Jump to content

Bulova Precisionist Wilton


rustycolt

Recommended Posts

Decided today to celebrate the completion of my recent vintage Bulova project by wearing one of my favourite watches. It's one of the moderns that make up the majority of my current collection. The level of detail and finishing that Bulova put into these impresses me to no end. No, it does not possess a mechanical movement, but there are three standout features that make it unlike anything I've seen before, and give it the soul that is rare in watches powered by electrical current.

 

-The motion of the second hand sweep is flawlessly smooth. More than a few times I've been entranced while watching the seconds sweep by on this watch. It's not just the motion either, the relationship of the second hand with the other hands, dial, and indicators is mesmerizing at a level which cannot be photographed by my smartphone. The rose gold coloured markers that I opted for are intensely alive with reflections and shadows. 

 

-The accuracy is advertised at +/-10s /year. Mine has operated well within that tolerance. The new tuning fork design allows a frequency of 262.144kHz! 

 

-The chronograph measures to 1/1000 of a second. THOUSANDTHS! While I admit that it is difficult to produce a valid example of practical justification for this feature, I offer in parallel that practicality can occasionally get stuffed. 

 

96B12 as photographed.

 

post-456-0-03959200-1419350843_thumb.jpg

post-456-0-88919900-1419350787_thumb.jpg

post-456-0-65267600-1419350907_thumb.jpg

 

If you haven't seen these before, visit bulovaprecisionist.com for a full rundown and interactive demo - you can control the 1/1000 chrono, and view the other features of the Precisionist line. They did a great job of that as well, very true to the real thing!

 

This is not a watch for lume nuts - there isn't any at all, then again, what the heck are you going to time to the 1/1000 in the dark???

At 46mm (+crown), it's one of the largest watches i own. My preferred size is in the 38-42 range, and while I do notice the additional wrist space this takes up, it is certainly still pleasant to wear, and does not feel oversized or garish at all. Honestly, the larger size gives it a presence that it rightly deserves, and how can you expect such small measurements from the registers to be accurate if they are too tiny to read?

 

I feel a bit of a sinner posting a modern piece which I cannot even claim to have restored, serviced, or otherwise influenced. I did want to share this with you, dear friends as it truly is the pretty young girl who is also intelligent, witty, and humble. Reason enough for me to reconsider my own subconscious generalizations of the quartz generation, and something I thought that some of you may appreciate as well.

 

-Jeremy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is one beautiful watch Jeremy.

I wouldn't give a toss what engine is inside when something looks as good as that and does what it says on the tin. Most folk on here know my passion is for mechanical chronographs, but my second favourite, up there with my Speedmaster, is a Seiko Quartz Chronograph. I'll post it on here sometime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
    • Hi all, total newbie to watchmaking and I've had a bit of a mishap. Just completing level 2 and was doing ok, but I was just on the last part of the reassembly of my ST3620 when the balance end stone shot across the room, just as I was trying to see if I had put the correct amount of oil between it and the balance end, aarrrgh! Been on my hands and knees combing the carpet for 20mins looking for it but to no avail. Does anybody know where I can get a replacement from and what to look for please?? Thanks.
    • Get someone local to tig it ,very easy fix and should only take a few minutes so probably wouldn’t cost much ,or failing that get it very clean and silver solder it. Dell
    • Hi, The winding pin is not split, well that's how it was when I obtained the watch. The movement is front-loaded and here's a picture of where the case screws are fitted. The face picture is before I dismantled it. Quick update.  I've always had a nylon ring sitting in the parts try that I wasn't sure where it went and left it to the last thing as I know it must be part of the case assembly. Anyway, looking at the picture in my last post you can see, just under the winding stem, a white-looking object, this is the nylon ring 🤭 So, I had to remove the dial again and replace the ring. Once this was all back together I placed the movement in the case and realized my initial problem maybe is not a problem as it looks like I can screw the movement back in the case and then place the hands as the dial is nearly flush with the outside of the case anyway so I'll be able to check for alignment. if all is good then just fit the crystal and bezel 🤔 I can't think of any issues with this approach but please comment if you think I've not thought of something. Another lesson learned as well. Take more pictures not just of the movement parts and location 😅
×
×
  • Create New...