Jump to content

Brac Cal 107 balance jewel.


AndyHull

Recommended Posts

I picked up a Brac Cal 107 "Tropicalized" watch a while back, with what appeared to simply be a broken balance top pivot. I removed the balance and examined the pivots and sure enough the top one was missing.

However I purchased what I assumed was the correct part namely a "Balance Wheel Assembly BRAC Cal. 107 (10.5''') Part #705 (TC125)" - and attempted to fit it.

This was a little more fiddly than fitting a "balance complete", but since I couldn't source one of those, I pulled the trigger on the balance assembly, and fitted it to the existing balance cock without too much swearing.

However it appears to my untrained eye that there is a second issue, namely that the lower jewel is too low. The balance therefore doesn't sit correctly. I imagine this may have been pushed down by the same impact that broke the top pivot (and made the interesting impact mark in the bottom plate, which you can see in the picture.

So the questions (based on this admittedly pretty poor picture) are.

A) Is my diagnosis likely to be correct?

B ) How to I remedy this ?

 

RIMG0281.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JBerry said:

Do you have a jeweling tool to adjust the height of the jewel? I would think it should be flush with the mainplate

I don't have a jeweling tool, unfortunately, but... I suspect that might be next on my list of things to buy.

The jewel certainly looks to be well below the level of the main plate, but I wasn't sure if that was normal for this type of movement, and my new balance staff was too short, or if my hunch was correct and the jewel had shifted.

I guess I should strip the thing down, or at least pop off the dial and hands,  and examine it from the other side, but that may not prove conclusive.

Better still I should compare with another Brac 107, but since they seem to be fairly uncommon, that is easier said than done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, yankeedog said:

I have read enough of your posts to think you have made a well reasoned call.I would try pressing it back through from the opposite side with a little oil and the flat of a screw driver.flush as previously mentioned.

I guess I have little to loose, since the watch wasn't expensive, but I like the look of the thing, so I didn't want to dive in and break the jewel.


Perhaps a little gentle pressure, and go easy with the sledge hammer, and we should be good to go.

I've put it back in the to-do pile, so when it reaches the top again I'll give it a go. I guess the worst that can happen is I have to source some jewels and learn how to do it properly. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, yankeedog said:

All these movements work in similar ways..I don't think they reinvented the wheel when they built this one.it doesn't makes sense for the jewel to be recessed.you would have metal on metal friction.don't you think?

Actually you make a good point there. I think you have convinced me. I'll give it a whirl. I promise not to use too many sweary words when I inevitably break something important. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stripdown to mainplate and cock to push the jewel back in by a wooden stick and  adjust for the proper position of balance staff, all as the proceedure to fit in a new balance staff or readjustment of a worn pivot.

Pin pallet offers a wide range for fork and escape interface, whilst jeweled pallets don,t, therefore jewels should be routinely adjusted for proper interfaces.

I beleive I have brac 107 parts, will check and infrom you, be happy to send all parts you may come to need. 

The new wheel and old hairspring are to be vibrated together.

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AndyHull said:

Actually you make a good point there. I think you have convinced me. I'll give it a whirl. I promise not to use too many sweary words when I inevitably break something important. :P

At a young age my father explained that swear words were actually incantations passed down to us from the druids ,they were only outlawed by the church because they worked. I suggest waiting until the full moon to adjust the stone.Or out of an abundance of caution until the autumnal equinox.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Found brac107,  drop me your address with the list of parts you need.

Best wishes

Thanks, I will do.
I may not need anything, apart from confirmation that the jewel should be flush with the main plate, but I suspect it should.
Other than that, I think I have everything, although I can't obviously be certain till I tear it down and fix it.
That may not happen for a few days, as the weekend looks pretty busy at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Thanks, I will do.
I may not need anything, apart from confirmation that the jewel should be flush with the main plate, but I suspect it should.
Other than that, I think I have everything, although I can't obviously be certain till I tear it down and fix it.
That may not happen for a few days, as the weekend looks pretty busy at the moment.

It dosn,t have to be perfectly flush, actually it sits a bit in, 5% mm, the determining factor is to get a functioning  impulse pin/ fork horn interface and balance wheel not rubbing on parts which it is not suppose to.

I have enough brac parts to be your material house for life.  :lol:   No problem attt all.

Regards 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
    • Aloha and thanks for catching all these small but important details, John.  I'm going to give it a shot. The good news is I have a parts movement here with a perfect complete balance.  I will place them side by side for visual reference when doing what you outlined.  It's been a while were I've had a hobby in which I joined a forum.  I forgot just how helpful everyone can be. Mahalo. Frank.
×
×
  • Create New...