Jump to content

Fitting the mainspring notch into the notch on the barrel


Recommended Posts

This is a very old (1950s-era) First Moscow Watch Factory Mockba watch. The mainspring has two little rectangles that stick out up and down from the bent-back tongue part of the mainspring. I assume these rectangle bits are to fit into two corresponding notches in the barrel and ratchet wheel (please see attached picture). However, when inserting the mainspring into the barrel to wind it, I'm having a hell-of-a-time getting the mainspring to fit into the barrel notch. After it's all coiled, the notched tongue of the mainspring doesn't really fit into the barrel notch, and so it sticks up. Thus, the ratchet wheel can't quite fit down all the way. Is there a trick to it? Should I just file off the notches on the mainspring so it goes in any which way (that must be a terrible practice... but would it work?)

 

Thank you!! :)

+rUULWPqSrSSwLDMkQdehQ.jpg

QSqqltfeQgiw3q86TTIZUg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Insert the spring. Then, you can hold the barrel down and scoot the end around to drop it in the notch. You have to go "end first", normally clockwise (it'll bind the other way). When it's seated in the barrel but in the arbor and then cap lining up the cap notch.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

Insert the spring. Then, you can hold the barrel down and scoot the end around to drop it in the notch. You have to go "end first", normally clockwise (it'll bind the other way). When it's seated in the barrel but in the arbor and then cap lining up the cap notch.

Thank you! This is very helpful, and definitely points me in the right direction. I suspected that might be the correct procedure. When you say "end first," do you mean it should go towards the apex of the bend in the tongue (leftwards, as represented by the character "<") or towards the end of the tongue and spring, which is doubled back towards the direction in which I insert the spring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you! This is very helpful, and definitely points me in the right direction. I suspected that might be the correct procedure. When you say "end first," do you mean it should go towards the apex of the bend in the tongue (leftwards, as represented by the character "
Just look at the end of the spring, and imagine if it were to grow from the outer end that's the direction to push it. I do it with a screwdriver on the "ear" or whatever you might call it that's sticking up, but a piece of brass would be better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:
1 hour ago, DoctoralHermit said:
Thank you! This is very helpful, and definitely points me in the right direction. I suspected that might be the correct procedure. When you say "end first," do you mean it should go towards the apex of the bend in the tongue (leftwards, as represented by the character "

Just look at the end of the spring, and imagine if it were to grow from the outer end that's the direction to push it. I do it with a screwdriver on the "ear" or whatever you might call it that's sticking up, but a piece of brass would be better.

Okay! So I ended up following your directions, and had to apply a bit of extra lube on the top of the inside wall of the barrel, but it seemed to fit mostly into place. I then placed a cover to protect the barrel and used the pliers a bit to clamp it into place, as the barrel wouldn't seem to close with just my fingers pressing. Does this mean I've screwed up somehow? Side note: it's okay if I've broken this one... I have extras, this is just for practice so I don't screw up my good spring and barrel assembly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...