Jump to content

Setting Lever Screw Alteration


Recommended Posts

I hope you'll be patient with me, as I simply saw a solution and went at it, a bit hurriedly. 

I'm at the very beginning of this hobby, and after disassembling about 5 movements (orphaned movements, bought inexpensively on eBay), I've had success with reassembling only one and getting it to tick.  I disfigured the hairspring on one, and the other 3, lost  parts to the floor.

So on this FHF 96 ST movement, I disassembled with care, cleaned all parts with naptha and rinsed in isopropyl alcohol; only to find upon reassembly I lost another part.  Despite my best attempts and using the standard compartmentalized container with plastic bell cover--the setting lever screw had gone missing. 

I took a screw from a similar movement (I bought 10 orphaned movements from eBay a couple of months ago as "parts only") with the intent of taking apart and putting back together.

175426130_foundascrew.thumb.JPG.735f6293a49899b7fe030b1bba076c40.JPG

 

But the head was quite long, and the threaded portion not long enough.  As a result, the end sat flush with the main plate, and didn't reach the setting lever.

 

1679111825_soitsitsflush.thumb.JPG.640229668c9798f19ab17dce26778677.JPG

After confirmation it was the correct thread pitch and diameter for the setting lever, I placed it in a chuck with the intention of removing some shoulder from the screwhead's bottom, so it could sit proud enough to engage the setting lever. 

1402761467_screwfits.thumb.JPG.0c010ff51ff58fb109b876eb901eb38e.JPG

 

614161743_chuckedup.thumb.JPG.acd1a8656fb2585a3d6c5e4e8567b152.JPG

 

I used my lathe for the first time, and using a graver for the first time, I sloppily cut the screw.  You can see I unintentionally removed some threads close to the botom of the screwhead, but it wasn't a critical area, and there were enough threads to fully engage the setting lever. 

418043632_aftercut.thumb.JPG.778b629169510442dcb75acec73512dd.JPG

 

 

 

724315500_aftercutstillinchucknotproud.thumb.JPG.3db23998f527f2ae8fe2fa0e68a9d135.JPG

The screw now sat proud enough of the main plate, to work. 

1116754283_proudenough.thumb.JPG.cd73d0689b31c32d5fed9f4fe5067677.JPG

 

I have a lot of practice ahead.  I'm sure my work will improve.  This was my very first project, and although it's a bit lacking in quality, from a utilitarian point of view; it worked, and will get the watch ticking. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/28/2019 at 3:52 PM, SparkyLB said:

Despite my best attempts and using the standard compartmentalized container with plastic bell cover--the setting lever screw had gone missing.

One thing you can do to minimize risk of losing parts is to not wash screws when it's evident they are clean. Just drop them in the right compartment. I know that will horrify some people but it's not them that will find parts for you that got lost during unnecessary manipulation.
Beside that, good work with the lathe and all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for that information.  I certainly appreciate the constructive criticism and words of encouragement.  I don't clean screws or springs.  I have to get into the habit of tightening up my "chain of custody" practices.  I know how I dropped parts without knowing.  I previously performed the practice of putting things down, blindly.  That practice will now stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losing parts is standard practice when beginning, sure many will agree. I have never washed screws, but would if really bad. Worst is the pinging the part across the room! Want to get a lathe myself, hoping someone i know will get rid of his cheap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevew said:

Losing parts is standard practice when beginning, sure many will agree. I have never washed screws, but would if really bad. Worst is the pinging the part across the room! Want to get a lathe myself, hoping someone i know will get rid of his cheap. 

Yes, pinging parts is exasperating.  I remember Marc Lovick saying in a video  (and I paraphrase) "try to disassemble and reassemble a movement without using your fingers.  Use your tweezers as much as possible, and get used to the correct pressure involved with picking up and holding onto parts."  That's about where I am.  I'm developing the habit of picking up, and hovering for a moment or two before lifting to confirm I have a good purchase on the part.  I lost a crown wheel ring by picking it up from the outside, when it would have been more prudent to pick it up with the tweezers as close together as possible. 

I'm learning, and very much enjoying this.  I'm confident there will come a day when dropping and losing parts will be the exception, and not the rule.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most effective way to not loose parts is about your bench. You need it large, uncluttered, nice smooth light finish with raised edges and you have to sit do that it's at shoulder lever. The plus is having inclined arm rests. And work far from the edge for as much is possible. 

You must have at least some of the above. That will make you be comfortable and relaxed, physically and mentally. When something slips it won't go far and you will see it right away. 

You need to prevent pinging at any cost. First, identify the parts which will ping and how they will. Don't remove anything under which holds a potentially pinging part before having studied what comes next with diagrams or videos. Always work with a stick or Rodico in the left hand. Of course the safest way is to work in a bag. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Modular Movement Holder.pdf  
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
    • Good job, that band matches the watch perfectly.
×
×
  • Create New...