Jump to content

Misaligned day disc in ETA 1164 movement


Stian

Recommended Posts

Hi gurus, 

I'm working on an ETA 1164 triple calendar movement and the day disc does not line up well with its window, see picture. The jumper action seems fine and there are three jumpers for the date mechanism which are all identical. Thus mixing them up should not matter.

Has anyone incurred such issues before with this movement? Is the only remedy to adjust the profile of the jumper?

-- 

Best regards,
Stian

20191122_122345.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen this on a movement with an incorrect jumper spring where the spring action was too weak to snap the wheel into position.

On the 1664 the different jumper springs have different part numbers (2571 vs. 2583). Likely the springs (and jumpers) are the same as you say but I'd recommend rechecking just to be sure. You shouldn't have to be reshaping a jumper's profile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

I've seen this on a movement with an incorrect jumper spring where the spring action was too weak to snap the wheel into position.

On the 1664 the different jumper springs have different part numbers (2571 vs. 2583). Likely the springs (and jumpers) are the same as you say but I'd recommend rechecking just to be sure. You shouldn't have to be reshaping a jumper's profile.

Thanks for your response! You're saying 1664 but I assume you meant 1164? I haven't found the tech sheet for it, would you by any chance be able to share it? 

-- 
Best regards,
Stian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like you I found the tech sheet for the 1164 elusive! I instead took a look at Cousins, who are pretty reliable on detailing parts correctly, and noted different part numbers for the day and months springs. [There was also https://www.spareparts-watches.com/product/992214/eta-1164]. Knowing I've had a similar problem to yours with an incorrect (= too weak) spring then I made my suggestion.

Having a bit more time today to look around I've only been able to find the 1164 in Bestfit:

image.thumb.png.ebff85af061b6b70fc4fd5229dc5ef51.png

However from this it's now clear that the 2571 part I mentioned is a different beast to the 2583! As you said the springs you're interested in are the same despite different numbers so 2583 (month jumper spring) = 2573 (day jumper spring) = 2575 (date jumper spring). Same story for the jumper levers themselves.

Long story short ... you can probably ignore my initial suggestion! I think all you can do at this stage is (re)check free lever and spring movement and that there is nothing rubbing.

Good luck! 

Edited by WatchMaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Stian,
I'm currently working on a watch with an ETA 1164 caliber, and I need a date lever (ref 2566). Is there any chance that you have one in spare part?
By advance, thank you! You can reach me at amory [dot] papavero [at] gmail [dot] com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant recall working on these, but would like to suggest that if (with the dial removed) the wheel snaps over nicely, the dial is not impeding it in any way and it is off set for all days, could it be that the wheel is out of phase with the drive ratchet. That is the wheel may have slipped on its centre. (hope you understand what I'm getting at)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 2/13/2020 at 5:07 AM, Nucejoe said:

The gear attached to the back of day disc is normally just rivetted on which If not snug tight can be the cause of misalignment.

Thanks a lot, this was indeed it. I actually didn't read your post and figured it out myself, which only shows I would have saved some grey hair had I followed my own thread better ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...