Jump to content

Power reserve question?


Recommended Posts

I am assuming it depends on the watch, but generally, and wearing over a 24 hour period,  how much energy can a rotor typically input into the power reserve.

And secondly if your watch is in the last 25% of it's power reserve will that cause the watch to speed up slightly? 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends how active the wearer is. I would have thought someone regularly on the move would keep it +/- 90% powered. The converse is true. At 25% reserve it may still keep good time but if anything would surely slow down if anything as the power ebbs away.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AdamC said:

At 25% reserve it may still keep good time but if anything would surely slow down if anything as the power ebbs away.

Actually as the power reserve gets low the principal impact on the balance is on amplitude which drops considerably.

Counterintuitively this can actually result in an increase in rate and the watch can speed up as the power reserve gets very low, although I've never quite worked out the mechanism behind this effect, but I have observed it. I suspect that it is due to the relationship between momentum, static friction, and dynamic friction breaking down at very low amplitudes and energy levels and the impact that this has on the oscillating system.

The degree to which this effect can be observed will also vary from watch to watch depending on how much clearance there is between the curb pin and the boot on the regulator. In an ideal world the gap between the two will be exactly equal to the thickness of the hair spring resulting in the H/S being always in contact with one or the other and the effective H/S length remaining constant throughout each balance oscillation.

In reality the clearance is usually slightly greater than the thickness of the H/S which means that for a fraction of the balance rotation the H/S is not in contact with either boot or curb pin and the effective length of the H/S increases to its full length. With good amplitude the impact that this has on timing is insignificant but as the amplitude decreases with reduced power from the M/S the proportion of the balance swing that is on the full H/S length rather than the regulated H/S length increases and the effect that this has on slowing the rate increases. Also the greater the gap between the curb pin and the boot the greater this effect will be.

This will obviously counter any increase in the rate that may result from the very low amplitude resulting from low M/S power.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that the exact impact on rate as M/S power reduces is almost impossible to predict as there are at least two mechanisms in play which counter each other to variable degres.

A rotor can in theory keep the main spring fully wound all the time if it is continually moving at an appropriate rate and in the right direction (remember not all auto winding systems are bi-directional), and the autowinding system is in an appropriate state of repair.

As @AdamC says though it is highly dependent on the level of activity of the wearer.

For a real life example though I have a Vostock Amphibia with a 2416b auto-wind movement. This has a quick set date that requires cycling back and through the midnight point to correct the date if required, and becaouse of the wobbly crown characteristic of the Amphibia this is a PITA so I keep it on a winder when not wearing it. The winder rotates for 1 hour in every 4 at about 9rpm. Left on this winder for over two weeks at a time this watch has never stopped so I would suggest that the input from the winder is pretty close to the output of the watch running.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Actually as the power reserve gets low the principal impact on the balance is on amplitude which drops considerably.
Counterintuitively this can actually result in an increase in rate and the watch can speed up as the power reserve gets very low, although I've never quite worked out the mechanism behind this effect, but I have observed it."

Perhaps with a lower amplitude there's not a proportional reduction in angular velocity of the balance? Lower amplitude at same angular velocity would give a higher rate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An hour on wrist fully winds brand new pieces. Actual power reserve declines due to wear and dried lubricants. High speed reversers in winder module push the oil out  of bearing, which is a principle cause of selfwinder deficiency.

Clockboy told about his experience with use of fixodrop, which I think helps keep the oil in, therefore maintains good winder efficiency.

No need to live with an inefficient winder, just service it. 

Best

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

High speed reversers in winder module push the oil out  of bearing, which is a principle cause of selfwinder deficiency.

That is, if there are reverser wheels and such complications. Seiko (on most movʼs) has been doing without since some 60 years using the magic lever. It still requires periodic service but it's a much more compact and simpler system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jdm said:

That is, if there are reverser wheels and such complications. Seiko (on most movʼs) has been doing without since some 60 years using the magic lever. It still requires periodic service but it's a much more compact and simpler system. 

Right, Perhaps Seiko felt smart trying to do without reversers yet ended up with its sophisticated excenter mess, to match a date jump always hanging in between half of yesterday and the rest of today. lol or whatever.    Best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Right, Perhaps Seiko felt smart trying to do without reversers yet ended up with its sophisticated excenter mess, to match a date jump always hanging in between half of yesterday and the rest of today. lol or whatever.    Best

Yes, I'm sure they "felt smart" in selling millions of pieces :biggrin:
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Getting back to the issue which is us guys repairing or just enjoying horological exploits. The big worry now is how sound is Cousins as company going forward. The of cost if this 8 year legal battle will be astronomical. Cut backs will happen noticed already how the Cousins catalogue is half its size this year. The main supplier going out of business will hit the UK horological community in a big way.    On the Brexit issue it was about a sovereign country being able to make its own laws and trade with any country in the world. I cannot see what was wrong with this. For those who wish to re join the cost would be very high indeed.
    • Yes, it's the same (old) song and it's getting worse & worse;  
    • 🤔 leaving the EU meant that UK was no longer part of the convention and have already been turned down an independent reapplication. I'm pretty sure courts have to be held in Switzerland in this case. There will be a lot more watches stashed away in draws  tbh, folk wont be able to afford to maintain them. Cheap watches will be bought and top end watches by folk with plenty of cash that can pay for service and repair. The expensive once in a lifetime gifts and everything else inbetween will be at the forgotton when they stop working. I know i was being a numpty, get used to it 😄 Anybody that knows will boycott them, but besides repairers who will know. Nope will never buy one, i made that decision as soon as i learnt about this. 
    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
×
×
  • Create New...