Jump to content

Current Peeve....


Recommended Posts

....sellers who list their Wittnauer as 'Longines wittnauer'? Oh and Sicuras sold as 'Sicura-Brietling'

 

Wittnauers are generally ok but if you buy a Sicura and think you're getting a Brietling... wow what a dissappointment.

 

Reason I bring this up is someone brought me a Wittnauer he paid over the odds for as it was advertised as a Longines. On my advise he requested a refund but he was told by the seller that Wittnauer and Longines are one and the same company... My advise was for him to inform the seller that nowhere on the watch mentions 'Longines' and that there was misrepresentation.

 

Anil

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh - I've been irritated by this for years - sellers talking up their wares on eBay by hinting that they're something they're not. Wittnauer and Longines shared a factory at one time, but the parts are not interchangeable, and a Wittnauer is not a Longines. Similarly with Breitling and Sicura - one is not the other - and the one that really gets up my nose is Rolex Tudor.

 

You do see some stupidities. There's one eBay seller who sells a string of Titoni watches, one after the other, all identical, and describes them all as "rare"! The biggest, scammy talk-up is on so-called "military" watches or "WW1" or "WW2" or "trench". In 99% of cases, there's absolutely no provenance whatsoever for these terms - just a dial that looks vaguely military in style, most of the time, or perhaps a putative date from the 1940s.

 

All **BLEEP** of course. And don't get me started on the use of the word "vintage"... :pulling-hair-out:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a rather good discussion on this going on on another forum at the moment. By far the most disliked fleabay terminology is 'rare' with all its misused prefixes such as 'super', 'mega', 'extremely', etc. Didn't somebody say something once about 'lies, damned lies & statistics, about time it was updated to dodgy fleabay sellers instead of statistics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
    • Why just the bottom mike ? Is it worth polishing the whole arm ?
    • The one thing I took time over was to round and polish the curves at the bottom of the jumper arm. The slightest mark (left over from cutting of filing) acts as a stress raiser, just where you don't need it. 
×
×
  • Create New...