Jump to content

Seconds hand erratic.


Recommended Posts

So, I got my seconds hand looking a bit more how I wanted it to look. But when I put it on and wound the watch it is very erratic and not moving smoothly. I’ve since stripped it down again and checked the teeth on the pinion and the wheel that drives it, I thought there might have been some debris lodged. I did wonder whether the pipe on the hand might have been binding inside the cannon pinion but it doesn’t seem like it. It doesn’t seem to affect the running of the watch either it doesn’t stop or falter. Any suggestions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no tensioner spring and I did try some lube. The only thing that I can see is where the pinion sits on the bridge as it passes through the cannon pinion. The face is a bit worn and uneven. I tried a tiny amount of oil there, it seems no better than when dry.  I wonder if this is why there was no seconds hand fitted to it, maybe it’s something that bugged the previous owner of goodness knows how many years ago, so they had it taken off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Davey57 said:

The only thing that I can see is where the pinion sits on the bridge as it passes through the cannon pinion. The face is a bit worn and uneven. 

You'll have to disassemble and troubleshoot to get to the root of the cause. Can you take a picture of the area you've mentioned?

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To get to the root of the cause, you may have to disassemble . But before you do that, I gather this is a replacement sweep hand? What is the movement  make and caliber and are you sure this is the correct size sweep hand for the movement. If the watch is running steadily while the sweep hand stutters and there is no tension spring, then the seep second pipe  is either the wrong size, or it was squeezed onto the pivot....can you provide more info?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Davey57 said:

It was the wrong pipe size for the pivot. I gave it a gentle squeeze until it gripped just enough to hold the hand in place. I can also take some pictures and try to show the wear I mentioned. 

OK, so the issue is the pipe on the hand. I've had this happen before, and I suggest you get the correct size hand to avoid problems later. Even if you get the hand to stay on and tick correctly, it will eventually fall off--usually while you're wearing the watch.

J

Edited by noirrac1j
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes the hand behave so erratically?  Is it just that occasionally the pivot is spinning a tiny amount until it finds a grip on the tube?  Finding the correct sized hand seems to a bit of a hit and miss affair so far. I measured the pivot to be .21, I found a second hand from a Seiko that is quoted as having that size. It was far too small so I ordered a .23 and a .25. The .23 I received was still way too small and the .25 simply dropped onto the pipe.  Many thanks for your help by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davey57 said:

What makes the hand behave so erratically?  Is it just that occasionally the pivot is spinning a tiny amount until it finds a grip on the tube?  Finding the correct sized hand seems to a bit of a hit and miss affair so far. I measured the pivot to be .21, I found a second hand from a Seiko that is quoted as having that size. It was far too small so I ordered a .23 and a .25. The .23 I received was still way too small and the .25 simply dropped onto the pipe.  Many thanks for your help by the way.

Yes, you've got it right, The pipe wobbles a bit on the pivot until there's friction at which point it grabs and ticks, and when it reaches a loose spot it stops, etc. etc. Aftermarket hands are usually tight, but what is the make and caliber?

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
    • Hold the crown when in winding position, move the click away from the crown wheel, and then while holding the crown let it slowly unwind. I recollect that you must remove the automatic device bridge first, but maybe I'm wrong. You can first try without removing the automatic device bridge.
    • nevenbekriev- You nailed it with your description of me and my reaction when the clock started ticking again. I am a newbie.  I love the sound and idea of mechanical clocks but the idea of owning one and trying to keep them running has never appealed to me. My wife bought this one and an antique German wall clock.  When I looked into having someone repair them for me, the universal response was "it's really expensive to work on them, you should just replace the movement". So, I had nothing to lose, I started researching them and opened them up. The wife is happy because she hears the sound of the clocks again. But I have gone down the "accuracy" rabbit hole. In the vertical position, the balance wheel was not floating. It was sitting on the bottom of the frame. I adjusted the lower spring collet and got it floating. It easily passed the 270 degree 3 to 5 minute oscillation test. It took 8 minutes for the wheel to completely stop moving.  I put it the unit back in the movement and checked the safety pin. It does not touch the safety roller anywhere in +/-270 degrees rotation from neutral position. But the amplitude of the rotation with the spring fully wound is weak based on what you are saying. It rotates +/-90 degrees from the neutral position.  No, I did not take the movement completely apart.  That seemed way outside my skill set at the time. There is a reason I became an electrical engineer and not a mechanical engineer. I am much more comfortable with moving electrons than tiny moving metal parts. Will I do it in the long run? Anything can happen. I don't seem to be able to let it go.
×
×
  • Create New...