Jump to content

Rinse baths


aac58

Recommended Posts

Many times we've asked about the best cleaning products/procedures for watch parts. And that includes of course the rinse baths, but usually we are more focused on the cleaning products.

I use naphtha to clean, and IPA to rinse, andc the results are not bad I think, but I'd say they are not on the top range. I work on my own vintege Seikos (6xxx and 7xxx series) and when everything goes right I get amplitude at about 220º.

Today I've made a mistake and I've used a naphtha bath when I was trying to rinse the parts. Then I've notice under the microscope that there were a lot of old disolved oils on the jewels, and using a pegwood that oils could be removed (or al least moved) After a good IPA rinse that oils had dissapeared, so I think IPA is great for that task.

My questions then is: as I do not rinse on IPA the balance wheel nor the pallet fork, I now think these two parts are not properly cleand and that can be affecting the amplitude. How do you rinse them? Can you give me some advice please?

Thanks for reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put the balance through the cleaning process mounted on the main plate along with the rest of the parts. When I was touring the Patek repair center in New York in November this is what they did as well. Leads me to think it must not be as dangerous as some people say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CaptCalvin said:

I put the balance through the cleaning process mounted on the main plate along with the rest of the parts...

I also clean the balance mounted on the main plate, but I take it and the pallet out before rinse with IPA, as it could affect the shellac on the jewels. That's why I think I need a different rinse that is shellac friendly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 hours ago, aac58 said:

Today I've made a mistake and I've used a naphtha bath when I was trying to rinse the parts.

Which "naptha"? If you use "refined benzine", or "petroleoum ether", or Hexane, that leaves no residue. These products can found online, or a chemist store, or even at the pharmacy. That being said, I do rinse in demilitarized water and IPA myself. And I took the habit of looking at liquid against light, if I can spot more than one floating particle I re-clean the (appropriately named) benzine jar and replace the fluid.

44 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

A quick rinse in IPA will not dissolve shellac. 10+ minutes, yes it will.

Correct. But as in any lubrication / cleaning discussion, pre-made opinions are mostly impossible to change. Fortunately for Ronsonol :biggrin:

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

A quick rinse in IPA will not dissolve shellac. 10+ minutes, yes it will.

Yes, that's what I've heard but I've never dare to do so, if the pallets or the impulse pin moves I wouldn´t be able to reshellac, and unless they are totally apart I probably woudn't find the cause of the problems.

21 minutes ago, jdm said:

 

Which "naptha"? ...

The product I use is sold as petroleum ether and "hidrocarburo C9". It leaves no residue, but what I see is some drops of the old oils disolved but stucked on the wheel jewels, like a kind of jelly I'd say.

With the IPA rinse that jelly dissapears almost completely, but I don't think it's a good idea to put the balance and pallet in the ultrasonic with IPA, I wish I could use a different and affordable product.

Next time I'll watch the pallets under the microscope looking for any trace of oil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, aac58 said:

With the IPA rinse that jelly dissapears almost completely, but I don't think it's a good idea to put the balance and pallet in the ultrasonic with IPA, I wish I could use a different and affordable product.

Certainly one would not use U/S for rinsing, because all "dirt" adhesion must have been broken at this point. A quick IPA bath is all what is needed. But in a cleaning discussion let's not put facts or experience before feelings :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aac58 said:

The product I use is sold as petroleum ether and "hidrocarburo C9".

This stuff is the most confusing ever, to me at least. I have looked Hydrocarbon C9 and come up with the info sheet attached. It's not understandable unless you're a specialized chemist. In summary 4 main products fall in this category:

  • 95-63-6 Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethyl
  • 108-67-8 Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl
  • 25550-14-5 Benzene, ethylmethyl (ethyltoluene mixed isomers)
  •  64742-95-6 Solvent naphtha, (petroleum), light aromatic

The first three are the much dreaded (because of its toxicity) benzene. The last one doesn't carry a "mixed isomers" name that is on the product that I use wich has CAS 649-328-00-1, neither is "standard petroleum ether", CAS  8032-32-4. I can only suppose they are all "pure" and dissolve oils to some degree.

