Jump to content

Reforming a hairspring curve - Breguet Overcurve HS


Recommended Posts

Save your money, the tweezers in the hswalsh link is of little use. OH did a very good job finding this tool, but it is the smallest of the set, too small for gents- or pocketwatches. I suppose it is the remains of a long sold stock.

My old Bergeon catalog shows them, but they were no more available when the catalog was issued.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Save your money, the tweezers in the hswalsh link is of little use. OH did a very good job finding this tool, but it is the smallest of the set, too small for gents- or pocketwatches. I suppose it is the remains of a long sold stock.
My old Bergeon catalog shows them, but they were no more available when the catalog was issued.
Frank
Yes, I don't think they've been made for some time and any offered as new were/are remains of old stock.

There was a time even in the 70s as mechanical watches were heading toward supposed extinction that women churned out piecework of vibrated springs matched to balances from home. They'd have a Greiner Spiromatic and some killer tweezers and do this stuff at a speed and precision that's unbelievable. I'm almost sure the lady I met at Parmigiani from the post above was one of these workers, pulled in from semiretirement.

There's no demand for such tools now and there's enough on the used market to satisfy the collectors and occasional users. My set has been updated numerous times in the last 20 years as I found better examples to replace the ones I had, selling off the lesser pieces. Being in Switzerland we're a bit spoiled as you stumble upon this stuff at random flea markets. I found a selection of screw slotting files a few months back, really fine ones they don't make anymore, for two bucks a piece, new old stock.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, here are the bad boys. The curving ones I have go from 00 to 5, the lifting ones from 00 to 4. The example hairspring would be about right for a deck watch- very big, and the largest of both sets worked well. You can see in the 4th pic that the end of the lifting tweezers can be adjusted for the thickness of the spring (red circle) and how far it pushes (screw in blue circle). I just did a simple overcoil, there are many shapes, here the goal was to get the curve to follow one of the spirals more or less imagining in our imaginary watch that would be where the regulator lies.

IMG_0019 (Large).JPG

IMG_0020 (Large).JPG

IMG_0021 (Large).JPG

IMG_0023 (Large).JPG

IMG_0024 (Large).JPG

IMG_0025 (Large).JPG

IMG_0026 (Large).JPG

IMG_0027 (Large).JPG

IMG_0028 (Large).JPG

IMG_0029 (Large).JPG

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2019 at 8:58 AM, nickelsilver said:

Those are for raising the overcoil, the curved ones for forming its curve. There are about 8 different sizes of each.

 

33 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Here is a link for the Breguet Hairspring Tweezers, Dumont
https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/breguet-hairspring-tweezers-dumont

Worth to remind once again that as Master nickelsilver nicely explained, the 00 size available from  Cousins UK, is the smallest of all were once available, and is good for the tiniest hairspring only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
On 8/18/2019 at 11:36 AM, praezis said:

Hi,

I cannot imagine how the above hairspring could be formed without curve tweezers. Did all who give good advice ever make a Breguet coil?

These tweezers were not available 30 years ago when I started, so I made my own curve tweezers from normal steel ones. A bit of work, but never regretted.

Frank

Hi Frank,

I see a market gap here, could you please explain how did you make your own tweezers so we could fill that gap?

Lui

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While these specialized tweezers do make things easier they are not essential. Gazeley and Fried (others I'm sure) show ways to raise an overvoil, and you can form the curves freehand with two tweezers and some practice. Honestly most overcoils I've made I've done without the special tweezers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, luiazazrambo said:

Hi Frank,

I see a market gap here, could you please explain how did you make your own tweezers so we could fill that gap?

Lui

Hi,

it was mainly filing and a bit grinding.
Origin was a steel tweezers of this type, which I had a lot of:

TW1_0.jpg.ab0d014bb9abb96bbf9f03714cbe9a6f.jpg

Some pictures of the curve tweezers:

TW1_2.jpg.8e3dbac9d10e19d36ddb29559566c04e.jpgTW1_1.jpg.b25a40612f6f47ae83b4204e92897f28.jpgTW1_3.jpg.9a8363d53ad8a6f826fa35840a3bb18f.jpg

Frank

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2019 at 8:58 PM, nickelsilver said:

"I remember visiting Parmigiani back turn of the century and there was a lady doing a really small caliber overcoil, I think she took about 5 minutes to time it with an old school vibrating tool and like 30 seconds to raise and form the coil with the special tweezers.

