Jump to content

Paul Garnier Chaff Cutter Escapement


wls1971

Recommended Posts

I have a wooden cased carriage clock dating from about 1840 fitted with a Paul Garnier "Chaff Cutter" Escapement, has anyone ever worked on or come across one of these it was a fore runner to the platform escapement, It runs but seem to have a arc of swing on the balance wheel of about 60 degrees is this correct for these escapements ?, it does run well and if the balance is gently stopped it springs back to life instantly once released, I have read that the action of the escapement is of a dead beat variety and is in some way related to a verge escapement but I can find very little on the web about them., It consists of two club toothed discs that make up the escape wheel, with a half circular disc with sloping edges on the staff, that releases and locks the opposing discs on the escape wheel as it swings.

If anyone has any info or knows of a site with any please let me know.IMG_2965.thumb.JPG.525b00e55339c868cffb6059d62d05e8.JPGIMG_2970.thumb.JPG.8661d605e6024bc5491b8da724477c6b.JPGIMG_2973.thumb.JPG.d7c3176dad8525a55e8b8b265163823c.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was a variation of Debaufre's escapement, which was interrelated with several others all trying to deal with the massive recoil of the escape wheel in the verge escapement. There is a good description in Paul Chamberlain's It's About Time.  Like a cylinder or most any frictional rest escapement amplitude is normally quite low and you may find that there is a pin on the balance to prevent it going too high- though perhaps not on a stationary clock like this. One interesting thing with frictional rest escapements is they are somewhat self regulating regarding isochronism, as when power goes up the friction during the non-escape time goes up too, limiting the amplitude.

 

60 degrees seems a bit low, I would imagine about double that if everything is in good order and lubricated. But if it's working well it's not really a huge issue, the fact that it self starts right away is a very good sign.

 

There is a good chance there is some sort of adjustment for the depthing of the escape wheels to the impulse table on the staff; most verge escapements had this too. When one escape tooth has just "escaped" the following tooth should land on the flat surface of the impulse table. If it's landing on the sloped surface the depthing is too light.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don’t get much of a swing from the balance with this type of escapement; it is nothing like the swing of an anchor escapement. They are slow in comparison much like as you say a Verge. The ones I have worked on I think 3 or 4 after a proper O/H always seemed lazy in the rotation; it’s as if the balance wheel was too heavy for the hair spring. I don’t see much oil on the two club toothed discs, this might be to do with the photo. Not a very popular escapement, which might be due to its poor action.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

You don’t get much of a swing from the balance with this type of escapement; it is nothing like the swing of an anchor escapement. They are slow in comparison much like as you say a Verge. The ones I have worked on I think 3 or 4 after a proper O/H always seemed lazy in the rotation; it’s as if the balance wheel was too heavy for the hair spring. I don’t see much oil on the two club toothed discs, this might be to do with the photo. Not a very popular escapement, which might be due to its poor action.  

Yes as you say the action seems Lazy in comparison to a platform lever or cylinder escapement, they also seem to inhabit a short space of time in carriage clock production 1830-1850 , with platform escapements soon superseding them. I did oil the escape wheels but just a small drop of oil on one tooth on each , it has been running three days now but I have not measured time keeping performance yet but I should imagine it will run far short of a good platform escapement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wls1971 said:

I have a wooden cased carriage clock dating from about 1840 fitted with a Paul Garnier "Chaff Cutter" Escapement, has anyone ever worked on or come across one of these it was a fore runner to the platform escapement, It runs but seem to have a arc of swing on the balance wheel of about 60 degrees is this correct for these escapements ?, it does run well and if the balance is gently stopped it springs back to life instantly once released, I have read that the action of the escapement is of a dead beat variety and is in some way related to a verge escapement but I can find very little on the web about them., It consists of two club toothed discs that make up the escape wheel, with a half circular disc with sloping edges on the staff, that releases and locks the opposing discs on the escape wheel as it swings.

If anyone has any info or knows of a site with any please let me know.IMG_2965.thumb.JPG.525b00e55339c868cffb6059d62d05e8.JPGIMG_2970.thumb.JPG.8661d605e6024bc5491b8da724477c6b.JPGIMG_2973.thumb.JPG.d7c3176dad8525a55e8b8b265163823c.JPG

What a great movement..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • this is something I've never quite understood about the some of the Swiss companies. In 1957 Omega was using 9010 for the keyless parts with epilam. there's been a slow migration towards using heavier lubrication's but still typically oils and epilam to keep them in place. When it seems like 9504 works so much better.  
    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
×
×
  • Create New...