Jump to content

ETA cal. 2472 problems with setting lever and screw


VWatchie

Recommended Posts

y4mYox8dPMlMxnYQ3nFiz4mcjYCoWv5v3qPvElap


I’m having serious problems removing and replacing the stem on this ETA 2472 that I’m servicing.

The only way I can remove the stem is by unscrewing the setting lever screw completely. Of course, this makes it impossible to replace the stem. I’ve been trying to unscrew in extremely small steps while trying to remove the stem by gently, and sometimes forcefully,  shaking/moving the stem in all horizontal directions while pulling it out, but it just won’t come loose. That is until the screw detaches from the setting lever.

I’ve also tried to first reattach the screw to the setting lever and then later put the stem back in, but this fails too. In this case, the setting lever is just hanging on to the last half thread of the screw but when putting the stem back in it probably moves the screw a bit and the setting lever comes loose again.

It’s an understatement to say that this has been extremely patience-testing. Having removed large parts of the date complication for the fourth time to reach the keyless works, I felt 100 % stuck.
I wonder, is this a design flaw, are my parts somehow broken or faulty, and more than anything, what could be a solution?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rogart63 said:

Think i have some 2472 parts . Can have a look . Maybe the threads ar worn in the setting lever. They look a little short? 

Thanks, and yes, that could very well be the problem! The design definitely seems to leave no room for imperfections! However, I'm happy to say that I just came up with a solution. I'm not a technical guy so I really, truly surprised myself (än är inte undrens tid förbi :rolleyes:). I realized that the case was big enough to insert the movement into the case with the stem attached to the movement, crown unscrewed of course, and then hold the stem with pliers inside the case while screwing back the crown from the outside of the case.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good approach. 

I have made a habbit of checking set mech with just the mainplate and stem, fixing faults, rinse and start assembly with stem attached.  I feel more direct control over/ much improved stem installation and results.

Good percentage of postings for help are about stem issues, most of which will surprisingly be eliminated if we start assembly with " stem issues solved" approach.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Nucejoe! I usually do the keyless works pretty late in my assembly process (train wheels, barrel, bridges, motion work, keyless work, date complication if any, and finally escapement and balance). However, reading ETAs tech sheets it would seem they usually start the assembly process with the keyless works (at least for the 2824-2). Maybe there's a good reason for it!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2019 at 10:21 PM, watchweasol said:

Hi Watchie  As above I usually start with the keyless work and work my way back to the balance. I think it all depends on the construction of the timepiece and your own preference.  

If possible I try to follow the assembly process as taught at watchrepairlessons.com (Level 2: Maintenance servicing). I.e., I assemble the keyless works just before the pallets and balance. I never really thought about why this is a "recommended practice" in the course. At first I thought it might have something to do with facilitating testing the free running of the train wheels, but this isn't a problem as long as we haven't installed the crown wheel and the click works on the barrel bridge I suppose. Another reason could be that the barrel bridge usually supports the clutch and winding pinion while assembling those parts. Well, I've strayed at bit from the topic of this thread, but nevertheless, why would it be a good or bad idea to begin with the keyless works?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, I have finally found the "true source of the problem", and I feel equally elated :) and embarrassed :(

The problem is that I replaced the setting lever screw after I replaced the barrel bridge, when in fact the setting lever screw must be replaced before the barrel bridge. Doing it in the wrong order "works" but it will make the oscillating weight slightly foul the head of the screw and it will make it impossible to remove the stem without the setting lever detaching from the setting lever screw.

This mistake I won't be doing again!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
×
×
  • Create New...