Jump to content

Amplitude drops or watch stops with crown screwed down


AP1875

Recommended Posts

I serviced a Chinese movement, has good results on the timegrapher. 

Installed it in the watch case and when I screw the crown down the amplitude drops off dramatically to 170-200. 

I assume this is due to the stem? However I'm not sure how the stem can affect amplitude and cause the watch to stop? 

Time grapher results without crown screwed down. 20190917_224559.thumb.jpg.5795cd5ad9aff1c1214b71b7ec607ac2.jpg20190917_224644.thumb.jpg.cc2f8dc80d4434157503212c10911076.jpg20190917_224620.thumb.jpg.7d9ad2354b3a2a91cc0efb363d23e936.jpg

 

Edited by AP1875
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could it simply be pushing the movement against the movement ring, and thus fouling the balance, or some other part?

Alternatively it may cause the movement, or one of the hands to press hard against the face, or push the movement up so that the second hand touches the crystal.

A few pictures might help us decide on the cause.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Could it simply be pushing the movement against the movement ring, and thus fouling the balance, or some other part?

Alternatively it may cause the movement, or one of the hands to press hard against the face, or push the movement up so that the second hand touches the crystal.

A few pictures might help us decide on the cause.

Thanks for your reply, 

There's no movement ring, so that's ruled out. 

I can remove the glass and see if it has the same problem ruling the hands out but the movement is held by clamps so I don't think it's anything I can see. Which is why I wanted to question the stem causing the issue inside the movement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that the quality control of some of these Chinese movements is marginal at best, and woeful at worst, it may well be the case that pressure against the stem is causing it to jam somehow. Exactly how is the question. The stem itself may be too long, or machined out of spec., or the tolerances of the case or the screw in crown may be wrong, or the stem may be too short, and screwing it in, may cause it to pull out slightly, jamming up the keyless work.

If you manually push the stem in with the movement uncased, do you get the same effect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I removed the movement again and reinstalled it. I ran it without the case clamps tightened down that was fine so tightened them slightly. Seems fine upto now. 

So it must've been something inside the keyless/stem? 

How does a keyless/stem affect amplitude? I can't visualise what's happening inside the movement. 

I'm not familiar with the term castle wheel, are you referring to the winding or sliding pinion? 

49 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  I think Andy is on right track regarding tolerences, When assembled and tested the movements would not be cased so a problem of this nature wouldn't show up untill cased,    My guess would be an over length stem pressing on the castle wheel and interfering with the movement .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Castle wheel" is probably another term for the sliding pinion since it looks like a little castle turret.

 

 slidingpinion.jpg

 

If the case alignment with a screw-down crown isn't perfect between the stem and the movement, the stem can act like a spring when the crown is tightened and exert a force on the movement in an up or down direction. If that makes any part of the movement touch a part it's not supposed to (fouling), it can have a tremendous effect on the performance, including amplitude.  

 

You may never be able to find out exactly what's touching what because as soon as you release the stem, the pressure goes away. You might be able to put it all together and let it run for a month or so and then take the movement apart and look for wear marks on the pieces, but I wouldn't recommend that. It's better just to use a spacer to make sure the the case, dial, movment and stem are all in alignment.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, eccentric59 said:

You may never be able to find out exactly what's touching what because as soon as you release the stem, the pressure goes away.

With ingenuity you could be able to. Plastigauge was invented for that. Now, I've never heard of it being uses on watches, but one could use aluminium foil stacked in different places to find where and how much shimming is needed.
Philippe Dufour once saidn that case makers "are not very precise people", maybe the OP found himself in the same predicament :)

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, AP1875 said:

The watch seems fine now. Just so I know for the future if it was the length of the stem what is the most practical way of shortening it? 

I'm also interested in knowing how to cut a stem, because I have a project that will involve to adjust the length of the new stem I bought. I think the final fine tune is done with a small grain file, but I don't know what tool to use for the first "big" cuts (I'll have to buy that tool, I don't think I have anything for that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also interested in knowing how to cut a stem, because I have a project that will involve to adjust the length of the new stem I bought. I think the final fine tune is done with a small grain file, but I don't know what tool to use for the first "big" cuts (I'll have to buy that tool, I don't think I have anything for that).

Any hand held wrench cutter will do. The file the end to a dome.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

shortening a stem is not rocket science but needs great care not to over do it. 

