Jump to content

Omega part identification


buzz12

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Hoping someone can help with my weird dilemma.

I have found among my watch parts, what appears to be a factory sealed Omega part labelled 563-1530. If I am not mistaken, that part should be a date corrector but it does not look like I would expect. Is it a date corrector? If not, does anyone know what part it is?

DSCF4595.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without searching, it seems exactly that to me. The teeth drives the date ring and one hole must be for the pivot on the plate. Numbers like 1530 here are coded to indicate what part is that. Someone will possibly post the technical sheet here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input guys. Looking at the data sheet, am I correct in thinking Omega has re-modeled part 1530 at some point? The data sheet shows the part looking like a coil, yet my part looks more like a plate. Maybe one is earlier than the other? Since they are not identical parts would you not have expected them to have a different code number? Picture below is what's shown in the data sheet as 1530. 

1530.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, buzz12 said:

Thanks for the input guys. Looking at the data sheet, am I correct in thinking Omega has re-modeled part 1530 at some point? The data sheet shows the part looking like a coil, yet my part looks more like a plate.

Good point. If you observe the geometry of the holes and tooth you will see they are the same. So why the "coil"? It's protection against breakage when trying to correct date (backward) at the same time it's advancing around mid night. The flexible finger bends and nothing breaks, but isn't so with the other type. Other mov'ts use a springed finger, or it's made of plastic in the date driving wheel (Seiko below). Notwithstanding all that you can still read in the user manual of most watches a warning against correcting time around midnight, better safe than sorry must be the reasoning.

 

Quote

Since they are not identical parts would you not have expected them to have a different code number?

Good point also. The code number can't change, 563-1530 is always, and generically, date corrector for the 563. There is no coded number for "improved date corrector". So how to do when parts change depending on the mov't variations, just use more numbers like there are in the package above, these are  like "manufacturing numbers", and are detailed in some technical document.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks JDM… very interesting and helpful. So I am guessing mine is most likely the earlier version 563-1530 that over time has been improved to a coil shape. But since both have the same code (1530) is it safe to assume that if I needed to order a 563-1530 date corrector (without picture or barcode info) it would not matter which version I received? By that I mean, would it fit? Or, is the difference likely to be significant to certain variants of the calibre? – ie one will fit earlier models but not the later models and vica versa?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, buzz12 said:

Or, is the difference likely to be significant to certain variants of the calibre? – ie one will fit earlier models but not the later models and vica versa?

In this case it seems to me it would fit. In general, to know beforehand one should have the full collection of all the technical documents issued. The other, common way is to reason and try. And since a good while it became possible to ask on the Internet :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have it, so until we get a lunch one day , nearly everyday is with my mum at the moment.
    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...