Jump to content

adjusting lower jewel


AP1875

Recommended Posts

I need to adjust the main plate lower jewel, move it down slightly. Would i use a staking set to accomplish this?

If so, i will purchase one. Is there anything i should look for in a set? Looks like another rabbit hole, lots of different options and parts you can buy..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to adjust the main plate lower jewel, move it down slightly. Would i use a staking set to accomplish this?
If so, i will purchase one. Is there anything i should look for in a set? Looks like another rabbit hole, lots of different options and parts you can buy..

Is this on a pocket watch? Is the jewel friction fit? Need some photos. I would use a seitz jeweling set.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

it is an automatic movement, Chinese. I would also like to practice removing the jewels on automatic movements and replacing them with new. i have an eta 2824, 2892 and 7750.I'm just curious, something i want to learn. I don't really come across pocket watches, just the modern automatics (if that makes a difference?). Any advice appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,
it is an automatic movement, Chinese. I would also like to practice removing the jewels on automatic movements and replacing them with new. i have an eta 2824, 2892 and 7750.I'm just curious, something i want to learn. I don't really come across pocket watches, just the modern automatics (if that makes a difference?). Any advice appreciated.

I have a lot of videos on YouTube addressing watch repair, and I think one of replacing jewels.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes staking set is possible. Usually easier when the jewel is flat with the plate. It it is inset then you have no way of controlling play. I pressed out a broken jewel on an omega chronograph plate and replaced it with a random identical jewel from a Russian movement. It was flat with the mainplate so a larger staking tool with a flat bottom did fine. I did cross my fingers when I did it. 

Seitz tool ideal. Much more expensive (staking set cost me $70) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a question, did you discover a problem which requires lowering the jewel? This is only a problem to correct endshake and interaction with other wheels must be considered as well.

If its just correcting a loose jewel thats fine but if not then I would sit back and re-assess.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, anilv said:

Just a question, did you discover a problem which requires lowering the jewel? This is only a problem to correct endshake and interaction with other wheels must be considered as well.

If its just correcting a loose jewel thats fine but if not then I would sit back and re-assess.

Anilv

Yes it is to correct endshake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I made an impulse buy, a K&D inverto. I read these are good tools so just purchased it. It arrived today and it looks like it was a bad idea (surprise surprise). 

The thread that at the top of the tool is completely bent. Is this going to cause me problems? I have 30 days to return it. I haven't had a chance to examine all of the other items yet... 

 

20191024_165200.jpg

15719331186413971414841012531961.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Looks so shiny and new AP. Are punches as new?  

 

They came in separate packaging, there's quite a few. I thought I'd leave them wrapped until I have some time to examine them. I literally opened the box and saw the bent stud and did a big sigh.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are considered a good staking set because you can get a jewelling lever attachment making them a jewelling tool as well, I assume that the bent screw is for part of the lever assembly for the jewelling tool but stand to be corrected as my own staking tool is a simpler item. 

For staking, as long as the plate is flat and can be centred and locked and the stake can be inserted and drop straight it should be good. If someone with a k&d can advise on the threaded bar you might be OK and then keep an eye out for a jewelling set. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, m1ks said:

These are considered a good staking set because you can get a jewelling lever attachment making them a jewelling tool as well, I assume that the bent screw is for part of the lever assembly for the jewelling tool but stand to be corrected as my own staking tool is a simpler item. 

For staking, as long as the plate is flat and can be centred and locked and the stake can be inserted and drop straight it should be good. If someone with a k&d can advise on the threaded bar you might be OK and then keep an eye out for a jewelling set. 

Thank you for your advice. I will wait for the opinion of others. It would be great if I could use it as a jewling tool as well. Hopefully It can be saved.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I place a plastic sheet on the jewel and press on it,  be it with steel punch or wooden.

Avoid hitting, just press. Any caution, not to damage the jewel.  

The jewel may jump out of it's  hole, reinsert from inside of  ebauche. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

I place a plastic sheet on the jewel and press on it,  be it with steel punch or wooden.

Avoid hitting, just press. Any caution, not to damage the jewel.  

The jewel may jump out of it's  hole, reinsert from inside of  ebauche. 

 

 

 

Which tool do you use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use the tube section of a bad crown to press on the outer rim of the jewel housing, pushing it a bit ( inward in ebauche) , next use a wooden stick pressing to push the housing outward of the ebauche( May take three  tries to get to acceptable move of the stone) Same approach for embeded jewels in bridges and mainplate.

Having done this to adjust end shake on nearly all arbors for so long, I have got good at it, will probably break jewels if I tried with dedicated tools.

Since you have already bought a staking set, I recommend using stakiing set, staying  with one tool, you,ll  master it sooner or later. 

I have planned to device a tool out of bracelete pin remover, for its micrometer action, lazy though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to the above, I believe this is the attachment that will fit your tool though reading Nucejoes comment it may be that you can manage without?
This is a US ebay link but you should be able to find similar if you're not in the US, it was the first quick search link I could find.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/K-D-Jeweling-Tool-Attachment-Watchmaking-Watchmakers-tool-Staking-sets/123885373754?hash=item1cd824c93a:g:eFgAAOSwMG1dYWs3

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
    • Aloha and thanks for catching all these small but important details, John.  I'm going to give it a shot. The good news is I have a parts movement here with a perfect complete balance.  I will place them side by side for visual reference when doing what you outlined.  It's been a while were I've had a hobby in which I joined a forum.  I forgot just how helpful everyone can be. Mahalo. Frank.
×
×
  • Create New...