Jump to content

O-ring lubrication


DPhillip

Recommended Posts

Hello, 

I was replacing batteries in two watches - a Pulsar over 20 years old and a year-old Timex, and I used an Esslinger silicon lubrication/grease kit to lube the o-rings in the watch backs.  The kit consists of sponges in a plastic jar, soaked in the silicon grease.  

Both o-rings expanded, making it impossible to re-seat the watch backs. The Pulsar back screws down, the Timex is a press fit.  I actually tested the fit on the Timex before installing a new battery and lubing the o-ring, as I had trouble with the Pulsar o-ring earlier and I wanted to record what happened.  As soon as I lubed the Timex o-ring, it got bigger - putting any pressure on the watch back causes the ring to ooze out one side or the other.

Any thoughts on what is going on here?  Esslinger has a good rep, I thought; I never figured their silicon grease product would cause something like this.

Is there anything I can do to shrink the Timex o-ring?  The Pulsar o-ring needs to be replaced - it is old anyhow.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  O  rings expand:  esslinger screwed up.   probably bought chineeze rings with out specified the "rubber formula".   o rings made in the US and UK have a "specifide grease"  for each ring.   this happens with hydrolic seals also.   TO BE SAFE,  use Vasoline.  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Vinn is right the grease should not make any difference to the the ring other than coat it,  The grease may have a carrier liquid which is reacting with the sealing rings (being absorbed)  Try  dropping the rings into boiling water it may help shrink it, it used to work on dictating machine drive bands. If it works do what Vinn suggests and use vaseline. I use a tube of DOW CORNING silicone grease I used at work as a heat transfer for large transistors a s a thermal comductor  it works ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Vinn is right the grease should not make any difference to the the ring other than coat it,  The grease may have a carrier liquid which is reacting with the sealing rings (being absorbed)  Try  dropping the rings into boiling water it may help shrink it, it used to work on dictating machine drive bands. If it works do what Vinn suggests and use vaseline. I use a tube of DOW CORNING silicone grease I used at work as a heat transfer for large transistors a s a thermal comductor  it works ok.

     it does make a difference.  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2019 at 11:45 PM, DPhillip said:

Both o-rings expanded, making it impossible to re-seat the watch backs. 

I don't know of what these o-rings are made of, but as others have said the NBR normally used never expands and the grease actually helps keeping it in place. I suggest that you replace these and switch to a different grease. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried boiling the o ring and then using a heat gun on it.  Neither worked.  As soon as I pressed the back into place the ring oozed out of the groove a quarter of an inch.  The watch is only a small lady's Timex.  Bizarre.  I have to get a new o-ring, clearly.

Also, I test-fit the back and o-ring on the watch before using this silicon grease and it clicked into place just fine with no problem.  

So if we want to expand o-rings, perhaps to take out some enemy's missile program, this stuff is the ticket! 

BTW I emailed Esslinger about it - no reply.  

To be clear, the grease is an Esslinger product - the watch was made in India - not sure where they source their o-rings.

DP

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...