Jump to content

Seiko Spirit - 5M22A help


Recommended Posts

I am looking at a Seiko Spirit which has the refererence 5M22A on the movement. This watch has seen water ingress at some stage and the movement is badly corroded and beyond saving (although case and dial etc. are fine). I've looked to see if i can find a 5M22A on somewhere like ebay but no luck. There do seem to be other '5M22' references though e.g. with suffixes like 7B30, 6C30 etc. I usually only work on (Swiss) mechanical movements so am unfamiliar with Seiko nomenclature ... I don't know what these suffixes mean and whether they'd be suitable.

So basically can someone point me in the right direction and tell me what Seiko movement references I can look at to see if I can find a replacement for the 5M22A please?

Edited by WatchMaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 digits Suffixes are the case number, together with the mov.t they make the basic watch reference.

You can finnd size specifications oine or measure it. Before giving up on it check pulse at the coil, if there is try a line release or demag. 

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The movement is a 5M22. Have some if you like to service and rebuild a movement. Don't think there are any parts avalible out there .  Have a few cases and such for this .  I have what i think is a 3M22 movement in a ladies watch i really would like to get running again . As the watch is in nice condition.  Would make a nice watch to give away . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help and suggestions.

I'm pretty self-sufficent when it comes to mechanical movements but a Seiko kinetic is a new one on me! The case and strap on this watch are titanium and from the front this looks like a great watch - dial unmarked; date and hands move etc. But this is the reality inside! ...

image.thumb.png.27ccb6c7574d0e24395ac90390b2ed18.png

It's looking pretty rusted up in there and the rotor doesn't even turn so I've automatically jumped to the conclusion that a replacement movement is the way to go! The '5M22A' is the identifier I mentioned on the movement; there's a '342391' on the case back.

Hi @watchweasol - if your superior reference skills can locate an alternative that would be great! :)

Thanks @rogart63 that is a very generous offer. If there's not an alternative movement then I'd like to take you up on this!  There's nothing on ebay 5M22 related apart from buying a complete watch! Is the 'service and rebuild' you mention something realistic? I'm a good engineer in general and more specifically have serviced and repaired lots of mechnical watches but quartz and kinetic ... yikes! ;)

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Watchmaker  So far sourcing a replacement has returned negative, references to the 5M22A apart from complete watches is as Rogart says scarce, I think Rogarts  Offer is the way to go, If you are good on mechanicals then treat the seiko the same just be carefull. The origional movement looks a bit rusty but by striipng it you gain knowledge It may be workable, just see haow far the rust has penetrated.  Wish you well:thumbsu:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check this http://www.startimesupply.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=S5M42

and this http://www.startimesupply.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=1&Product_Code=YT62

If you are in the UE/UK maybe someone, excluding Cousins, has it.

Now if wanting for a cheap and practical repair, forget about "Kinetic", try fitting a proper size common battery.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @jdm

And re. your suggestion about fitting a normal movement ... I'm not precious about a kinetic but the case has an ancillary button at the 2 o'clock position which apparently activates a power reserve indicator. It would seem wrong then to have a button that did nothing by fitting a standard movement. But it's got me thinking...

...are there movements with a complication that could be activated by a single button?! I can't think of any but you guys might know of something! B)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

And re. your suggestion about fitting a normal movement ...

I didn't wrote to fit a normal module, just a normal battery in the current one, that is normally done for testing, or when the rechargeable battery can't be obtained, or when the charging part is faulty. However if it doesn't work at all you should fit an equivalent module as indicated above.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...