Jump to content

Making the micro regulator adjustments


Recommended Posts

I would like to hear the various techniques for making the fine regulator lever adjustments and beat adjustment, when available on the upper side of the balance bridge.

If you get within 0.8ms in beat, what are you doing to get it tweaked to 0.1 to -0.1 ?  I use a double loupe magnification on my reader glasses and sometimes seem to go too much one way and then again too much in the other direction when fiddling with this.

Thanks,

George

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most likely, most of us are like yourself, it's like a dance.

I try to brace my hand and use a twisting motion with the tool rather than a push to move in very tiny increments.

Also I recommend restarting the timegrapher after an adjustment and allowing a few seconds for the amplitude to settle.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great thought.
To prevent any marks from a tool such as a metal screwdriver, I could fashion a plastic pixie stick or a piece of peg-wood to a flat end and give that a slight twist for control. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, m1ks said:

...Also I recommend restarting the timegrapher after an adjustment...

Why do you recommend restarting it? I'm going to buy a timegrapher, and I was thinking in a weishi 1900 instead of the 1000, just because I've read that the dot lines in the graphic are dual color, helping in setting the beat error as you will notice if you've gone too far in the adjustment. But if restarting is a recommendation then I don't see any advantage against model 1000.

Edited by aac58
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aac58 said:

Why do you recommend restarting it? I'm going to buy a timegrapher, and I was thinking in a weishi 1900 instead of the 1000, just because I've read that the dot lines in the graphic are dual color, helping in setting the beat error as you will notice if you've gone too far in the adjustment. But if restarting is a recommendation then I don't see any advantage against model 1000.

My reason for restarting:

I am using the 1000 model and after attempting to adjust beat error, with a +-3 s/day watch as an example, I may be trying to adjust beat where the graph will have one line on the top edge of the display and the other on the bottom.  I can stop/start the machine and get the graph back in the middle of the display for better reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies for not clarifying re the timegrapher but first, I should also have mentioned, I use a piece of pegwood, (one end a point, the other a flat edge like a screwdriver) to adjust the regulating arm, for the aforementioned potential problem of leaving marks.
Restarting isn't necessary at all, just that it seems to take longer to pick up the difference if left running than if you press stop then strart, I haven't timed it, it just seems that way to me, but either way, you'll need to allow a few seconds for the beat to settle back into a smooth rhythm.
The dual coloured lines are useful, and even restarting will still work, you just note whether the blue or the yellow line was uppermost. I find it useful because if you go from a small BE like 0.5 to 0.3, you could 0.3 on the opposite side and the lines are so close you can't tell on the screen so the split colour helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead of pushing on the regulator, try little sideways taps. Here a screwdriver works better than pegwood. Little taps, not hard knocks. This works for me when chasing the last few ms.

Good luck.

Anilv

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, anilv said:

Instead of pushing on the regulator, try little sideways taps. Here a screwdriver works better than pegwood. Little taps, not hard knocks. This works for me when chasing the last few ms.

Good advice!
Problem is the higher sticking friction against lower sliding friction. The force needed to break the regulator arm free is higher than the force needed to move on the sliding arm. Pushing, you cannot avoid to push too far.

I made a tool (slotted brass rod with a big radio button on the upper end) for better feeling:  the mentioned problem gets a bit smaller but is still there.

Now I mainly use a screwdriver with brass blade and tap with the back of my tweezers.
Thus you always apply a limited amount of energy and overshoot can be avoided.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another idea that may work, when the regulator arm extends over the cock-plate, would be to have a brass screwdriver blade size 60 or 80, and place the edge just under the side of the regulator arm and pry the arm in the direction desired by raising the screwdriver handle up in a leveraging method. 

I don't have a watch currently to show an image of but I've put this image together.

micro_regulation.png?raw=1

Edited by GeorgeC
edit image text explanation
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This post has some pictures that describe how to get the spring back into the setting without having to disassemble anything.  With patience, this approach works.  The advice that the spring will ‘float’ back in when positioned just right is spot on. If you try to push it so it flexes and pops back into the setting, it’ll probably just fly away, as you’ve already found.  Hope that helps, Mark
    • I recognize myself all too well. It takes a lot of experience and discipline to recognize when it's time to cancel and come back at a later time. Very well said! We should have a forum dedicated to this topic as it is critical to achieve success when working on watches. It's a lot more important than most other things related to watch repair. And yes, just a short break can make a world of difference!
    • Hello Wai and welcome to the forum. A little information to enlighten you a little more TZIllustratedGlossary.pdf
    • I am certainly not the first one who happen to ruin the chronograph center-wheel of a Seiko 6139B. The internet, when you search for it, is littered with stories, even here on WRT there are some. One of the problems is that the service manual of the 6139A is readily available on the net, not so with the service manual of the 6139B. On top, reading other forums & stories, there are people who claim that there is hardly any difference between the 6139A and the 6139B movement, so the 6139A service manual will suffice. However, one of the crucial differences is the design of the chronograph center-wheel. Also the Seiko reference numbers are different. For the 6139A, the reference number for the chronograph center-wheel is 888610 and for the 6139B: 888611 or 888612, depending on which manual you are reading (and perhaps there is a difference between these two wheel too !??) To lubricated the 6139A chronograph center-wheel, the following graphic picture in the 6139A service manual is given; One has to press down the sprocket and oil it. Unaware of the difference in chrono center-wheel design, I pressed down on the sprocket, but there was no movement. Perhaps not understanding or interpreting the drawing correctly, I pressed with the tweezers on the 4th wheel. This caused the 4th wheel, which turned out to be a press fit to the sprocket by the 6139B, to strip off the sprocket. Thereby me joining the line of all the others, who tried this before and are now searching for "how to fix" this misfortune. In an older thread on WRT, member @ricardopalamino place a picture in which he shows the difference in center-wheel design between the 6139A and the 6139B. To the left the 6139B and to the right the 6139A. As can be seen on the left center-wheel, the 4th wheel is pressed onto a sprocket. Pressing down on it, as shown in the 6139A service manual, gives a ruinous result. People did several attempts to repair the damage, but so far, I haven't found a success story. Here is one of the attempts; Reading what already has been tried, I tried a different approach ..... but sadly failed too. Nevertheless, I'll show what I've done; perhaps somebody may fine-tune or expand on the idea and has success? In my staking set was an anvil with a 4.5mm hole, exact the size needed to fit the chrono center-wheel "up-side-down". The distance between the clutch parts and the 4th wheel was 0.25mm. To support the 4th wheel as close as possible up to its center, I used feeler gauge blades, on one side a 0.25mm blade, and on the other side a combination of 0.15mm + 0.10mm blades. This allowed me to tap the sprocket back onto the 4th wheel ...... The thickness of 0.25 blades doesn't prevent some "spring" action, and so my 4th wheel was slightly deformed. The re-attachment seemed successful, but when trying to true the wheel, the connection failed again 😭 Currently there is a NOS 6139B chronograph center-wheel on eBay. Last Sunday the price was €150, on Monday the seller increased the price to €165 !!         Prevention is better than the cure and I do hope that anyone in the future, searching for a 6139 manual, with read my "Warning". As for my Seiko, I'm not going to invest €165 for one part and since the rest is pretty good, I will sell the watch for "parts or repair" 😞  
    • Off the top of my head I can't remember which was which, but one of the hands had the clutch with the very fine radial teeth as described above, the other had a flat disc with two tiny 'pins', there was what looked like the remains of something black smeared on the opposite face, maybe the remains of rotted rubber? When I can get some good pictures of both I will post
×
×
  • Create New...