Jump to content

Tudor 2447 Timegrapher Results


mzinski

Recommended Posts

Hello, 

I’m currently attempting to clean up a 1964 Tudor Princess Oysterdate 7981 with a Tudor 2447 movement. I purchased it knowing I had to replace the stem and assuming a cleaning was in order. 
Well, it cleaned up nicely. On my inspection, I did not notice broken jewels, worn wheels, or otherwise. I did, however, notice the bottom cap jewel for the balance was worn and the Hairspring slightly misshapen (touching coils). I replaced both. There is very little information on this movement online. As I have been able to research, it appears this is a modified ETA 2369 with 18,000bph and lift angle of 51. 
Annoyingly, the beat error is regulated by turning the Hairspring collar - very tedious but I got it to an average of 0.3ms. 
on the timegrapher I am getting a very strange reading - a pattern of “X’s” every 8 seconds. It indicates the watch is losing 40 seconds a day but the reality is it’s gaining time (2-4 min per day). 
I replaced the escape wheel thinking something could be wrong there but the readings did not change. 
Can anyone advise on what I should be looking for? I’m a bit at a lose. 
Happy to post pictures of any part, please just let me know. 
Thanks in advance! 
 

ED21B5E3-5203-4679-83AA-D39180A65085.png

F1B1C1A8-CC81-48DB-8578-ED6C96291192.jpeg

Edited by mzinski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, clockboy said:

I have never come across such a reading. I don't think the readings are from a timegrapher display. Is it the "Watch Tuner" app of a smart phone if so someone more familiar with this app might be able to decipher the reading. 

Yes, it is an iPhone app called Timegrapher. While it’s not a dedicated timegrapher, I have been able to use it to successfully and consistently regulate a wide variety of movements (7750, 2784, 2824, 2836, 7420, 1120, 3135, 1215, etc). Of all the movements timed on this app, this is the only one to produce such a strange result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since it's regularly happening every 8 seconds I'm thinking a gearing problem; the 4th wheel has 8 teeth in its pinion, which will equate to 7.5 seconds per tooth "in action"- but it would be odd that all the teeth on that pinion or the 3rd wheel that drives it would be damaged and damaged equally. Though if for example the train bridge was removed with power on the watch the 3rd wheel teeth may have zipped accross another component raising burrs or something.

 

Is the train nice and free with the balance and fork out?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Since it's regularly happening every 8 seconds I'm thinking a gearing problem; the 4th wheel has 8 teeth in its pinion, which will equate to 7.5 seconds per tooth "in action"- but it would be odd that all the teeth on that pinion or the 3rd wheel that drives it would be damaged and damaged equally. Though if for example the train bridge was removed with power on the watch the 3rd wheel teeth may have zipped accross another component raising burrs or something.

 

Is the train nice and free with the balance and fork out?

I’ll pull the wheels and inspect them. 
 

The train is responsive and free. However, there is minimal recoil - even after two cleanings. Perhaps another cleaning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mzinski said:

I’ll pull the wheels and inspect them. 
 

The train is responsive and free. However, there is minimal recoil - even after two cleanings. Perhaps another cleaning. 

The train freedom test is a good one and should always be done, but even if free with backlash sometimes things change when everything is actually under power; do have a good look at the teeth of the 3rd wheel and 4th pinion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice if you would give us timing results in another position as I assume you timed it dial down? So rotating into a crown position like crown down we can see if the results look the same. Then any time your graphical display doesn't look right then the numbers are not going to be correct either even if they look like valid numbers they probably aren't. Then one of the reasons we question year nifty app is in the past we've seen examples of bad timing results because the apps usually have inappropriate pickup devices to properly get the sounds from the watch to the app giving us goofy results.

Then for Rebanking I like the video below visually and audio is presented.

https://youtu.be/Rcqrb3_vin8

Then how are you cleaning the watch.

When you reassemble watch check the end shake of the wheels. It looks like from your bridge that it's only held in place by two screws it's possible that it's been bent down in the middle I just can't tell from the picture whether it has any support at the end or not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, mzinski said:

I will give it a listen again tonite and respond. 
 

Is re-banking possible with a lower amplitude, 210-230? 

