Jump to content

Removing the balance...


mwilkes

Recommended Posts

Evening all

Just wondering how you folks generally remove the balance & cock from your movement!

In general, you see people simply lifting the cock out with the balance dangling from it.

In my (limited!) experience, more often than not I find this distorts the hairspring on everything except modern ETA movements

How do you lift yours? :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evening all
Just wondering how you folks generally remove the balance & cock from your movement!
In general, you see people simply lifting the cock out with the balance dangling from it.
In my (limited!) experience, more often than not I find this distorts the hairspring on everything except modern ETA movements
How do you lift yours? :-)

I have seen Mark lift the balance and cock with tweezers, as I be unit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evening all
Just wondering how you folks generally remove the balance & cock from your movement!
In general, you see people simply lifting the cock out with the balance dangling from it.
In my (limited!) experience, more often than not I find this distorts the hairspring on everything except modern ETA movements
How do you lift yours? :-)


Depends on the mov’t. If it looks like balance might get hung up as I lift the cock away I’ll gently hold both together. Otherwise I’ll, gently lift the cock away and let the balance dangle beneath. You dry a balance and hairspring by hanging the cock on a tack and letting the balance dangle without harm, so as long as nothing gets hung up upon removing the balance and cock this way I don’t see any harm.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I raise the cock just enough to take lower pivot out of the jewel hole and housing, let the pivot rest on mainplate, then disconnect the cock from mainplate, move the cock put it on top of  gears bridge, run one prong of tweezers inside the wheel , then hold the cock and balance in tweezers and lift. No dangling at all.

I make sure to carry out the whole operation at very low height above ground or bench. 

Best wishes.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi   I use the same method as Nucejoe and never had a problem over many years doing it. The essence is to take great care in freeing the lower pivot and roller assembly before lifting away from the movement.  Then lay the cock on its back with the balance on top and place under cover for protection.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I asked this question some time ago, I was given good advice; carefully free the cock from the mainplate, and lift the cock while tilting the movement to cause it to be on the same plane as the balance wheel.  Give the the movement the slightest of taps, only enough to free the balance wheel.  It has worked for me every time. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, saswatch88 said:

letting balance dangle should not distort the spring, their is a reason why they have balance tacks

It should not but it could, plus it leave the most delicate part exposed to dust and external events, I have no knowledge of any good reason for an hairsping to not lie flat during its entire life. So it's sound and good advice that cock and balance are put spring up  in a small box or in the covered tray. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jdm said:

It should not but it could, plus it leave the most delicate part exposed to dust and external events, I have no knowledge of any good reason for an hairsping to not lie flat during its entire life. So it's sound and good advice that cock and balance are put spring up  in a small box or in the covered tray. 

for extended periods of time yes it could but during a cleaning its perfectly fine. its good practice to keep all or any exposed watch parts under a lid while re assembling. i have a parts tray that comes with a lid and a small plastic shot glass i use to put over the balance tack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saswatch88 said:

for extended periods of time yes it could but during a cleaning its perfectly fine.

I don't think it's fine for any amount of time, because incidents can happen at any time.

Also, what I do when I disassemble for cleaning is that parts go straight from the mov't to the mesh tray. And balance and tack go to a dedicated small glass container. That minimize the chances of dropping parts during and saves a bit of time also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jdm said:

I don't think it's fine for any amount of time, because incidents can happen at any time.

Also, what I do when I disassemble for cleaning is that parts go straight from the mov't to the mesh tray. And balance and tack go to a dedicated small glass container. That minimize the chances of dropping parts during and saves a bit of time also.

i guess you never heard of vibrating hairsprings and adjusting beat error

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Of all the issues I have never mastered in watchmaking, dealing with the Balance is the worse. I hate to see a dangling hairspring—just seems wrong to me. But, as I stated above, I've never mastered working on or handling a balance wheel/cock assembly. Good to see the experts relate how they handle this process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DavidMasters said:

Of all the issues I have never mastered in watchmaking, dealing with the Balance is the worse. I hate to see a dangling hairspring—just seems wrong to me. But, as I stated above, I've never mastered working on or handling a balance wheel/cock assembly. Good to see the experts relate how they handle this process.

The biggest fear is dropping the balance cock and balance while removing it from the watch and distorting the hairspring.  I lift the balance cock and do dangle the hairspring as i am more nervous grabbing the two together to remove.  I do keep all things low, so if i do accidentally drop the balance, chances are it will survive and the hairspring will be in tact.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, I use a few methods but still read the other answers to see what is currently popular.. I always take a moment to think about which way is likely to be the best for the watch at hand.

