Jump to content
  • 0
margolisd

Keyless Works Problem

Question

I have a tricky keyless works issue which I can't seem to solve. This is an Omega 1030 movement (I've posted about it before). As you can see from the video, when you try to set the hands clockwise it goes "click click click" and the hands don't move. Anti-clockwise is fine. 

It's too difficult to film but I can see it is the clutch wheel teeth slipping over the intermediate wheel which drives the motion works. The intermediate wheel is attached to the date setting yolk. The story of this repair so far has been:

When I noticed the issue I found a broken tooth on the intermediate wheel. I had to replace the entire date setting yolk. But the issue remained.

Next I thought the cannon pinion was too tight. I tried a few techniques to loosen it but in the end I just replaced it. It's a brand new omega part and it feels just right, not too tight and not too loose. But the clicking remains.

So then I thought the clutch wheel was worn. I noticed it's not an original part. I replaced it. And also the date setting yolk spring as I thought maybe the tension was wrong. But still no luck!

The only other idea I have is that the clutch lever / set lever are worn and they're not quite pushing the clutch wheel up against the intermediate wheel enough. But before I mortgage my house to pay for more parts I thought I'd see if any of you had any ideas. Thanks for reading!

 

IMG_1697.jpeg

IMG_1701.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Oh. I solved it. Two minutes after posting. The indicated plate has lost its spring. It's not pushing down enough on the date set yolk. A little bending with stout tweezers seems to have done the trick.

The process of posting here and documenting things makes you think very clearly about the problem. Just looking at my own photos gave me the idea! :woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon:

IMG_1697.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Okay. Back to the drawing board. The problem has returned. I think by bending the plate slightly I was just gripping the date change yolk more. But the underlying problem was still there. The only thing I can think of is that the indicated area is worn and the lever is not being pushed as far left as it needs to go...

 

Untitled.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I have tried to replicate the error you describe but failed, the only thing what seems making sense is your first diagnose with the cannon pinion. Try to broach it slightly and oil it and see what happens.
Here is s shot of one of my candidates at trial run.. You can compare the positions of the keyless work.

IMG_20190528_185145.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

What are you using to lubricate the setting parts?

1 hour ago, HSL said:

I have tried to replicate the error you describe but failed, the only thing what seems making sense is your first diagnose with the cannon pinion. Try to broach it slightly and oil it and see what happens.
Here is s shot of one of my candidates at trial run.. You can compare the positions of the keyless work.

In your Picture is the canon pinion circled?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
3 hours ago, yankeedog said:

how is the stem?worn or out of square?

The stem is new and original! It engages the clutch wheel perfectly (also new).

1 hour ago, HSL said:

I have tried to replicate the error you describe but failed, the only thing what seems making sense is your first diagnose with the cannon pinion. Try to broach it slightly and oil it and see what happens.
Here is s shot of one of my candidates at trial run.. You can compare the positions of the keyless work.

HSL. Great photo, thank you. It's so hard to tell on the positions because we may be talking a hair's width. Gentle pressure on the lever pushing it more left does stop the clicking (but I guess that's obvious!).

You see the line I've indicated on this picture? On my watch there is a slight gap. Is yours the same? Can you measure it?

28 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

What are you using to lubricate the setting parts?

9501 :)

25 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

In your Picture is the canon pinion circled?

No, that's not the cannon pinion. It's actually in the centre.

IMG_1699.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
38 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

In your Picture is the canon pinion circled?

lol.. no that's just a residue from my little investigation think it is the sweep second pinion which hold that lower gear in place when setting the time. I just have a habbit to mark the area I work with now I forgott to take it away..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yes there is a distinct difference and you can see it by the arrow by the setting lever too, had a look at two more Genevas with 1030 and both are identical to my first picture. Your just seems to be worn down. 

