Jump to content

favre leuba spring


gary17

Recommended Posts

Hey

This is a favre leuba cal 253 .Can any one tell me were this spring goes to return the clutch lever. If i put it were i think it goes (see first pic).

The wheel don't fit right. it to high , the setting bridge wont locate. But i cannot see were else to put it.

any suggestions.

Or diagrams.

cheers

gary

IMG_20191213_225746.jpg

IMG_20191213_225627.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you notice your setting lever has a protruding pin? Normally the spring would go behind the lever doesn't look like there's room?  So looks like your spring should have the long part pushing on the protruding pin of the lever the rest of it will go in the  recessed area next to it then the plates will go on top and hold everything in place.

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Favre-Leuba_253

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

Yer the problem seems to be were the spring is secured. When you put the wheel on top of the spring there is nothing left of the column to locate the bridge. If you try the spring will not stay in position. I was hoping someone had come across this problem. 

Regards

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the spring not fit as shown, behind the lever, rather than locate on the pin (column) on top of the lever.

SpringIssue.jpg.76be9fcab76ceb6f7f71db0d874ece99.jpg

The pin (column) is there to locate the upper keyless lever, not to locate the spring I think.

When fitting, take care not to launch it in to space (cover with tip of pegwood, or a blob of rodico when fitting). Place the upper lever immediately after fitting to avoid any flying spring incidents.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would disagree with the location of the spring in the picture above the reason for this is in the picture I have the post circled in green has a wheel that goes there missing in this picture would be helpful if that would go back on its post. Then there's zero space behind the setting lever to put in a spring at all. This is where the protruding post becomes interesting and the circular recess that's level with the spring. So in my version the drawing you can see what I think the spring should go.

jumper spring.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I would disagree with the location of the spring in the picture above the reason for this is in the picture I have the post circled in green has a wheel that goes there missing in this picture would be helpful if that would go back on its post. Then there's zero space behind the setting lever to put in a spring at all. This is where the protruding post becomes interesting and the circular recess that's level with the spring. So in my version the drawing you can see what I think the spring should go.

jumper spring.JPG

I agree, the green circled area is where another gear is supposed to go (otherwise you won't be able to set the hands).

The spring most likely goes where the pink mark is. Sometimes these springs don't have an obvious-looking designated spot where they go, I guess that's how some makers made their movements back in the days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick look at the parts catalogue sheet on Cousins suggests that your spring isn’t quite the right shape which will always make the guesswork harder. Cousins has them in stock at only £2.20 so worth getting a replacement.

The installation is a little unusual, but the Google drive link in this thread has a pretty good image

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/1919-favre-leuba-253-service/page/2/

There is also a suggestion in that thread that the barrel arbours might not both be the same. Worth a check they are in the right places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...