Jump to content

Seiko Spirit - 5M22A help


Recommended Posts

I am looking at a Seiko Spirit which has the refererence 5M22A on the movement. This watch has seen water ingress at some stage and the movement is badly corroded and beyond saving (although case and dial etc. are fine). I've looked to see if i can find a 5M22A on somewhere like ebay but no luck. There do seem to be other '5M22' references though e.g. with suffixes like 7B30, 6C30 etc. I usually only work on (Swiss) mechanical movements so am unfamiliar with Seiko nomenclature ... I don't know what these suffixes mean and whether they'd be suitable.

So basically can someone point me in the right direction and tell me what Seiko movement references I can look at to see if I can find a replacement for the 5M22A please?

Edited by WatchMaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 digits Suffixes are the case number, together with the mov.t they make the basic watch reference.

You can finnd size specifications oine or measure it. Before giving up on it check pulse at the coil, if there is try a line release or demag. 

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The movement is a 5M22. Have some if you like to service and rebuild a movement. Don't think there are any parts avalible out there .  Have a few cases and such for this .  I have what i think is a 3M22 movement in a ladies watch i really would like to get running again . As the watch is in nice condition.  Would make a nice watch to give away . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help and suggestions.

I'm pretty self-sufficent when it comes to mechanical movements but a Seiko kinetic is a new one on me! The case and strap on this watch are titanium and from the front this looks like a great watch - dial unmarked; date and hands move etc. But this is the reality inside! ...

image.thumb.png.27ccb6c7574d0e24395ac90390b2ed18.png

It's looking pretty rusted up in there and the rotor doesn't even turn so I've automatically jumped to the conclusion that a replacement movement is the way to go! The '5M22A' is the identifier I mentioned on the movement; there's a '342391' on the case back.

Hi @watchweasol - if your superior reference skills can locate an alternative that would be great! :)

Thanks @rogart63 that is a very generous offer. If there's not an alternative movement then I'd like to take you up on this!  There's nothing on ebay 5M22 related apart from buying a complete watch! Is the 'service and rebuild' you mention something realistic? I'm a good engineer in general and more specifically have serviced and repaired lots of mechnical watches but quartz and kinetic ... yikes! ;)

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Watchmaker  So far sourcing a replacement has returned negative, references to the 5M22A apart from complete watches is as Rogart says scarce, I think Rogarts  Offer is the way to go, If you are good on mechanicals then treat the seiko the same just be carefull. The origional movement looks a bit rusty but by striipng it you gain knowledge It may be workable, just see haow far the rust has penetrated.  Wish you well:thumbsu:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check this http://www.startimesupply.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=S5M42

and this http://www.startimesupply.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=1&Product_Code=YT62

If you are in the UE/UK maybe someone, excluding Cousins, has it.

Now if wanting for a cheap and practical repair, forget about "Kinetic", try fitting a proper size common battery.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @jdm

And re. your suggestion about fitting a normal movement ... I'm not precious about a kinetic but the case has an ancillary button at the 2 o'clock position which apparently activates a power reserve indicator. It would seem wrong then to have a button that did nothing by fitting a standard movement. But it's got me thinking...

...are there movements with a complication that could be activated by a single button?! I can't think of any but you guys might know of something! B)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

And re. your suggestion about fitting a normal movement ...

I didn't wrote to fit a normal module, just a normal battery in the current one, that is normally done for testing, or when the rechargeable battery can't be obtained, or when the charging part is faulty. However if it doesn't work at all you should fit an equivalent module as indicated above.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello everyone, for what it's worth, here is my approach: 1. Escape wheel submerged in Epilame, then dried quickly with a hairdryer. Then the final tip of the pivots are cleaned by poking into pithwood. The logic being that the Epilame is removed at the intended contact point (to avoid any residue that may mix with the oil), but remains in the areas where oil is not supposed to spread to (further down the pivot towards the wheel). The escape wheel teeth also benefit from having Epilame to keep the 9415 in place.  2. I use a syringe to treat only the pallet stones. I suspend the pallet fork with some Rodico so that the stones hang downwards. I notably use a rather thick needle where a drop WON'T form, but rather where the Epilame liquid stays in the needle tip, which I then dip into the pallet stones. It requires some practice to get the right amount of Epilame into the needle tip, but it works for me now. This way, no drop will "jump" onto the pallet fork and potentially go all the way to the pivots.  3. I let the movement run for a few minutes without lubricating the pallet stones... to scrape off the Epilame in the intended contact "channel". Then I remove the balance again and lubricate the exit pallet stone with 3-4 successive drops. See the "channel" that forms on the pallet stone in the picture -- not so easy to see, but it's visible.   I am conflicted about the use of Epliame in balance jewel settings. My impression is that the two jewels sufficiently suspend the oil (even 9010). Apparently Rolex recommends NOT to use Epliame there (heard from a former Rolex service center watchmaker), as it could cause additional wear. Apart from that, I follow specific instructions where I can find them. E.g. the infamous Rolex reverser wheels or sometimes (parts of) the seconds wheel. Exception: I'm currently servicing an Eta 2824 and will probably ignore the service sheet that recommends treating the whole keyless works with Epilame and then using HP1300... I'll skip the Epilame and use 9504 grease.        
    • I'm going to give this a try today/tomorrow on my UTC33/Seiko 66, thanks!
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Don't forget Mark is a hard working watch maker so he is also tied up with work. I'm sure he is keeping his eye on this forum making sure it is running along nicely. 
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.    
×
×
  • Create New...