Jump to content

Balance staff help - OC 71 (OC 120; Rego 153?)


Recommended Posts

Hi

I have a pin lever movement that needs fixing ... a common problem of a broken pivot on the balance staff. The movement has 'OC 71' on it but I have been unable to find any information about this particular movement. It does however looks similar to the OC 120 seen at http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&a&2uswk&OC_120 (which is a Rego 153).

Not being able to find any information on the OC route I sourced a balance complete for the Rego 153. This however is a dead end as the balance staff design is completely different. The picture below shows the issue.

2084077365_OC71.JPG.ff48420badcf8b7b0a55d077935963b7.JPG

The balance wheel on the left is the original where the balance roller can be separated. The balance staff from the Rego 153 balance complete is on the right; its design is completely different (and with the roller integrated into the balance wheel). Long story short there's no way it will work with the OC movement I have.

I am now stuck on what to do. With no information on the OC 71 how can I source an appropriate balance staff?  :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi
I have a pin lever movement that needs fixing ... a common problem of a broken pivot on the balance staff. The movement has 'OC 71' on it but I have been unable to find any information about this particular movement. It does however looks similar to the OC 120 seen at http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&a&2uswk&OC_120 (which is a Rego 153).
Not being able to find any information on the OC route I sourced a balance complete for the Rego 153. This however is a dead end as the balance staff design is completely different. The picture below shows the issue.
2084077365_OC71.JPG.ff48420badcf8b7b0a55d077935963b7.JPG
The balance wheel on the left is the original where the balance roller can be separated. The balance staff from the Rego 153 balance complete is on the right; its design is completely different (and with the roller integrated into the balance wheel). Long story short there's no way it will work with the OC movement I have.
I am now stuck on what to do. With no information on the OC 71 how can I source an appropriate balance staff?  :blink:

I could make one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow @Nucejoe and @jdrichard ... you are amazing!

This is a pretty basic pin lever movement and would normally go on the uneconomical-to-repair pile but I've gotten soft in my old age and would like to get it going. That's an incredibly generous offer @jdrichard but on such a basic movement it would be criminal to waste your talents; perhaps I keep this offer open for when I have something of greater horological value! <_<

@Nucejoe you've given me an idea that maybe I should get one of those job lot of staffs that come up on ebay and chance there is something to fit! On the off chance however that you can help identify a Ronda number with what I have then...

96966403_OC71balancestaff.JPG.5bac68d78183098ea20f97a2740ec696.JPG

A: current height is 3.90 however this is with the broken lower pivot. If I say around 0.20mm for a pivot length (reasonable?) then this would actually make the balance staff height around 4.10mm.

B: lower pivot to top of balance / collet seat is 2.10mm. Again allowing for 0.20mm for the missing pivot this would then actually be 2.30mm.

C: collet shoulder diameter is 0.7mm.

D: roller shoulder diameter is 0.6mm.

Dimensions are 'approximately accurate' i.e. taken as best I could with digital calipers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

Wow @Nucejoe and @jdrichard ... you are amazing!

This is a pretty basic pin lever movement and would normally go on the uneconomical-to-repair pile but I've gotten soft in my old age and would like to get it going. That's an incredibly generous offer @jdrichard but on such a basic movement it would be criminal to waste your talents; perhaps I keep this offer open for when I have something of greater horological value! <_<

@Nucejoe you've given me an idea that maybe I should get one of those job lot of staffs that come up on ebay and chance there is something to fit! On the off chance however that you can help identify a Ronda number with what I have then...

96966403_OC71balancestaff.JPG.5bac68d78183098ea20f97a2740ec696.JPG

A: current height is 3.90 however this is with the broken lower pivot. If I say around 0.20mm for a pivot length (reasonable?) then this would actually make the balance staff height around 4.10mm.

B: lower pivot to top of balance / collet seat is 2.10mm. Again allowing for 0.20mm for the missing pivot this would then actually be 2.30mm.

C: collet shoulder diameter is 0.7mm.

D: roller shoulder diameter is 0.6mm.

Dimensions are 'approximately accurate' i.e. taken as best I could with digital calipers!

According to balancestaffs.com, The closest would be rego 148, correct you are153, 154, 148, 1149 linge 13.5 .

I forwarded the pic you posted to this retired repairman  just by the looks he says he got the staff but not the impulse pin and added looks like you can use an impulse pin, looks damaged.