It'd be a half day work with the same equipment for a competent hairspring guy who didn't do them all day like she did."

Could I have the lady's phone number please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 8/21/2019 at 6:39 PM, jdm said:

Worth to remind once again that as Master nickelsilver nicely explained, the 00 size available from  Cousins UK, is the smallest of all were once available, and is good for the tiniest hairspring only.

Today I received from Cousins UK the size 00 Dumont overcoil raising tweezers for the  'tiniest' hairsrings - see below. When the insert for adjustment of the hairspring thickness is fully closed there remains a gap that is larger than the thickness of a typical 11.5 lignes hairspring. The last photo shows this gap and the tip of the hairspring.

As supplied, because the hairspring is not held firmly enough in the gap, the tweezers twist the hairspring when the raising bend is made . Conclusion: for these hairsprings, and anything smaller, the end tip of the tweezers must be re-worked to close the residual gap. Swiss made but not Swiss quality.

1439846132_Ovecoiltweezerslogo.jpg.8519cf3ddbbbe390d26236384ebe682c.jpg

464836032_Overcoiltweezers00.jpg.31214a1e20d6230d100fa0a6453a61c3.jpg

1503986800_Overcoiltweezerstip.jpg.62819a79517c6b26e94a9130ed8d418f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/5/2020 at 3:56 PM, nickelsilver said:

That's a shame, but looks like and easy fix with an Arkansas stone.

This 1200 grit diamond wheel produced a nice square end to the tubular section. But I then had to countersink the end of the tube by a small amount because the sliding inner part has a radius in the region arrowed. Finally I had to dome the end of the locking screw. As supplied it was flat and tightening the screw increased the gap as it pushed the inner slider outwards. I wonder if these tweezers are second sourced from India?

 

wheel.jpg.1402f34a92100b4939ad270acdadb5a7.jpg

 

radius.jpg.37d2c771cb0fbf2d0a2abacf03817f9a.jpg

tip.jpg.726899f2e75d0560f3d96c207f51e345.jpg

 

Edited by Watcher
detail
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 8/18/2019 at 2:58 PM, nickelsilver said:

Won't be in the shop till Tuesday probably, but will say I've done a bunch of overcoil springs from scratch and only rarely use these specialized tweezers. There are other ways to raise the coil and I usually form the curve with two #5s. The special tweezers are useful when doing several or more of the same, you can set the coil raising ones up to repeat well, and find the curving ones that suit the form you're doing. I remember visiting Parmigiani back turn of the century and there was a lady doing a really small caliber overcoil, I think she took about 5 minutes to time it with an old school vibrating tool and like 30 seconds to raise and form the coil with the special tweezers.

It'd be a half day work with the same equipment for a competent hairspring guy who didn't do them all day like she did.

@nickelsilver, do you still stand by this?  I read this whole thread and imagined my credit card melting in my wallet.  I do have two #5s however, and while I love tools...the problem I am currently facing (you know from that other thread on turning a staff) may be the only time I will have to make an overcoil and thus the only time I would use the tool(s).  If I bought that set of tools you have, I would force myself to do NOTHING BUT overcoil manufacture for the remainder of my life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

@nickelsilver, do you still stand by this?  I read this whole thread and imagined my credit card melting in my wallet.  I do have two #5s however, and while I love tools...the problem I am currently facing (you know from that other thread on turning a staff) may be the only time I will have to make an overcoil and thus the only time I would use the tool(s).  If I bought that set of tools you have, I would force myself to do NOTHING BUT overcoil manufacture for the remainder of my life!

Definitely. I have a friend who regularly makes overcoils, he uses the simple method where he grabs it in strong tweezers and pushes into wood to make the overcoil bends, and shapes by hand (to a diagram). He's passed several pieces through COSC that he's done.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I have a friend who regularly makes overcoils, he uses the simple method where he grabs it in strong tweezers and pushes into wood to make the overcoil bends

I found, too, this most simple method is the best.
I also have Watcher's tool, but was not happy with it. The spring is distorted considerably out of round and both knees will not be of identical angle as expected and must be corrected anyways.

But the curve bending tweezers I use very often and don't want to miss it 🙂

Frank

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...