Jump to content

Chinese clone horia tool


Recommended Posts

I would like a jeweling tool to practice correcting end shakes and also to install jewels. The Horia tool with a set of pushers/anvils is out of my budget at the moment.

I noticed a Chinese version

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000261581571.html?spm=a2g0o.detail.1000013.1.5ee15a59YGNywJ&gps-id=pcDetailBottomMoreThisSeller&scm=1007.13339.146401.0&scm_id=1007.13339.146401.0&scm-url=1007.13339.146401.0&pvid=c3dcc468-4930-4773-bc9c-319ccf7b9847

At first glance they look the same and being Chinese the price difference is huge, less than 10% of the Swiss version but too expensive to take a wild punt. Some Chinese tools and equipment i have purchased have been absolutely brilliant. Does anybody have any experience with this tool?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Complete from the US, box, vintage look and all.
https://www.ebay.it/itm/Seitz-Jeweling-tool-set-with-reamers-pushers-anvils/274079345666

about £300, maybe use a reshipper to lessen customs charges.

I have nothing against the Chinese, it's just that in this case their value proposition is not that compelling.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you don't like the Chinese version can you return it?

Visually it looks really really close to the Horia. One of the problems I found from buying Chinese stuff that visually what you think you're purchasing isn't always entirely what you get.

Then for the Seitz versus Horia tool? if you're going to insert new jewels you're going to have to acquire the Seitz tool as it has the reamers that you're going to need. Then it will let you push the jewels in so one tool does it all. But the Horia tool is so much nicer for pushing the jewels and adjusting end shake. So the absolute best world would be to have both of them.

 

https://www.horia.ch/en/Products/Jewellling-Setting-staking-tools.html

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

if you don't like the Chinese version can you return it?

Visually it looks really really close to the Horia. One of the problems I found from buying Chinese stuff that visually what you think you're purchasing isn't always entirely what you get.

Then for the Seitz versus Horia tool? if you're going to insert new jewels you're going to have to acquire the Seitz tool as it has the reamers that you're going to need. Then it will let you push the jewels in so one tool does it all. But the Horia tool is so much nicer for pushing the jewels and adjusting end shake. So the absolute best world would be to have both of them.

 

https://www.horia.ch/en/Products/Jewellling-Setting-staking-tools.html

Thanks for the info John. This is the first jewel I need to remove. It's from a Rolex clone movement. I have another scrap movement I can source a jewel from. Will the Chinese horia tool not suffice to complete this task? 

20191208_040613.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tools mentioned here so far all probably do the same job, but they are not exactly the same. Since I do not know why the differences myself I will make a summary

  • Seitz shown above all have a (detachable) lever, and I suppose, 4mm pushers and anvils. Some use guidance is provided (attached)
  • Chinese doesn't have a lever.
  • Horia has various types:
    - No lever, 3mm or 4mm spindle (the latter is more "standard" I think), regular of fine thread, that I can probably understand.
    - With lever, come in two types: free or guided spindle, not sure why to chose one over the other.
    - With lever and bigger spindles.
    Their boxed sets include both first two types, as if the serious Watchmaker couldn't do without.

But for the amateur and/or budget minded professional the best deal is always a basic tool on Ebay, then add the bits as needed.



 

2001_J31073.pdf

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, AP1875 said:

Thanks for the info John. This is the first jewel I need to remove. It's from a Rolex clone movement. I have another scrap movement I can source a jewel from. Will the Chinese horia tool not suffice to complete this task?

both tools will work fine.

Normally when people are replacing broken jewels when fitting a new  jewel  it will more than likely be sized differently  which is why you would need to  ream out the hole for proper fit. As you already have a proper replacement jewel that will not need to be done.

lever versus micrometer head?  Conceivably with the lever you'll have much more pushing force.   The micrometer head in my opinion  gives you much more precise  adjustments..

then the 3 mm versus the 4 mm? The older horia tool tool that I have has a spindle of 3 mm with a base of 4 mm..  The Seitz set both the base and the spindle are 4 mm. So for compatibility reasons it's nice  to have everything at 4 mm for interchangeability..

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

both tools will work fine.

Normally when people are replacing broken jewels when fitting a new  jewel  it will more than likely be sized differently  which is why you would need to  ream out the hole for proper fit. As you already have a proper replacement jewel that will not need to be done.

lever versus micrometer head?  Conceivably with the lever you'll have much more pushing force.   The micrometer head in my opinion  gives you much more precise  adjustments..

then the 3 mm versus the 4 mm? The older horia tool tool that I have has a spindle of 3 mm with a base of 4 mm..  The Seitz set both the base and the spindle are 4 mm. So for compatibility reasons it's nice  to have everything at 4 mm for interchangeability..

 

 

That's great thanks. I think i'll give the chinese one a go.

A question regarding changing jewels. Are you saying if i didn't have a replacement i would not find the exact sized jewel to fit so i would have to ream out the hole and fit one with a larger diameter? The inside measurement would always have to be the same though, in this case for the centre wheel to pass through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AP1875 said:

A question regarding changing jewels. Are you saying if i didn't have a replacement i would not find the exact sized jewel to fit so i would have to ream out the hole and fit one with a larger diameter? The inside measurement would always have to be the same though, in this case for the centre wheel to pass through.

this is watch repair anything is possible? This means that if you look on the catalog  pages of the attached PDF you may find the exact size jewel you're looking for. But is also the possibility of the various watch companies using their own jewels and the outside diameters might not correspond to the jewel sizes found on the catalog page.

