Jump to content

Balance end shake puzzle


rduckwor

Recommended Posts

An Elgin 673 movement that came to me as a non-runner. Cleaned and lubricated. It will run moderately well only in the dial down position with the cock sitting partially down on the steady pins.  Seating the cock fully results in a non-runner.  I have had the balance complete off the cock and cleaned the jewels and end stone well.  No chance of reversing the stones as these are secured by screws and fixed settings.  Pivots look fine under magnification and were well pithed. Testing the balance when assembled, there appears to be zero end shake.  It puzzles me as to how the movement might have come to this state.  Pretty heavy cock to have been bent somehow.  I will try shimming the balance cock to see if that improves it's function.   Ideas very welcome.

 

Thanks,


RMD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parts for older watches may need some final finishing... I think watchmakers back in the day accepted this as part of the repair process!.

Another thing with watches made in the 50s is that there were both 'shock-protected' and 'non shock-protected' watches of one particular calibre and sometimes these required different size/length staffs. Somebody could have attempted a repair and gave it up as a bad job when the part didn't fit..and it ended up with you!. For all you know the balance may even be from a different watch!

I would first of all observe the balance roller jewel and pallet fork interaction..the balance roller should sit in the pallet fork without touching the safety pin. If you're satisfied with that then go ahead and see if a metal foil shim works.

If the roller jewel sits too high in the pallet fork then you have to shorten the balance staff to bring the balance lower. On some watches it is possible to drive the balance jewel setting deeper in the plate to achieve the same thing but googling the Elgin 763 I don't believe it is possible as the end jewel is screwed to the plate (maybe you can shim the end jewel?).

Good luck!

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello!  Does anybody have this tool?  This is mine.  If you have one, does it look complete?  How do you use it.  (I have the instruction sheet but it's hard to read!)  thanks!
    • @JohnR725 that's very helpful.  I appreciate the time you took to give those instructions and post the pictures.  below is a picture of my staff, which looks identical to the ones you posted.  The approx measurements I got are: .772 on the left part of the staff; .715 on the right side of the hub; the hub is 1.107; and the overall length (minus the broken pivot) is 5.248; which seem to line up with the measurements you posted.  I didn't think to measure the pivot, which I'll do if there's enough of one left on the staff.  Thanks again.
    • Thank you to both of you!  I've been somewhat derailed by this quandary for a couple of days now. I am guessing that the point of the wider tweezers is to support the whole spring at the same time in an effort to prevent it going under tension... I have already discovered the Zen of a clutter free space, and trying to keep my work well away from the edge, however the most terrifying of the flights wasn't so short, I had my work in the middle of the table and nothing else around.  That particular launch was towards me.  I distinctly recall feeling the spring hit my left hand as it escaped.  I only found it by dumb luck, on the floor, between the legs of my chair.  I need to order a pack of replacements just in case.  I think I recall a thread discussing where to find them, and the differences between the clones and the authentic ETA ones, pointing out that they're not interchangeable (the clones being longer IIRC).  Now I just have to find that thread again.  What I haven't mastered is the zen of the search function here.  I'm sure I"ll get that down eventually. So this is similar to, but different from one of the posts I had found in my original searches (or maybe I'm just hallucinating, I can't find the post I thought I remember).  The bits about the corner filled in a gap in what I'd read before.  At least I have a more clear picture in my head about what needs to happen now.  Yes, I've learned about how touchy these springs are.  What I'm not sure I have a good grasp on is the understanding of what causes the spring to flex, other than to say "the slightest little touch"  I think I'm going to try a small bit of Rodico to position the spring next time.
    • I think it's stamped on the inside cover. 309 I think.
    • Hi all, needing a little help. I have an old Casio AQ-321G, but have no idea what battery it takes. I've looked around online, but cannot see anything... I see a 309 stamped on the case back, could this be it....? Can you please help, below are some pictures:
×
×
  • Create New...