Jump to content

Mercury pendulum tubes


wls1971

Recommended Posts

I have a french four glass clock that has a mercury pendulum, I have noticed that the tubes where placed upside down I have placed them the right way up, how long does it take for the mercury to run to the bottom of the tubes because its not exactly free running stuff, I think it would be pointless trying to regulate the clock until it has is this correct ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure its a real mercury pendulum?

I've heard of cheaper clocks having fake mercury pendulums, could it be the pendulum was taken apart and put together incorrectly with the pretend mercury parts upside down?

The whole point of mercury is it is liquid and flows freely as Old Hippy says

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I see the clock is a genuine French Four Glass. Mercury can solidify only with extreme cold. Myself I have never come across these what I will call dummy type pendulums. It would probably be best to replace them. I don’t think here in the UK you can post mercury.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tmuir said:

Are you sure its a real mercury pendulum?

I've heard of cheaper clocks having fake mercury pendulums, could it be the pendulum was taken apart and put together incorrectly with the pretend mercury parts upside down?

The whole point of mercury is it is liquid and flows freely as Old Hippy says

No I'm sure these are mercury its a very good quality french clock I dont think they are replacement mercury vials I may put them in some slightly warm water and see if that helps.

 

6 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

From what I see the clock is a genuine French Four Glass. Mercury can solidify only with extreme cold. Myself I have never come across these what I will call dummy type pendulums. It would probably be best to replace them. I don’t think here in the UK you can post mercury.

Thats the problem they only seem to be readily available in America and I think it would be illegal to try and import mercury via the postal service into England and they are also very expensive.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

From the photos, those tubes look a little more sophisticated than simple glass phials containing mercury. It looks like they may be double-walled tubes, where the mercury sits in the annular space between inner and outer glass walls. That would explain the strange behaviour of the mercury. 

Can you get a really good close-up shot of one of the tubes looking at the top of the mercury? Try to see if there’s a visible meniscus in a ring. 

This is only a hunch as I’ve never handled one of these myself!

Phil G4SPZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
On 6/18/2019 at 6:46 PM, wls1971 said:

I have a french four glass clock that has a mercury pendulum, I have noticed that the tubes where placed upside down I have placed them the right way up, how long does it take for the mercury to run to the bottom of the tubes because its not exactly free running stuff, I think it would be pointless trying to regulate the clock until it has is this correct ?

I know this is an old post. As a dentist, I've worked with mercury a lot. Mercury does not solidify at room temperature.

And when it melts in hot water, that sounds like the sister element of mercury, Gallium. 

Just out of curiosity, after the vials cooled, did the "mercury" remain a liquid or did it resolidify?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The odd behaviour suggests some other alloy, or the mercury is somehow sticking to the glass.

There are a number of low temperature alloys including Woods metal that might work as pendulum, since they contain heavy metals like bismuth and lead, and which become liquid at less than the boiling point of water.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood's_metal

Mercury amalgams are very odd.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JW8YGTdTjA

 

.. and then there is Gallium

 

 

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Would you believe Gallium was proposed as a safer alternative to mercury amalgam fillings for teeth!

I guess it depends on how you define "safe". Not particularly safe if you drop one of your gallium fillings on the floor of a 747, half way across the Atlantic, but then again I think mercury is banned on flights for a very similar reason. 

The interesting thing about gallium is how little of it you need to completely destroy the integrity of aluminium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I have been unable to check the tubes on the clock I originally posted, because I gave the clock to my dad for his 75th birthday, so because of the covid situation I have not seen either it or my parents for a long time, but I would agree with the above post that the air in the tubes prevents the mercury moving in the end the warm water I used to warm the tubes made it more viscous and helped get it moving.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...