I haven't researched the topic of amplitude all that deeply but it wouldn't make any sense to me. For rebanking to occur I estimate that the amplitude would have reach somewhere in the neighborhood of 340°.

When rebanking occurs the graph and the stats of  a timing machine can go chaos-like and that's how I (likely incorrectly) interpreted the results of your timing machine at a glance.

Anyway, it's usually a good idea to listen to a movement as (with some practice) it can give some clues. My advice would be to read carefully what @nickelsilver and @JohnR725 have to say as they are both very knowledgeable.

Edited by VWatchie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to take a wild guess that this is a hairspring issue.

The coil may be touching/sticking every few seconds, this in turn may cause a sudden shift in amplitude, which then flattens back out, then as the amplitude recovers, the problem repeats.  What makes me think this is a likely candidate is that I can't see any gear that has the exact number of teeth/period required to cause such an stable effect. Rebanking would suggest a much higher amplitude than the one you are seeing, hence my thoughts that it is probably the oscillator, and in particular, the hairspring. 

Clean, demagnetize and carefully inspect the hairspring for flatness and concentricity.

EDIT: Also check the end shake.

Video the balance in operation, and play back slowly (1/16th of normal speed or less) and you may be able to spot  if I am correct.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so here’s what I’ve got: 

- Took a vídeo slow motion of the balance wheel in action. I don’t notice any sticking but I will figure out how to post and link to it shortly for thoughts. 
- Hairspring appears to have a nice shape. 
- Each wheel in the train has a small amount of end shake. Nothing excessive. None lack a small amount of movement (or are tightly in there) 

- Wheels all seem to have their teeth in tact  

- Jewels appear clean, full, and with good holes. However i do wonder about the bottom pivot for the 3rd wheel  it looks like it’s a metal one. I’m having trouble seeing if that one is clean and structurally sound (see pic with the arrow)

- Clean, free movement of the train

- Listened to the movement - with my ear as I don’t have a proper rig to listen. To me I hear a pretty consistent ticking with the oddball double click. I also note I believe I’m hearing it tick strong to weaker to strong again. Not sure if that’s in my head or real...

Please take a look at the attached pictures. Let me know if you think I missed anything. I’m going to clean these pieces again, lubricate, and reassemble. I will test the free movement of the train as I go, try to achieve some recoil, and see what that gets me. I plan on also re-cleaning the Mainspring. I wonder if I over lubricated and it’s now slipping - would that be a possible culprit? 
I will post new timegrapher pics of dial up and down once I get thru this. 

Im happy to post more pics of any part you’d like to see more of if it helps. 
Thanks again! 
 

44154D10-51C7-4216-A768-F14A6D99666C.jpeg

A6649339-6D4D-40BD-A0DE-3317E1D7C191.jpeg

B2291550-A1F8-4B37-8AD5-7242062458FB.jpeg

219AAFD5-7463-42BB-9F99-46BEC7F450E8.jpeg

264C9A29-FA10-46B7-B999-DFFF613D44F1.jpeg

2F155626-9B35-4EEF-BC90-B31485C59978.jpeg

CFABCD5F-68B7-4FA4-88E3-B16FDE6A84BE.jpeg

B8C93461-2BA9-41BA-94E2-74C9619BC36E.jpeg

F85FCACC-1C62-4754-A61C-AC65858D8D6E.jpeg

9DBECAA2-7E6D-444E-92BE-62BD49CD5F01.jpeg

E8D58365-2EEB-406F-AB2F-5E81B6394D07.jpeg

E057F47E-3D61-4E40-AE36-7A62F6184687.jpeg

1F9A35CF-EC9A-47C6-9041-B3D1F654B9E0.jpeg

AD4F2721-7390-44CE-B824-7DBF33E8F840.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2019 at 2:06 PM, JohnR725 said:

It would be nice if you would give us timing results in another position as I assume you timed it dial down? So rotating into a crown position like crown down we can see if the results look the same. Then any time your graphical display doesn't look right then the numbers are not going to be correct either even if they look like valid numbers they probably aren't. Then one of the reasons we question year nifty app is in the past we've seen examples of bad timing results because the apps usually have inappropriate pickup devices to properly get the sounds from the watch to the app giving us goofy results.

