Jump to content

SEIKO 5


Recommended Posts

The bezel is a press fit.  Search google for Seiko Casing Guide.  It shows in detail all the various case configurations and steps to assemble.  There is a lot of information in the Introduction of the Casing Guide.

I have a Seiko that looks like the same crystal configuration. Not fun to reinstall and Seiko gasket parts are not around any more.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, berniethebolt said:

got to agree,you can see the thread.i have cleaned it and there does not seem to be any damage on the thread itself,but it will not bite.might have to put it on the back burner!

Place parts at eye level. Place the bezel as level as possible, positioned like 10 minutes before the threads mesh. Use case opening ball to press down a bit while rotating. Be reassured, it's just a matter of patience some time.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a lot of Seiko watches of this vintage.  The only Seikos I've seen with a screw down bezel are divers.  If this were a screw down bezel, there would be notches.  That is how Seiko does it.  If I remember correctly, there is a prominent grove in the bezel and case that retains the plastic gasket.  

Looking at the parts list for this watch, the gaskets involved have a part number so they are plastic.  Almost every rubber Seiko gasket is coded so you know the shape and size.  OC3060--- is a common case back gasket.  O for o shape (cross section).  Size category C.  30.60 mm ID.  The rest of the letters and numbers mean various things that don't usually matter.   There is a Seiko Gasket guide out there but I can't find it right now.  It gives all the shape and size codes.  You can usually find a generic substitute using this information if genuine Seiko is not available. 

The Seiko Casing Guide will show the construction of the bezel and the tools needed to remove and replace the crystal.  The only dies I could get to work correctly on my bezels were Seiko Tool S-220 dies.  Nothing else had the correct diameter or profile to work correctly. 

I have substituted I-ring and L-ring glass gaskets for Seiko plastic gaskets but they rarely fit the same.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To further complicate things, the watch case posted does not correspond to most google pictures of a 6309-8840.  It has a 3 o'clock crown and google pictures are mostly 4 o'clock crowns.  There really is no way to know what case that really is.  That case number shows up on several other case shapes and sizes.  Mostly on one case shape with several dial colors.  Seiko does not use the same number for different shapes.  The case backs size is very consistent though.

My guess is the watch came from an Indian seller on eBay.  At a minimum, the case back has been swapped. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, bklake said:

To further complicate things, the watch case posted does not correspond to most google pictures of a 6309-8840.  It has a 3 o'clock crown and google pictures are mostly 4 o'clock crowns.  There really is no way to know what case that really is.  That case number shows up on several other case shapes and sizes.  Mostly on one case shape with several dial colors.  Seiko does not use the same number for different shapes.  The case backs size is very consistent though.

My guess is the watch came from an Indian seller on eBay.  At a minimum, the case back has been swapped. 

you are probably right.having looked at the movement it looks a little shabby although it is working ok.(not timed it yet)might give it back because my friend is not too bothered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...