Stem cut a bit too short? No problem, drop a minuscule piece of wire in the crown, apply locking agent and screw down well. Shhh don't tell anyone! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jdm said:

Stem cut a bit too short? No problem, drop a minuscule piece of wire in the crown, apply locking agent and screw down well. Shhh don't tell anyone! 

You will get away with about two thread turns of missing depth that way (allegedly.. not that I would know of course) any more than that and you might have to resort to a stem extender or a new stem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

You will get away with about two thread turns of missing depth that way (allegedly.. not that I would know of course) any more than that and you might have to resort to a stem extender or a new stem.

That's why a wrote "a bit". Anyway, a 1.0mm stem can have a 0.2 or 0.25 pitch, which means a crown tapped 3mm deep takes like 15 or 20 turns to full screw. One can have undercut 2mm and still have enough threads to hold safe.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why a wrote "a bit". Anyway, a 1.0mm stem can have a 0.2 or 0.25 pitch, which means a crown tapped 3mm deep takes like 15 or 20 turns to full screw. One can have undercut 2mm and still have enough threads to hold safe.

Too much math. I would just make another stem on a lathe

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the Peseux 7040 is doing very well as far as the rate (and amplitude) is concerned. The maximum delta measured was 20 seconds between fully wound, crown down (+8 s/d) and fully wound minus 24 hours, crown up (-12 s/d). Compare that to the ETA 2763 having a delta of over 80 seconds. What I was trying to convey was that I observed that the much higher amplitude of the Peseux movement during a 12-minute measuring period could momentarily fluctuate by 30° just like the much lower amplitude on the ETA 2763. I haven't studied the History graph on @praezis PCTM software for any other than these two movements but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that these fluctuations in amplitude during a 12-minute measuring period are the rule rather than the exception for all typical non-high-end-chronometer movements.
    • I'm presently using a cheap supermarket ultrasonic cleaner, with L&R #111 cleaner and #3 rinse solutions. I cut a bit off the bottom of an appropriate size plastic sports drink bottle, which is a perfect fit around the mesh basket I use (~65mm diameter). That allows me to use mostly water in the machine tub and cleaner or rinse only in the small plastic container. I keep the solutions that are still fit for use in small glass jam jars. I use the cleaner then two rinses, then the mesh basket balances on my bathroom radiator (once it stops dripping) to dry the parts with moderate warmth. Prior to that I tried just lighter fluid (eg. generic zippo fluid) and just soaking / swirling parts in the glass jars, but the movements did not run at all well afterwards, they were still acting gummed up. The proper solutions make a world of difference & the watches now work as they should!    
    • Have to agree with you. Will not do another. Did not enjoy the time spent. However, it was worth it to know that I understood how to disassemble, look for defects, repair and then assemble. Timegrapher? No facility to alter anything other than the stud. Everything is metal to metal.
    • Couple of things H. There surely seems to be a reoccurring fluctuation pattern  of somewhere around every 5 minutes. More noticable with your crown left trace having a large peak gradually reducing to 2 small peaks and troughs then back up to another large peak. Nev posted a download link to a book by Harold Kelly not so long back that i started to read while i was away. There was a good section on wheel and pinion ratios, rotation periods of wheels of different beat frequencies that's worth a read. Then something that bugs me comparing the amplitude and timing rate changes with your dial up trace which i chose to avoid wheel imbalances . The amplitude fluctuates by an extreme of 30 ° and the rate fluctuates by an extreme of 21 seconds as per your reading. In normal circumstances a movement dropping its power over the course of the mainspring unwinding, a hairspring acting isochronical will maintain its rate almost to the end of the power reserve. Similarly power wound into a movement increasing its amplitude from 265° to 295° a hairspring again acting isochronical will again maintain its rate aside from a brief few moments until it settles into it's rate. From that it seems to me that because the amplitude difference isn't big enough to affect a rate change then the amplitude fluctuation cause is not coming from anywhere but from the balance. So its whatever is causing the rate to change increase and decrease within the balance is also slowing and speeding up the hairspring swings. I'm not quite sure if I've just gone around in circles with that, it made sense to me when i started  😅 We did have a discussion a while back when i asked if rate could come from that point as well as from the regulator pins. This area can be electro stiffened in high grade hs i remember was the answer. I remember that over Ross's issue with balance endshake.