Then for Rebanking I like the video below visually and audio is presented.

https://youtu.be/Rcqrb3_vin8

Then how are you cleaning the watch.

When you reassemble watch check the end shake of the wheels. It looks like from your bridge that it's only held in place by two screws it's possible that it's been bent down in the middle I just can't tell from the picture whether it has any support at the end or not.

RE: Cleaning

Disassemble. US bath in cleaning fluid. Three US bathes in rinse. Heat dry. Peg wood jewels. Rodico and peg wood as required to clean anything not captured in that process. Gloved hands throughout. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mzinski said:

Jewels appear clean, full, and with good holes. However i do wonder about the bottom pivot for the 3rd wheel  it looks like it’s a metal one. I’m having trouble seeing if that one is clean and structurally sound (see pic with the arrow)

Are you sure that isn't a missing jewel.

How many jewels do you count?
How many should there be?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎12‎/‎11‎/‎2019 at 11:07 AM, nickelsilver said:

Since it's regularly happening every 8 seconds I'm thinking a gearing problem; the 4th wheel has 8 teeth in its pinion, which will equate to 7.5 seconds per tooth "in action"- but it would be odd that all the teeth on that pinion or the 3rd wheel that drives it would be damaged and damaged equally. Though if for example the train bridge was removed with power on the watch the 3rd wheel teeth may have zipped accross another component raising burrs or something.

 

Is the train nice and free with the balance and fork out?

     ther is a lot to be said for " the sound of a watch ticking" !   after that,  how good it keeps time.     vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdm said:

So it seems, and the other picture shows an indiscernible blob.

Hi, thanks for your response. This was helpful in learning and gaining some help from the veterans and professionals here. 
FWIW I’m simply a hobbyist having fun and learning. Have not claimed to be anything I’m not. And I literally said I’m happy to provide more and better pics of anything to help see something. 
Instead of passive-aggressively replying it would have been far more beneficial and kind to simply say, “It’s hard to see ______, can you please add better pictures of ______?” If you find these help wanted post annoying, you always have the option of not replying or even reading. 
If I misread you reply, sorry. Forums can be hard to judge sometimes. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, mzinski said:

Instead of passive-aggressively replying it would have been far more beneficial and kind to simply say, “It’s hard to see ______, can you please add better pictures of ______?” If you find these help wanted post annoying, you always have the option of not replying or even reading. 
If I misread you reply, sorry. Forums can be hard to judge sometimes. 

Yes, you have much misread my reply which simply stated two simple facts. Don't blame forum misunderstandings when you are the first to use explicit aggressiveness. 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2019 at 1:05 PM, mzinski said:

Yes, it is an iPhone app called Timegrapher. While it’s not a dedicated timegrapher, I have been able to use it to successfully and consistently regulate a wide variety of movements (7750, 2784, 2824, 2836, 7420, 1120, 3135, 1215, etc). Of all the movements timed on this app, this is the only one to produce such a strange result. 

i have the timegrapher app is complete utter garbage, esp if you are using the headphones as the amp. spend $150 and get a cheap timegrapher 1000, they work well for the price and are suitable for the beginner.

the double clicking sound is it only in certain positions? worn down pallet pivots/balance staff, broken balance/pallet pivot jewels, bent staff, mis-shaped or untrue balance wheel can cause the safety roller to rub against the pallet in certain positions and can sound like double clicking. Does the extra click sound a little louder like metal on metal grinding?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, saswatch88 said:

i have the timegrapher app is complete utter garbage, esp if you are using the headphones as the amp. spend $150 and get a cheap timegrapher 1000, they work well for the price and are suitable for the beginner.

Ordered, thanks! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/13/2019 at 5:56 AM, AndyHull said:

Are you sure that isn't a missing jewel.

How many jewels do you count?
How many should there be?

 

The movement indicates 21. 
 

I count 21. 
4 - balance staff

1 - impulse

2 - pallet fork

2 - pallet

2 - escape wheel

1 - second wheel

1 - third wheel

2 - intermediate wheel

6 - reversing wheels

All accounted for. 
 

Waiting on new Timegrapher to arrive. Update will be forthcoming once it arrives. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...