Image1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I have a 1030 I discarded because of some rust on the regulator and HS but it has a complete and nice keyless work... just in case you don't find all parts..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thanks but I located the parts for hardly anything on eBay. It has helped a lot. It's still not perfect. Weirdly, it was better with the old clutch wheel. I think the cannon pinion must be a tiny bit tight. I added some more grease which also heloed. Now the only time it clicks is when you set the hands far enough forward to advance the calendar wheel. But it's hardly noticeable. I think I'm going to call this completed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I had this problem also.  Same symptoms.  Turned out i had both springs switched.   They are different links and when placed wrong, it wont allow the yoke to fully advance the clutch wheel into the setting wheel (click, click, click).  Make sure the longer spring is on 6 o'clock side and short spring is on 12 o'clock side.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, asked the seller the same question and got the following reply: "The upper die rotates when the spindle is turned. The lower die is fixed." So, I guess this isn't an MKS 46610 copy after all, or the seller doesn't know what he is talking about. I did send the pictures to him. See if I can press him to select either picture A or picture B. Getting a decent press for armoured UB glasses without spending a fortune is beginning to feel surreal...
    • Installation of the PWM Controller. This needed two new mounting holes to be drilled in the main base of the watch machine, the old rheostat fixing points being way too far away to be useful. Thankfully - and by one of those happy coincidences that just make your day, when they happen - two new fixing holes could be drilled and they would be hidden by the old control knob when it was in place. Happy Days! As can be seen in the photos below, the new controller occupies far less space and, just by itself, is a much safer solution than the original.  I also hope that motor speed control will be far smoother than with the original. I will still make up an internal cover of sorts, just because I can, and I because am minded to. I cleaned up the old Bakelite knob a little and ran a little silver paint into the arrow head engraving, to brighten it up. And, as can be seen, the two new mounting holes for the PWM controller are hidden by the knob. Result! Finally, I replaced the original mounting screws for the old controller, so I did not have holes left on the dial. I think this is the best compromise I could have arrived at, as at least from the outside, the old machine looks to be still original and nothing visibly takes away from its undoubted age. After all - I am dealing with something likely to be over 75 years old and I was trying to take nothing away from that. That's it for the base unit - so all that remains is to remount the motor etc. to the base and rewire it all. The jars have been cleaned, I have fitted new rubber seals to the jar lids - I decided against cork as although likely to have been more original - I also had some nitrile rubber sheet to hand and used that instead. I can always refit this with cork later, if I find out for sure these old National machines used cork.  Nothing "build related" for a couple days as I have other work to do, but hoping to get it finished at the weekend. Maybe a short testing video sometime after that. Thanks for reading.
    • I certainly did not want to replace the motor, as this is so very visible, all attempts at maintaining the illusion of originality would fail. A solution to the problem could only be achieved with a safer, replacement speed control, which could work with the original mains voltage motor. Fortunately, these are readily available in the form of a Pulse Width Modulated (PWM), motor speed controller circuit. These will take in the 220V incoming mains supply and provide a variable output of between 50V and the incoming supply voltage. These are well known devices and proven to work with even simple (old) motors. So, a PWM circuit was obtained (at incredibly reasonable cost), and measured up. In an attempt to at least have the "illusion" of originality, I was determined to use the original hole for the rotary speed control, as well as the original Bakelite control knob. With the shaft on the rotary potentiometer too short for this, I had to do some more metal bashing. As can be seen below, I used the old rheostat as a donor, for a short length of it's shaft, which I would mate to the new potentiometer, allowing the Bakelite knob to operate. This was cut to shape and filed to mate with the new potentiometer shaft. This was then soldered together and thus ready for installation. You can see in the photo, the size and technical comparison between the old rheostat and the new PWM controller circuit.  
    • Next up is the motor speed control. I did think long and hard about my original aim of maintaining as much originality as possible. And, there is no doubt that the original speed control rheostat was a) original and b) functional. But - as I was an electronics technician in an earlier life, and also health and safety professional in a more recent life, the safety aspects weighed heavily upon my concience. Logic played it's part as well - with the original rheostat put back into service, albeit with some hand-made guarding to keep out the fingers of the unwary, it would be safe-ish, for me to use, as long as I kept my wits about me. BUT NOT SAFE FOR ANYONE ELSE unaware of what was underneath. Only the knowledge of what lurked underneath would be keeping me safe, but anyone else might not have a second chance. As can be seen from the photo below, all of the wire on the resistors is not only unguarded, but within millimetres of the level of the base. Also, the incoming mains terminals to the rheostat are also dangerously unguarded. With today's knowledge, it is difficult to fathom how this ever could have been considered safe to use.
    • Back to the job in hand. I managed to find the cork I thought I may have had, lurking in a box under the stairs. It was the most part of an A4 sized sheet, so more than enough for my purposes - to sit the jars on whilst they are in the machine. Looking at the metal bases, I really can't be convinced if there ever was any cork or any other material for that matter there. But for me anyway, the idea of the glass jars sitting directly on the metal base just seems wrong and I would prefer some cork there as a cushion. It's about as tidy as it needs to be, given the shape of the metal webbing. I suppose I could have cut-out squares of cork, but then it would leave potential weak, unsupported areas of cork, which would likely need some form of strengthening. Anyway - this application suits me and helps the jars sit a bit more stable in their locations. Whilst I am in the vicinity, so to speak, I have also added an earth lead which will bond the chassis to the incoming mains lead, once fitted. This is visible in these photos.  
×
×
  • Create New...