Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've (99%) completed the WRL level 2 course. My ST36 movement went back together smoothly until I tried to refit the upper balance jewel. I've now learned a lot about tiny parts flying away, and also how difficult it is to find those parts, and finally that they are generally unavailable to buy separately if you do lose them.

I put that movement into a bag and set it aside and decided to move onto another watch - a Slava 2428 I found on ebay in poor working condition. Again everything went smoothly, rewarding success and progress and confidence with help from ratfacegit videos on youtube, until I came again to the balance jewel and springs. Luckily, after googling after previous flying parts issues for tips, I began draping a clear piece of plastic film over my work and this worked really well to keep flying parts from flying too far. I was able to do a satisfying job of oiling the jewel and placing the capstone on the lower bearing cup. When it came to replacing the tri-legged spring in the Russian movement I sank at least 2 hours into trying to fit it in place with no success and found it incredibly frustrating. I'm paused again at this step. I do feel like I'm growing skills with this tweezer work, but I find frustration is hurting my motivation.

I have a lighted optivisor with a 3.5x power lens, with an optional 2.5x power loop I can slide in front of one eye. This feels like a minimal, possibly not enough, level of magnification when it comes to the balance jewel work. I invested in nice screwdrivers, swiss tweezers - I just can't seem to coordinate these springs.

1. When you work on servicing balance jewels is there a level of magnification that works best? Should I invest in a higher magnification eyeloop (10X?) just for that work?

2. In collective experience, is servicing the balance jewels a universal challenge for new watchmakers? Nothing else has really derailed me.

3. I've considered trying to service a few more near-junk watches without servicing the balance jewel disassembled, but doing a caveman job of cleaning and oiling it. Do you guys run into situations where you've made this decision and had success? I've seen a couple of videos where the watchmaker chooses not to service a shock jewel because the springs are irreplaceable and known to break. I definitely don't want anyone to endorse bad craftsmanship but wondering about situations where you've made compromises.

Overall, very much enjoying learning. Mark's videos have been a great structured start.

 

IMG_5793.HEIC

Posted

In cases of hard to replace jewels, I prefered this method over no clean option.

Remove balance complete, springs ..even regulating arm. Clean, even brush some parts.

Spread a large sheet of white material on the floor. On which I work on balance bridge.

Use bare hands and all it takes to instal the jewel assembly and springs back on, I do not worry about hand- parts contact at this stage.

Rinse. Oil through chaton hole, oil pivots as well.instal.

Meanwhile the balance complete is taking a bath in lighter fluid, shake the bottle very slowly.

You have cleaned all, the jewel, beneath the arms. Rinsed , got a chance to see a full view of hairspring coils, endcurve, etc.

I have no doubt you will find " not worrying about hand-parts contact, drastically eases working and improves your control over the task and enhances results.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Certain types of shock setting are difficult for all to handle.  The typical incabloc is not difficult as long as you DO NOT unseat the shock spring.  Then things can get sticky.  Kiff shock spring are a PITA unless you have the Kiff seating tool.  Your description sounds like a Kiff or some variant thereof.


Good luck and don't give up.  We all have our days.


RMD

Edited by rduckwor
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

@Sberry I've done a lot of Vostoks and I hope you'll find this post useful where you'll find a picture (among the assembly pictures) and a video (link) demonstrating how to get the anti-shock spring in place.

  • Like 2


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that Andy, Yes the new bracelet is worth more than the watch itself, Its one I have bought to service and clean-up and on-sell it as a project, look it may sell to someone who has a small wrist, I think I will buy an extender and may-be offer it up with a normal strap as well CJ
    • Not always that simple. Typically the only reason we would have any way of identifying a watch is if parts were available at any time and somebody had a parts reference book then they would help you to identify the watches that they have parts or. Unfortunately there are hundreds of thousands of watch movements with no identification and of course typically no parts the classic place were watches would be identified would be under the balance wheel and your pictures don't really show a good view of that. Occasionally I've seen watches marked under one of the plates. They felt very proud of their watch is a very prominent Swiss company and they ask he stamped the bottom of a plate so you have disassembled find it. Then there is the other system the keyless parts make up something called the fingerprint system but you still haven't given us enough information to make use of that. Here's an image showing what a fingerprint system looks like. The PDF is based on the physical book the physical book has sizes of watches these are smaller ladies watches and keyless parts which in the physical book are printed at the actual size of the watch parts. So to identify with the keyless we need in your case diameter measured on the dial side and a good picture of the keyless parts and then you have to hope that this was made within the right time span of the books that have this system on the other hand a lot of times on the dial side they will also put markings. So basically to identify a movement it has to come out of the case and has to be disassembled.
    • The strap is a 44Q6JB and hadn't realised how much they'd gone up in price. The used one I've got is very worn but may have other links floating around.
    • @Mercurial is this also a variation of the tool you posted? 
    • Thanks Andy, The bracelet is sized very small, around a 14cm wrist. Were would one try to source original links, I guess they wouldn't be cheap if found. The bracelet end links have 4406 B-E stamped on them, is this the Seiko Bracelet code ?? CJ  
×
×
  • Create New...