Jump to content

servicing my new lathe?


PeteFr2

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Just taken delivery of a G Boley Geneva 8mm watch lathe with a comprehensive set of tools and a reversible motor (multifix). I am familiar with lathes, my background is in engineering but obviously larger gap bed lathes.

Before I start using it I'd like to service it, in particular the headstock bearings. There seems to be no play in the headstock so I assume the bearings will be ok, however I'd still like to clean them out and lubricate them before I use the lathe. I've never done this so I'm not sure how to strip it or what lubricant to use, are there any pitfalls I should consider?

Any help or advice much appreciated.

Thanks,  Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A pic or two would help, but generally there is a nut at the rear of the spindle that needs to come off, these can be split and hold on by friction, or have a set screw. This is the adjusting nut. The pulley will be held by at least one screw, sometimes 2 or more (usually 1). The rear bearing is keyed and is a sliding fit, very very close, on the spindle. With everything loose, use a brass drift and knock the spindle out the front.

For oil I use ISO 22 but any light oil is OK. It's a constant-loss design, you need to oil it every time you use it. Your white shirts will have a nice oil stripe in line with the front bearing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two books also work getting is Donald de Carles book Watchmakers and Model Engineers lathe which is easy to come by and not that expensive.

Then there is Archie B Perkins book 'The Modern Watchamkers Lathe and How to Use it'

Archie's book is expensive and not so easy to get but is very much worth it and has a whole chapter just on stripping down cleaning and oiling the headstock. It even goes into regrinding the cone bearings which I think is a step beyond what most of us can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks to everyone who replied re my uncertainty in servicing the headstock bearings on my Boley lathe. I have now successfully finished the service and will (attempt to) post a photo below of the disassembled components and description of the process, hopefully to help anyone else who is considering doing this for the first time as I was.

Process was as follows:

Remove the 2 dust caps (one either end), these are simple split ring unthreaded knurled dust caps. They have a semi-circular cut out in the inner face which by turning them on the sleeve reveals an oil hole drilled in the stub of the headstock to lubricate the bearings. I found it easier to loosen them by pushing a blade in the split.

Next remove the back nut, again a split knurled nut which releases easier if expanded slightly with a blade in the split and unscrewed anticlockwise (right hand thread).

Next I preferred to remove the grub screw in the pulley. Then the spindle can be tapped out from the rear using some form of protection on the end, I used a piece of hardwood. This wasn't difficult. The front inner race stayed on the spindle, the rear inner race was removed as the spindle was persuaded forwards, don't forget to support the pulley. My model has plain taper bearings. After a thorough cleaning and inspection I lubricated the inner races with a few drops of quality clock oil and reassembled. I then adjusted the end float with the back nut until I estimated approx. 0.01mm end float as I have always understood that taper bearings require some end float to allow for expansion when running. After checking there seems to be no perceivable side shake or run out and the spindle is now a pleasure to turn. 

I hope this helps someone and I would welcome any comments from the more experienced on my amount of end float.

Can I ask someone to study the photos and tell me why my German Boley has an English component fitted in the pedestal, did Boley source certain components from other manufacturers or have I bought a 'bitsa' lathe? It is the only component with the kit which is not Boley.

Thanks, Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

PeteFr2,

When I reassemble the spindle assembly I smack the nose cone with a wooden 2x4 to help seat the spindle into the cone bearings. To adjust it I tighten the nut on the back while slowly rotating the spindle by hand until it feels tight. Then I back off the nut about 1/4 of a turn. This is something that has to be done by feel.  The spindle needs a microscopic gap to allow it to ride on the lubricating oil   The  lubricating oil should be the actual bearing. The ideal gap would be the distance of one molecule of oil but the practical distance will have to be slightly larger. I then run the lathe for a short period and check for any heat buildup in the headstock. If it becomes warm it is too tight and the nut needs to be slightly backed off. The last thing I do is check the inside cone runout with a 1/10,000 inch dial indicator. The runout should be around 2/10,000 of an inch. Do not try to go past that or you can damage the lathe. This issue with cone bearings was a limiting factor in precision for hundreds of years. Around the WW2 era Derbyshire finally improved on it when they began producing lathes with ultra precision ball bearings. They were able to achieve a spindle runout of around 50/1,000,000 of an inch. Both Derbyshire and Levin lathes have  reduced spindle runout as far as ball bearing spindles will allow. The only way to surpass this is with air bearings or hydrostatic bearings.

david

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks everyone. Sorry haven't replied sooner I haven't checked the forum recently as I got side tracked reorganising and sorting out my workshop area, just about to make a couple of new work benches to replace the old kitchen table I was using and then I can set the lathe up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
×
×
  • Create New...