    • somewhere in the universe although as I'm answering this I remembered which discussion group. Somebody had a similar question loss basically expanded it to the watch would totally disintegrate in my think like 30 years. I'd have to go back and find the original discussion if I can the person seem to think that they hairspring would disintegrate like you describe and just metal on metal wearing out the entire watch. Except of course we all work on watches over 30 years and they obviously do not disintegrate. Plus somebody came along and explained why hairsprings do not have the same issues as mainsprings. Although hairsprings do end up with watchmakers insisting on bending and playing with them and torturing them etc. and that obviously is not good for the metal at all. one of the problems that you're having here it is what is the purpose of the test that started this discussion? Let me go and snip out the original image as you can see from images above this watch is horrible. Or is it? What is the purpose of the images up above in other words what exactly would use this test for? The real purpose this test is show the effect of amplitude on timekeeping. Or specifically you're looking for mechanical issues that are causing fluctuations in amplitude which unfortunately shows up  with timekeeping. or basically everything affects timekeeping but amplitude is affected by the mechanical characteristics of the watch from the mainspring to the balance wheel and unfortunately as it's a mechanical watch your always going to have power fluctuations. so how do we rule out unacceptable fluctuations versus the natural characteristic of the watch? Usually if you can find a repeating pattern you can narrow it down to the offending components for instance I'm attaching a PDF. on the second page of the PDF it talks about 21st-century equipment versus paper tape timing machines. Then they give an example of timing problems solely caused by a faulty component. although off you have a user's manual for a paper tape machine it does explain that you can find faulty components by looking at the variations on your paper tape seeing how often they repeat and do the same thing without the fancy software. Even though it was claimed that you couldn't do that in other words you couldn't find a pattern? One of the problems that comes up with modern LCD-based timing machines versus software is limited screen size. In other words it makes it very hard to look for patterns you'll see variations in numbers but it's hard to tell what's going on which is why the display above is really nice to see if there is a problem. for instance here's a paper printout from a witschi timing machine it does look distorted because I changed the speed at which the image would move across the screen. In other words I was trying to figure out a way to extend the screen to being much longer as I was looking for a pattern as you can see there doesn't appear to be a pattern at all so basically we end up with a watch that I cannot time at all they cannot really figure out what the problem is and I actually cannot find a pattern even begin the figure out where the problem might be. Plus I agreed to service this watch for free as I was going to use it for the purposes of a lecture. In other words it's a nice railroad grade pocket watch and I wanted to show before how horrible amplitude is and how wonderful it looks after serviced and after servicing it looked exactly the same still horrible. Then I used software for a clock timing machine and came up with this interesting image one a minor problems we have with time plots and  how they look is that they all do things a little bit differently. So this was occurring approximately every five minutes. Then we need another chart then I replaced something in the watch and we now get this one of the things that I was always bothered with was if I had put the hands on after servicing would the watch have Time? Because the pattern was repeating the watch would average that out may  it would have Time. Oh and what did I change somebody had swapped the mainspring barrel for something different were getting a binding between the mainspring in the center wheel pinion. so the problem you're having is what exactly is the problem? the purpose of the test image is to look for mechanical problems causing amplitude problems. Because it's a mechanical watch your always going to have variations so are the variations in this watch abnormal or normal for this watch? Once we eliminate the mechanical issues beyond it's a mechanical watch then you can work on timing issues. for timing issues I recommend going back to the normal display that were used to and make sure you have your averaging times set correctly. In other words while the graphical display is basically real time years of the numbers are averaged over time. Anywhere from 20 to 40 seconds depending upon whose specs you're looking at. So basically they will average out the problems were seeing on this time plot.   one of my amusements with students that go to the same school is that you have different instructors. So this gives you different experiences like what exactly is tight anyway as I don't remember any thing like this? Then did you know that Rolex at least in Geneva as I visited their service center replace all the screws in the watch every time they service the watch. then why did they do that because they use power screwdrivers and tighten those things down as tight as you can get them which has a problem. How many times can you tighten screw down really tight before the hints break off. So they replace the screws every single time. So personally I don't think they have to be so tight that you're in danger snapping head off that's too tight in my opinion. but the screws definitely shouldn't be falling out either which I've occasionally see and where people just don't tighten their screws tight enough.   Horologica Times -- May 2004 From the Workshop witschi time plot.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...