Jump to content

NH35 from China


Recommended Posts

These are now readily available on the usual platforms, and even if at $25.57 the saving is not big compared to "official" SII suppliers, I wanted to check it out anyway. It arrived fairly quickly in a month. I'm posting large size pictures in case anyone wants to check on any finishing detail. Too bad I didn't got the cute Chinese day disk <_<

PA101012.thumb.JPG.0ae9c7665147e690e592e4b4b54f1401.JPG

PA101014.thumb.JPG.aebb90ba5460da825c0be98b815601e5.JPG

The first obvious question, is this a genuine item? My thinking is that somehow, it is. Even if Seiko claims that SII branded mov't are made in Japan, I would be very surprised if they weren't actually manufacturing in other Far East countries as well. The look and feel is the same as the other I've handled, however at this time I don't have another for a detailed comparison, neither the inclination to take take it dully apart to inspect lubrication and other small details. So I'm limiting this article to simple instrument verification. Below it's how it arrived. I have seen many brand new Seiko watches in similar show.

PA101004.thumb.JPG.1d8f775e5ee26ea7e0790fb6b6a3549f.JPG

After a bit of regulation at the Etachron pin I couldn't do better than this, respectively dial up and crown down. Again, that is not any different from specification and typical performances.

PA101007.thumb.JPG.56f7442adcb2c1276f81ef131ec720b8.JPG

PA101008.thumb.JPG.f578f0597f9c367f3374269185bfd4cf.JPG

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks surprisingly much the same as a 'genuine' one.

I wouldn't be at all surprised to discover they are in fact the same factories manufacturing Seiko's movements for them, (albeit with less rigorous qc perhaps?). Seiko's own movements carry immensely in regulation and I've had a few new with noticeable beat error, I'll bet that if you stripped cleaned and oiled that it would improve dramatically, maybe just try cleaning and re oiling the balance jewels to see what difference if any?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, clockboy said:

I am sure many of branded watch items are now produced in the far east. For $25.57 why bother to service just replace. 

The first victim of these prices could be Seiko itself. They sell watches with the above mov't costing easily $400 or even $800 when touted as "limited edition", which makes collectors drool. And they charge I guess around $150 to service in their official centers. Just replace the rotor with the Seiko branded one and you're done, there are no other differences.
I wonder however what's the business sense of selling so cheap a distinguished quality product, where's the profit?
Good for buyers and to popularize mechanical watches, but I doubt it can be good for the company.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AndyHull said:

What strikes me is that the suppliers are not shouting "Genuine Sekio" on their web pages, so perhaps these *are* clones.

They should not say Seiko. The maker name is SII (Seiko Instruments International), which just as the model number is kept different as they are intended for OEMs. And the SII logo on rotor is well visible in pictures

Quote

If so, they are remarkably good ones, but by the same token, so are some of the fake watches on the market these days. 
These two links do add weight to these being clones.

What I find remarkable is that they are able to retail and deliver a SS case and solid links bracelet for a little above $50. Their margin must be very, very small.
As I said the AliX price is not much higher than more established channels e.g. $36.80 http://www.startimesupply.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=NH35
One would get the "Chinese" price for a sized order directly from Hong Kong.

 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...