C9 Aromatic Hydrocarbon Solvents Category SIAP.pdf

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

L&R Ultrasonic rinse. While you are at it get the cleaning fluid too. They are $50 for a gallon, they can be filtered and last you a long time, its not like your servicing 10-20 watches a day. One dip on the pallet and balance assembly if you don’t want to change your chemicals. Problem solved. Remember Solvents like naphtha will leave an oily residue, so getting a better cleanser will make your rinses more effective.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, aac58 said:

But the question was about the rinse, not the cleaning product :lolu:

Largely answered above already and going from a fluid to another hopefully won't get me punished :-) 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, jdm said:

That being said, I do rinse in demilitarized water and IPA myself.

1 hour ago, jdm said:

Largely answered above already and going from a fluid to another hopefully won't get me punished :-) 

 

Depends what intelligence agency discovers you've been straying into a DMZ to get your water. B) :biggrin:

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎1‎/‎2‎/‎2020 at 5:25 AM, aac58 said:

Many times we've asked about the best cleaning products/procedures for watch parts. And that includes of course the rinse baths, but usually we are more focused on the cleaning products.

I use naphtha to clean, and IPA to rinse, andc the results are not bad I think, but I'd say they are not on the top range. I work on my own vintege Seikos (6xxx and 7xxx series) and when everything goes right I get amplitude at about 220º.

Today I've made a mistake and I've used a naphtha bath when I was trying to rinse the parts. Then I've notice under the microscope that there were a lot of old disolved oils on the jewels, and using a pegwood that oils could be removed (or al least moved) After a good IPA rinse that oils had dissapeared, so I think IPA is great for that task.

My questions then is: as I do not rinse on IPA the balance wheel nor the pallet fork, I now think these two parts are not properly cleand and that can be affecting the amplitude. How do you rinse them? Can you give me some advice please?

Thanks for reading.

    i am guessing, but IPA =  iso  propel alcohol ?  if so,   it is available in  several concentration WITH  water..   99% will wipe out shellac.   pharmacies   have 75% and call it "rubbing  alcohol"  AND  if un stoppered,  it will draw water  from the air.  if dilute enough,   it is like cleaning with water.   vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IPA is isopropyl alcohol. A quick rinse (under a minute or two) in 99% is absolutely ok. My cleaning machine (Greiner) uses it as a rinse, the instructions say to rinse the fork and balance for that long; it has always worked fine for me. Some manufacturers call for a final rinse in IPA as well, 99%. It's really OK to do.

Take a fork with shellac on it and see how long it takes to dissolve in IPA. You'll be surprised.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CaptCalvin said:

Forgot to mention that in my tour of the Patek facility I found that they use isopropyl alcohol as a final rinse as well.

I think the use of IPA is a bit frowned upon a bit too much but as said it is perfectly fine to use on certain movements according to manufacturers recommendation but i believe it should only be used in this instance. Not sure why that is maybe something to do with shellac shelf life for example i would never use ipa on vintage movements. if it doesn’t dissolve the shellac it softens it enough to mess up the pallet jewels positioning, thus messing up my lock and exit. Found this out the hard way years ago when started out with watch repair as a hobby, i used it on some older movements mostly pre-1960 and I couldn’t figure out why nothing worked after i cleaned and reassembled. Those days i was using the old ronsonol/ipa method. And came to find out that even after a quick rinse (5 minutes tops in ultrasonic) my pallet and roller jewels were coming loose. So in that case i would not use it on pallet or balance for any amount of time unless specified by manufacturer. Kinda sucks because it such a great product to use esp for hairsprings. Sometimes I am temped to just remove the HS just to dunk it in IPA.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2020 at 9:16 AM, saswatch88 said:

L&R Ultrasonic rinse.

I think I made this identical comment before but here we go again. The above cost £35.50 + VAT + significant shipping due to it's weight. Then we look at it's composition from the attached sheet and we get:

Component                                       CAS Number        Percentage
Stoddard Solvent (C6H6 < 0.1%)   8052-41-3            70-80
Solvent Naphtha Light Aliphatic    64742-89-8          20-30

Personally I use something like 5cc for each rinse so certainly I have no use for a gallon. And I can make the same fluid with just two economical products bought locally.

Also I find curious that an highly flammable fluid is sold to be used in Ultrasonic cleaners, which (at least the ones I have seen) expressly frown upon that.

