Jump to content

My Roamer Cal. Mst402 From The 1960S


WillFly

Recommended Posts

Roamer Swiss watches have been very underrated in the past. Their movements up to the late '60s were very nice, though I'm not particularly keen on the Searock from the '70s or their later quartz offerings. This is an MST402 calibre - bought at an auction, along with two other watches, for £30! People seem to have caught on to Roamer, and the eBay prices for ones in good condition are rising steadily.

 

Roamer%20face.JPG

 

Roamer%20movement.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a watch has hour or minute or 5-minute markers which are not actual numerals but lines or arrows or some such, then they're commonly known as batons. In the Roamer above, the pointer shaped markers at 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 are batons, and the little lines that mark the minutes are also batons. If you wanted to be pedantic, you could say that the minute batons were on the outer "chapter" ring, that the numerals were in an inner chapter on a base of decorative lines - or some such.

 

Just a convenient way of describing the watch dial features, in the way that the seconds dial would be described as a countersunk sub-seconds dial at 6 o'clock. Hands might be pointers - like the Roamer - or spade, where they look like the card spade suit at the ends - or moon, where there's a hollow circle at the ends. So, if I was going to describe this dial on eBay, for example, I might write something like this:

 

"Clean white dial with an outer chapter of thin batons marking the minutes. An inner grooved chapter with raised gilded Arabic numerals at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 & 12 alternating with triangular raised batons at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 & 11. Slim triangular, pointed hour and minute hands with a countersunk sub-seconds dial at 6 o'clock and a gilded slim seconds hand. The dial is signed 'Roamer, Antimagnetic, Swiss Made' and is free of any hairlines, chips, marks, chips or scuffs."

 

And then, of course, you'd be dying to make a bid! :bow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is.
    • I recently bought this but not on ebay. I figured if I want something Japanese I better check Japanese auction sites since these don't seem to pop up on ebay. I paid 83 € plus shipping & taxes. I think it was pretty reasonable for a complete set in good condition.
    • Did you take the friction pinion off the large driving wheel and grease it? Although, now that I think about it, that shouldn't have any effect on the free running of the train if the friction pinion isn't interacting withe minute wheel/setting wheel...
    • I did in fact use Rodico to get the spring into general position and "hold" it there while I used a fine oiler to make subtle positional adjustments.
×
×
  • Create New...