recently went to a local watch repair shop and they said it would need a entirely new movement and would set me back £250 for it. It would however be done by Seiko not themselves. 

Any help is much appreciated.

IMG_20200114_144915.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were you cautious when replacing the battery ? What type of battery did you use ? Is it correct for the movement ? Is it possible that you may have damaged something in the process or maybe something foreign got into the movement ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there! I did everything correctly I followed a repair guide from YouTube on resetting the 8f56 perpetual movement. I didn't break anything at all for a first try I think I did quite good.  

I used a Panasonic CR2412 Cell as I couldn't find a Seiko one. After I fitted the battery and reset the perpetual calendar the watch ran for 3 hours, after that the seconds hand started to stutter. Everything else worked as it should and I could hear it ticking as well. Afte another 3 - 4 hours of the watch stuttering it finally stopped. 

I opened the watch up again and tried to reset the perpetual calendar and nothing happened. I've even tested the voltage from the battery i fitted and that's completely fine. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chopin said:

Were you cautious when replacing the battery ? What type of battery did you use ? Is it correct for the movement ? Is it possible that you may have damaged something in the process or maybe something foreign got into the movement ?

There is only one type of Lithium battery for these modules. Foreign interference is the only plausible explanation. Before giving it to Seiko it should be examined by expert hands, unfortunately there are few when it comes to quartz watches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've read the Panasonic Cr2412 should be fine. Funnily enough when I opened the watch up it already had a Panasonic cell inside it. 

I should mention when I purchased it, the second hand was ticking every 5 seconds. Which is the low battery indicator so it was working before I opened it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chopin said:

Have you tried back the old battery ?

Sorry, what would be the point of that? As the OP indicated:

I've even tested the voltage from the battery i fitted and that's completely fine. 

As mentioned above these movements also have a low charge indicator. There are test procedures which can be done, explained in the technical guide, but generally even knowing what the fault is does not help an owner fixing it.

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering if the watch is fixable or something that a specialist could fix.

Though I think I'll either try and source another working watch and swap the movement. Or put it back on eBay as spares and repairs. 

It's ashame because the watch itself is spotless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jbirkrepair said:

I was wondering if the watch is fixable or something that a specialist could fix.

It's "hardly fixable". Long discontinued, parts are scarce, although Cousins UK has some. It's surprising that Seiko UK claimed to be able to supply a spare module. Really it has failed mysteriously, before giving up on it you could try a line free box, some repairers have it or can be done with a demagnetizer also.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took the Seiko to time piece watch repairs a watch repair company in the UK. They said it would be £250 for a new movement and it would be done through Seiko. But like you I also assumed Seiko wasn't supplying parts for the 8f56 movement.

But what do I know, maybe they do! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take it to an independent and have him check it out thoroughly. He should be able to tell whether something is wrong with it or not. Provided that he's good with quartzes.

I don't think that the movement should just die like that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  jbirkrepair  To set these perpetual date watches is quite complex  I suggest you have a look at our founder Marks video on UTube regarding setting up these watches. Apparently the replacement battery should have orientation tabs fitted, the arrow points to the stem. The circuit board is thin and easily broken if you dont observe the correct replacement proceedure, prying the battery out in the correct place is a must.  The seiko battery is CR1612 Lithium   301A-95N1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, watchweasol that's some solid advice thankyou. That's the exact video I watched upon doing it myself.

Unfortunately the battery i had was a generic Panasonic branded one so it didn't have any tabs to show me where to put it. I did however look at the battery placement on the video as a reference. 

I do think it's the circuit board that's broken as I can't seem to reset the perpetual calendar anymore. Though the hands of the watch can still be adjusted by the crown. 

I have since found a Seiko Specialist in the UK that's quoted me £126 to fully fix the issue and pressure test the watch. 

My question is this a reasonable price and should I go ahead? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Apparently the replacement battery should have orientation tabs fitted, the arrow points to the stem.

Only the original Seiko battery, with its protective film, has tabs to help installation and cuts to allow electrical contact. Since Seiko batteries are difficult to find (Cousins UK has them, but do not ship bt post internationally) and more expensive, Panasonic (the only other manuf.) is normally used, and do work perfectly, as my daily beater witnesses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi under the circumstances and if you really like the watch and the price does'nt look too over the top it would be better to do that,  I have heard some watch repairers charge up to £40 just to pressure test. So its a question of economics, cost of watch plus cost of repair= whats the retail cost of the watch, and if you decided to sell it would you get your money back.   It looks like a nice watch and probably a keeper if so go for it.      Cheers.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
×
×
  • Create New...