Jump to content

Barrel arbor slipping


espenbd

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I’m trying to replace a mainspring in a watch, but the barrel arbor is not catching the new spring. I tried to make the spring opening smaller with a tweezer, but no luck. Any tips?
 

See the pictures. Is the barrel arbor looking ok? I’m fairly new in this game, but have not had problems with mainsprings before.

Thanks,

-Espen

 

C41EE940-EA16-4A2B-9351-6EC964C9E648.jpeg

392116FB-8C2C-46B0-854F-B76A9929CB0B.jpeg

7200D738-8B0A-4F3C-913C-F7331122E0F2.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi reform the spring center and set it sightly off center so when the arbor is turned it picks up the anchor point.  Make sure the spring is in the right way round  for it to contact the anchor point. When done check the locking of the spring by fitting in a pin  vise and rotating the arbor and watch the arbour pick up the spring,  then fit the barrel lid carefully.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well there should be a little hook on the arbor that engages the mainspring. look at it under magnification.you will see it . one side will be a ramp, the other a 90 degree angle. it should engage. if it does not my first instinct would be that the spring has been installed upside own..I have done this myself..

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a CAL. 2750. Still having trouble to reform the spring center. Either the spring get’s too small for the arbor to fit, or it’s too wide. I don’t have jeverly files, so can’t file the hook.

Any tips with tools to form the spring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  I normaly use a pair of round nose pliers to avoid kinking the spring and have had no problems.  I would check that the anchor point will actually fit in the spring slot if not no amount of re forming will make it fit, In such a case the answer is to open the spring slot with a jewelers file or needle file.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, espenbd said:

It’s a CAL. 2750. Still having trouble to reform the spring center. Either the spring get’s too small for the arbor to fit, or it’s too wide. I don’t have jeverly files, so can’t file the hook.

Any tips with tools to form the spring?

You can,t  re-bend that spring end too many times, breaks easy.

A bit tight would have worked.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's very interesting information. I haven't tried to see if my bombé jewel holes have olive holes but I think I should be able to tell on the larger jewels at least. See if I get a chance to have a look later today. This little story was very comforting to read for a "bungler" like myself. That success isn't a given even for a pro. Thanks for sharing!
    • I forgot that I said I would do that. Will take some tomorrow and post them up post haste.
    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
×
×
  • Create New...