5006 A_a_F Seitz jewels.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

this is watch repair anything is possible? This means that if you look on the catalog  pages of the attached PDF you may find the exact size jewel you're looking for. But is also the possibility of the various watch companies using their own jewels and the outside diameters might not correspond to the jewel sizes found on the catalog page.

5006 A_a_F Seitz jewels.pdf 2.03 MB · 0 downloads

i bet those sets aren't cheap. i'm sure i can order individual ones from Cousins though.

Next problem.... what is best best way to measure the inside diameter of a jewel, they're so small

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you go to the link below scroll down to the section titled Joseph School of Watch Making And realistically download the entire book because it has really useful information. But you looking at section titled Unit 9b - Friction Jeweling. That is going to answer a lot of questions maybe not all of them but that would get you started.

https://www.mybulova.com/vintage-bulova-catalogs

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I thought i'd bump this instead of starting a new thread.

The Chinese tool arrived. I have adjusted end shakes on a few movements to get the feel of it. It works the same way as the Horia tool and has 0.01mm of slack so if you need 0.04mm correction you push 0.05 etc.

So i need to press in this jewel. I have pressed a few out of 2824 clone movements and it was super easy, i just took the measurements before and then placed them back on top.

Now i have to press this jewel into the Rolex clone movement i'm a little bit nervous, i can't get another one... So thought i'd ask a couple of questions here, if anyone would be kind enough to help me out?

1. As i can't take a measurement, is the only way to achieve the correct end shake placing the movement back together and keep taking it apart until the end shake feels right?

2. Does this jewel in the picture only go in one way (centre jewel)? I cant work out if one side is different to the other.

1790873318_2blX7u4TBWEIBgzr79zQ.thumb.jpg.a843a020c5d3ce2d02eb6766662832f8.jpg

fullsizeoutput_71d.thumb.jpeg.54105a18f6fa40f61079575ab7d3ace0.jpeg

 

fullsizeoutput_71e.thumb.jpeg.c9597b18053e73bb5aca3458158ba2f6.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that you mention the "slack". Just so that I understand, if you back off the micrometer, then bring it down and touch the jewel, you get .01 movement on the mic scale before the pusher starts moving the jewel? That would be a different situation than the normal backlash in a screw, where there is slack or slop when reversing the movement of the mic.

Have fun with your tool!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The extra hundredth thing is a thing with pretty much every jeweling tool I've used, including Seitz, Favorite, Chatons SA, and Horia. I tend to use the lever types, but Horia screw types are similar. Think of the stack up of parts- the stump, the watch plate, the jewel, the pusher, the interface of pusher to spindle, then finally the micrometric screw. A micron or two of slop or mushiness here, another there, that it's typically only a hundredth is pretty fantastic.

 

As for orienting the jewel, if it's truly symmetric put it however you want. If there is an oil sink (however slight), that goes opposite the wheel.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I dont understand why a patreon membership would have limited places ??
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy. It’s highly unlikely you will be able to purchase a new bezel look on eBay for a pulsar watch for repair to find a bezel.
    • just one little minor reminder here this isn't your normal balance wheel.  pages 17 and 18 are what you really want to be looking at. normally studs don't turn but this watch has the etachron system designed for lots of adjustment. Personally I would try to rotate the stud back to where it's supposed to be. If you're lucky you didn't actually bend it at the stud it just looks really bad as the stud has been rotated grossly out of position.. I think things will look a lot better if you put the hairspring back where it's supposed to be by rotating the stud. it's hard to tell if you actually did bend it at the stud or not we won't know until you rotate the stud back more or less where it's supposed to be. Then you want to pay attention to the manual of how to put the hairspring back in the regulator pins because yes they rotate also and they rotated specific directions otherwise bad things will happen to your hairspring. so initially you can open up the regulator as wide as it can go and don't worry about closing it until thing everything is right then you can close them a little bit
    • I need to see photos of the whole movement before I comment. 
    • Hi @Jon, so, from one extreme to another the beat error is 0.1(min.pos) to 0.2(msx.pos), and as you mentioned the rate does up and down dramatically. Also checked the position of the collet, and the collet is not central to the jewel on the balance cock. Balance moves freely, per my understanding.   So, after 24h the ampl. fell down by approx 20 deg, which I would assume is expected. After adjusting the endshake I believe I gained around +10 deg. of balance movement. Which is great, and overall the balance is not at 220'ish deg.   What I did next, some might think is non-orthodox, but was wort a try. I too the mainspring out, checked again for endshake and if the pin moves freely, and cleaned everything. Usually when installing the mainspring I would use some barrel grease on the barrel walls, install the spring and put a 2-3 drops of D-5 oil on top of the wounded spring and in the places where the arbor sits. This time I took the spring and applied a ultra this coat of Molykote Dx paste on the whole spring, before installing it in to the barrel, and added some oil to the arbor as usual.  The result improved, at a full wound the balance produces about 230-237 deg. @JohnR725 I'm getting closer to 300 😃   What I am noticing, there is a fluctuation in amplitude. With time it would rise and drop about total 8-10 deg in an interval about 2 minutes. I assumed this ruled out the power transfer from the barrel itself. So I took the gear train out, cleaned and lubed. 
×
×
  • Create New...