Back when I was starting out there was one hairspring which got warped when lifting the balance while hanging from the bridge (after the first which was destroyed on my first parts movement), and it put me off doing that in future. For a long time I got to grips with lifting the balance and bridge as one with the tweezers providing support rather than any real grip. It wasn't until a few years ago that I got the courage back (partly while going through some repetitive practice disassembling and reassembling a movement, getting bored) after watching someone lifting the balance out with it hanging by the hairspring, that I started to re-try and use that method. On the newer watches it can often work, particularly as these generally have light weight balance wheels.

Sometimes I have unfastened the hairspring stud in place, then lifted the balance bridge away first, and I've occasionally used (with tweezers in both hands) the method of supporting the balance from underneath rather than gripping - while holding and lifting the bridge with the 2nd set of tweezers.. I used to be particularly dexterous.

Realistically, the best thing is to try a few methods and see what works the best for you.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

My original response to this question was before I took Mark's courses and observed his method.  It's simple, doesn't take any particular dexterity acrobatics, and if followed, seems it would be very difficult to ruin, disfigure or break anything. 

1.  loosen and remove balance cock screw, set aside in tray.

2.  gently prize the cock from its position, rotate only the cock about 20° clockwise.

3.  put one tweezer tip below the balance wheel, and the other above the cock, getting a hold of it in such a way that the top pivot stays in the balance cock's jewel.

4.  the most difficult part, removing cock and balance wheel as one complete unit, with the top pivot seated in its jewel takes a bit of practice, but is by no means extraordinarily difficult.  make certain nothing inside the tweezers touches the centerwheel or bridge.   

5.  flip the entire unit over, and set it down in the tray (I put it in the same compartment as the cock's screw).  Give the tray a bit of a twist to confirm the wheel is in its jewel hole.  Cover and store.   

Edited by SparkyLB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you watch Mark's video carefully, he lifted both the upper and lower pivots out of the jewel holes before he gripped the balance and cock as one unit.

If the upper pivot is still in the upper jewel, the pivot could get damaged when using this technique. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SparkyLB said:

My original response to this question was before I took Mark's courses and observed his method.  It's simple, doesn't take any particular dexterity acrobatics, and if followed, seems it would be very difficult to ruin, disfigure or break anything. 

1.  loosen and remove balance cock screw, set aside in tray.

2.  gently prize the cock from its position, rotate only the cock about 20° clockwise.

3.  put one tweezer tip below the balance wheel, and the other above the cock, getting a hold of it in such a way that the top pivot stays in the balance cock's jewel.

4.  the most difficult part, removing cock and balance wheel as one complete unit, with the top pivot seated in its jewel takes a bit of practice, but is by no means extraordinarily difficult.  make certain nothing inside the tweezers touches the centerwheel or bridge.   

5.  flip the entire unit over, and set it down in the tray (I put it in the same compartment as the cock's screw).  Give the tray a bit of a twist to confirm the wheel is in its jewel hole.  Cover and store.   

Isn't keeping pivot seated in jewel hole risky?  The pivot is safer if free to move and that is when its out of the jewel hole.

A dexterious stunt I saw my late watchmaker show off, he raise the bridge about a cm while holding the movement and snapped two fingers of the same hand balance jumped out dangling from the bridge.

The biggest advantage of dangling balance is both pivots being out of jewel holes. You can keep this advantage and avoid dangling balance.

joe

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nucejoe, you make a good point.  Agreed.  Given the slender dimensions of the pivot on the balance wheel; perhaps it is wiser to keep the pivot and hole divorced during the transfer.  As mentioned, during storage, it is inverted (cock down) and the pivot in its hole.  Thank you.  I'm still learning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes I have that in my watch list a JUF if cheap enough I will have a go , if nothing else it will be good for spares, I have a few JUF’s
    • Less give a damn- more **BLEEP** it! …nice that it is keeping time I’ve done a couple of these (one with your assistance) and there’s a third that needs work on the tension between what drives the hands and the barrel. Did you have any issue with that? …and I saw Ranfft make a small comment in a thread re: pin pallets- a couple drops of Tillwich blu, let it run down the pins. It is good for 20 degrees of amplitude… I’m using this oil as a cheat code on my unmotivated Venus chrono…
    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
×
×
  • Create New...