Jump to content

Dessicant in watertight bag?


Recommended Posts

Unless called for by design requirements, the package obsorbs and retains moisture from the air,  not water in its liquid form.

 Water molecules in gaseous/ moisture state do penetrate the envelope, water in its liquid form dosn,t. 

Desicatants may include natural or synthetic in multiple layers to satisfy the requirements. So much depends on what  you got this package out of.

Regards joe

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Unless called for by design requirements, the package obsorbs and retains moisture from the air,  not water in its liquid form.

 Water molecules in gaseous/ moisture state do penetrate the envelope, water in its liquid form dosn,t. 

Desicatants may include natural or synthetic in multiple layers to satisfy the requirements. So much depends on what  you got this package out of.

Regards joe

 

Agreed. Also the "plastic"may in fact be a plasticised film with micro perforations, or may even be something as simple as paper coated with carnuba wax or similar (think Smarities or M&Ms), so it may be very hydroscopic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with all that but the point that I'm trying to make here is that this bag, used in a vitamins bottle, is clearly made of common packaging plastic, not microperforated paper or cloth as commonly see. It's thick and shiny on both sides, leaves no residue when scratched. It is actually stronger than the one I used for single serving sauces, as it cannot be ripped by hand.

How it can be permeable to air and moisture is a mistery to me. 

DSC_0063.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to be a common property of polymers. Here's a description of the mechanism:

https://polymerdatabase.com/polymer physics/Permeability.html

So that plastic bag may be permeable to water vapour, and to a lesser extent to liquid water. An important function of the bag is to stop the solid desiccant mixing with your vitamins. Maybe the reason it's so resistant to tearing is because the pellets are harmful if swallowed.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. It is amazing to see artificial materials engineered for properties that aren't even apparent. Unless the factory (in Thailand as observers may have noticed) isn't silently cheating everybody, LOL.

Another example is in my new diving snorkel. A (polymer?) membrane under the mouth piece lets water leave, one way. Black magic to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

It seems to be a common property of polymers. Here's a description of the mechanism:

https://polymerdatabase.com/polymer physics/Permeability.html

So that plastic bag may be permeable to water vapour, and to a lesser extent to liquid water. An important function of the bag is to stop the solid desiccant mixing with your vitamins. Maybe the reason it's so resistant to tearing is because the pellets are harmful if swallowed.

Nature produces abundance of edible desiccants for us, No need to consider harmful stuff. Desiccation is not limited to water moisture, however, thence some desiccant may become harmful by contaminants.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
    • Kind of guessing here watchie with a bit of logic.
    • Canon with FE 4612a movement. Day and Date display Trying something new. Although is will take some time for me to start, I have a back injury that is very painful and so cannot concentrate. Set myself a target to begin mid May. Purchased a Canon wrist watch with  FE 4612a movement. Advertised with Rotor missing. Arrived, took photographs. Strap broken, removed and place in bin. Back removed. No rotor. Wind is stiff. Can wind up. Everything moves ok. Oscillates for under a minute, then stops. No rotor but all wheels appear the be there. Have sent for a donor movement FE4612. No day wheel.  I have taken basic photographs up to the point of service commencement. I will try a new format and use the record system on the microscope to show the full disassembly subsequent assembly. I will photograph the cleaning process.  Whilst I have no intention beginning a YouTube channel, I would like to begin to make a better record of my work standard. Work to do.  Make case to a better standard. Repair crystal. Replace strap.  Only a thought. I will try to insert an English day wheel. Not sure if it can be done, but hey, what can I lose. Got to stop now, back so sore.
×
×
  • Create New...