Jump to content

Benrus 46374 military issue movt removal


Recommended Posts

I have a watch that appears to run but will need an overhaul due to age.

It is a Military issue watch that the original owner has.  Case is plastic and is indicated on the case back "(NON MAINTAINABLE)".

I would like to line up the split stem, like so |i| and the movement could simply "fall out" of the case but I'm not having much luck.  As this is probably the first time the movement has been removed from the case, there is little wear for it to loosely fall out.  I fear too much tweezer pressure wedge between crown and plastic case and this the owners original issue to himself.

Any past experienced users of this extraction?

 

 

D4521F65-C61C-4C71-A30C-FCEDE1DA6227_1_105_c.jpeg

8A2BFD40-A247-4D5B-906D-F6D25C5DF45A_1_105_c.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like the 3818B, type I, type II, and Hamilton GG-W-113  there is no way to remove movement without separating the split stem. So its a judgment call on your end. Is it worth the risk of damage? You haven’t worked with it before and you did say it ran so maybe leaving it as is would be your best choice. I have one in my collection its runs for about 7 hours and that’s good enough for me. These were made to be worn and thrown away but doesn’t mean they cant be serviced the movement is the same as type I only difference would be that its a 7 jewel movement.

Edited by saswatch88
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is like a normal  split stem it should  come out with  a little  judicious  " jiggery pokery". Try  this..while gently  lifting  the  movement  at the  9    ( pokery) rotate the crown ( jiggery).. observe the movement. It will rise and fall.when the edge farest from the crown is at its highest  point the spilt will be perpendicular  to the case. The movement  can then be removed  without  damage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comment saswatch88

I got the movement out.  Being a metal movement installed in a snug fit plastic case only once at the factory, this was not going to just be tapped out of its case.  I used some fine dental floss and worked it in starting at the stem side with the ends of the string at the 9 o'clock position.  This let me leverage up on that side.  I could then just rotate the split stem where the male part was horizontal to the case.  I then could gently coerce the movement by rotating it just enough to slide the female part of the stem from the male part.  Did not have to pull outward on stem for separation.

7 jeweler but it was very dry.  It is remarkable working on this realizing it has been in the Vietnam War.

397D6533-BC8A-44F2-9ED7-A1CCE5A0DF1E_1_105_c.jpeg

702AD0DC-1E69-460A-A6DE-7DE2863D73ED_1_105_c.jpeg

3F491BEA-D164-4831-A4A1-2C70B89E266B_1_201_a.jpeg

Edited by GeorgeC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
    • Aloha and thanks for catching all these small but important details, John.  I'm going to give it a shot. The good news is I have a parts movement here with a perfect complete balance.  I will place them side by side for visual reference when doing what you outlined.  It's been a while were I've had a hobby in which I joined a forum.  I forgot just how helpful everyone can be. Mahalo. Frank.
    • Mike if you wanna drop me your address I'll send you a strip of this cs 100 in an envelope . I'd like your opinion of its workability  The cs100 might be better carbon is 1%
×
×
  • Create New...