To get the exact right staff, we now need a friend with micrometer.   I,ll dig in my bag of tricks for possible complete balance, don,t even know if spare ones were marketed.

Next I,ll check your birthday date.

Regards

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @Nucejoe that's very useful and with that information I've looked at balancestaffs.com. The problem with the Rego 148 I see is that the staff design does not look quite right plus the shoulder widths are too large.

You are quite correct ... the original staff had a balance roller that slides onto the staff. I removed this (and it's shown in my original pic) and would be the part that slides onto the 0.6mm roller shoulder.

But your mention of balancestaffs.com gave me an idea for a reverse look up attempt. They measure to the 100th of a mm and because my staff height measurement is an approximation I played with look ups for heights from 4.05 (405) to 4.15 (415). From this I came across a possible fit for a balance staff with Ronda number 1912. Okay this is for a Waltham but dimensions for the crucial areas come up close to my measurements. Mmm ... could be worth a punt maybe.

 

Edited by WatchMaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WatchMaker said:

Thanks @Nucejoe that's very useful and with that information I've looked at balancestaffs.com. The problem with the Rego 148 I see is that the staff design does not look quite right plus the shoulder widths are too large.

You are quite correct ... the original staff had a balance roller that slides onto the staff. I removed this (and it's shown in my original pic) and would be the part that slides onto the 0.6mm roller shoulder.

But your mention of balancestaffs.com gave me an idea for a reverse look up attempt. They measure to the 100th of a mm and because my staff height measurement is an approximation I played with look ups for heights from 4.05 (405) to 4.15 (415). From this I came across a possible fit for a balance staff with Ronda number 1912. Okay this is for a Waltham but dimensions for the crucial areas come up close to my measurements. Mmm ... could be worth a punt maybe.

 

Normally anyone who used to work on a certain caliber, should have bunch of scrap balances, from which a good impulse pin can be removed and reused. I don,t see that as anything unusual, The problem  is proper removal and installation which requires staking set and some skill, So as long as you got a good HS and the matching wheel , the rest is what used to be routinely done at repairshops. Another wheel is not a good option. Hardly any demand for parts to such old pieces so they are cheap.Once we know the right one, I think I should send two just to be on the safe side. I guess many diferent size staffs of similare shape we made for various calibers. 

I got a feeling this is one of those instances you see an old piece which gives a feeling of the golden days and you feel good bringing it back to life. I enjoy seeing you see the job through for that feeling and is truely worth it.  

I had no idea I could get this poetic.:lol:      regards

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:biggrin: As the saying goes:

You're a poet ... and you didn't know it!

It"s just the staff that is shot so I'll take a punt on the Waltham close match. I usually work on jewelled movements that are more commonplace so parts, even if pricey, can at least be obtained. Pure lack of information on OC calibres was the main enemy here but I have the tools and patience to at least give the Waltham close match staff a go! 

Perhaps recentlly reading the book Longitude has made me persevere on this pin lever. People struggled for many decades to get a device to measure time accurately and here we have the very essence of simplicity to do that in something very humble. The rose tinted specs come off with the lack of any shock protection though ... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Getting back to the issue which is us guys repairing or just enjoying horological exploits. The big worry now is how sound is Cousins as company going forward. The of cost if this 8 year legal battle will be astronomical. Cut backs will happen noticed already how the Cousins catalogue is half its size this year. The main supplier going out of business will hit the UK horological community in a big way.    On the Brexit issue it was about a sovereign country being able to make its own laws and trade with any country in the world. I cannot see what was wrong with this. For those who wish to re join the cost would be very high indeed.
    • Yes, it's the same (old) song and it's getting worse & worse;  
    • 🤔 leaving the EU meant that UK was no longer part of the convention and have already been turned down an independent reapplication. I'm pretty sure courts have to be held in Switzerland in this case. There will be a lot more watches stashed away in draws  tbh, folk wont be able to afford to maintain them. Cheap watches will be bought and top end watches by folk with plenty of cash that can pay for service and repair. The expensive once in a lifetime gifts and everything else inbetween will be at the forgotton when they stop working. I know i was being a numpty, get used to it 😄 Anybody that knows will boycott them, but besides repairers who will know. Nope will never buy one, i made that decision as soon as i learnt about this. 
    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
×
×
  • Create New...