93_F2802 COSH Sheet.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

I think I made this identical comment before but here we go again. The above cost £35.50 + VAT + significant shipping due to it's weight. Then we look at it's composition from the attached sheet and we get:

Component                                       CAS Number        Percentage
Stoddard Solvent (C6H6 < 0.1%)   8052-41-3            70-80
Solvent Naphtha Light Aliphatic    64742-89-8          20-30

Personally I use something like 5cc for each rinse so certainly I have no use for a gallon. And I can make the same fluid with just two economical products bought locally.

Also I find curious that an highly flammable fluid is sold to be used in Ultrasonic cleaners, which (at least the ones I have seen) expressly frown upon that.

93_F2802 COSH Sheet.pdf 1.17 MB · 1 download

Naphtha is used all the time in ultrasonics with respect to watch servicing its found in many ultrasonic cleaning fluids esp L&R. The difference being that naphtha in L&R is a much higher grade than Naptha found at your local hardware store. It has a much higher vapor pressure making it safe to use in ultrasonic. You will not get this info from a Cosh sheet. This why it pays to get the stuff designed for actual watch cleaning rather than looking up cosh sheets and trying to play chemist with chemicals you don’t fully understand. I think if $50 or 36 euros is too big of and expense then i cant imagine what kind of tools you use for your repairs and servicing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, saswatch88 said:

I think if $50 or 36 euros is too big of and expense then i cant imagine what kind of tools you use for your repairs and servicing.

No need to imagine, as I post frequently on the subject, with the intent of easing a reasoned, affordable approach to watch repair :biggrin:

Just like our host Mark and many others here I try to avoid any uppity and emitting canned but often empty statements. Then anyone should be able to draw his own conclusions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jdm said:

No need to imagine, as I post frequently on the subject, with the intent of easing a reasoned, affordable approach to watch repair :biggrin:

Just like our host Mark and many others here I try to avoid any uppity and emitting canned but often empty statements. Then anyone should be able to draw his own conclusions.

 

A great watchmaker on another forum said “ your tools, oils, and cleaning methods will reflect in your work regardless of skill.” So the affordable approach is not the best advice given, or if going to give it at least say it’s not your best option. Your last statement is ironic since you the one trolling all my posts with nonsensical responses with underlying hints of sarcasm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, saswatch88 said:

A great watchmaker on another forum said “ your tools, oils, and cleaning methods will reflect in your work regardless of skill.” So the affordable approach is not the best advice given, or if going to give it at least say it’s not your best option. Your last statement is ironic since you the one trolling all my posts with nonsensical responses with underlying hints of sarcasm. 

Harassed by my factual contributions? Or bothered of being called out on your reprieving postings, inevitably coming from self-professed high grounds, but never supported by a single picture or detail of your work. As in the recurrent "timegrapher apps are garbage", or the petty personal attacks in this very thread.
It may sound strange to you, but I do respect everybody's opinion including your, and if you take the time to read back what I wrote, you'l find words like "I think", and "personally". 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
    • Hold the crown when in winding position, move the click away from the crown wheel, and then while holding the crown let it slowly unwind. I recollect that you must remove the automatic device bridge first, but maybe I'm wrong. You can first try without removing the automatic device bridge.
    • nevenbekriev- You nailed it with your description of me and my reaction when the clock started ticking again. I am a newbie.  I love the sound and idea of mechanical clocks but the idea of owning one and trying to keep them running has never appealed to me. My wife bought this one and an antique German wall clock.  When I looked into having someone repair them for me, the universal response was "it's really expensive to work on them, you should just replace the movement". So, I had nothing to lose, I started researching them and opened them up. The wife is happy because she hears the sound of the clocks again. But I have gone down the "accuracy" rabbit hole. In the vertical position, the balance wheel was not floating. It was sitting on the bottom of the frame. I adjusted the lower spring collet and got it floating. It easily passed the 270 degree 3 to 5 minute oscillation test. It took 8 minutes for the wheel to completely stop moving.  I put it the unit back in the movement and checked the safety pin. It does not touch the safety roller anywhere in +/-270 degrees rotation from neutral position. But the amplitude of the rotation with the spring fully wound is weak based on what you are saying. It rotates +/-90 degrees from the neutral position.  No, I did not take the movement completely apart.  That seemed way outside my skill set at the time. There is a reason I became an electrical engineer and not a mechanical engineer. I am much more comfortable with moving electrons than tiny moving metal parts. Will I do it in the long run? Anything can happen. I don't seem to be able to let it go.
×
×
  • Create New...