Jump to content

Tweezers


sjhilbel

Recommended Posts

My first question on the forum. I am a watch repair novice.

Tweezers are an essential for watch repair. Many are steel or another hard metal, but there are brass ones to prevent scratching.

Is there a reason to use both types? Why would you not use brass tweezers all the time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many people use brass or nickel tweezers for pretty much all work except where finer or more specialized tweezers are necessary. Most professionals I know use brass/nickel for majority of their work. Not only are they less prone to mark parts, they are very easy and quick to dress, and being slightly soft compared to steel, they tend to hold parts better without them flying away.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually have some bronze tweezers,  for me they hold up a bit better than brass,  but have similar non-scratch qualities. 

But I am a non-professional, and I have to protect my poor watches from my clumsiness :-)

I think it's worth trying as many types as is feasible for you, it's interesting how different various tweezers can feel and behave as you use them. 

Tweezers inevitably fall pointy end down, bends the tips on brass every time, bronze sometimes, fancy steel usually survives. That's a good thing, as I don't relish the idea of trying to dress my Dumont #5's.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely brass for me (Dumont 1AM), for general handling. Very grippy and no chance of scratching steel parts. That's good for a part-time amateur like me. I've hardly used anything else since I bought them and even though I dropped them (pointy-end down of course) after two days, they were easy to straighten and file back into shape. I haven't tried bronze, but I imagine I would get on with them equally well. Steel I prefer for the fine-pointed (#4 and #5) tweezers I use when I (rarely) tackle a hairspring or suchlike. Brass is too soft and flexible. I try to avoid using tweezers of any sort when handling jewels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the group Stirky. You can search for just about every subject in the craft here. Don't be afraid to ask if you can't find the answer that may have already been covered ( some ad nauseum LOL ). You don't have to buy Bergeon to get good quality. There are many decent mid-range tools available that will last you a lifetime. Cousins would be a good place to start . Cheers from across the pond ! Randy
    • I picked up a similar amount of these jewels some years ago in a watch and clock fair. Every now and then they come in handy. This week I've got a rubbed in bombe jewel in the balance cock that is cracked and needs replacing. Very handy to have a vintage assortment of these type of jewels!
    • Great diagram with the teeth and pinion count. Simple way to reduce the speed of the hour wheel by the 12:1 minute wheel. Genius and yet so simple. Always good to reinforce the principal by what you have done in your drawing. Keep doing that. I had a drawing on my wall for years showing me this which is very similar to the drawing you have done. Here's a formula to work out the beats per hour of a watch movement. The movement's BPH is dictated by the wheel teeth and pinion count and the hairspring being vibrated to the correct BPH by finding the pinning up point on the hairspring using a vibrating tool.  The reason in the formula there is X2 on the top line is because there are two pallet stones.
    • So I just wanted to say "thank you" again.  The angle is the key bit it seems and yes, it did basically just fall, or float, back into position when I got it lined up just right. I had meant to add that now that I see how it goes in, I totally see how it came out in the first place, and that whomever cloned the original movement didn't pay much attention to the fine details around the setting or how it interfaces with the balance cock or the "rings" on the regulator and/or stud carrier arms.
×
×
  • Create New...