Jump to content

Omega triple date


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I have also loved watches, both quartz and mechanical. I have recently celebrated a birthday milestone and my wife has treated me to a beautiful Omega triple date. Due to the pins in the bracelet refusing to come out for adjustment it was sent to Swatch in Southampton, this took almost eight weeks and was finally returned looking good.

The one thing that I feel isn't quite right is that the watch is gaining 15 seconds a day, as the watch was apparently serviced at the same time as he bracelet was adjusted I'm not overly impressed with the time keeping of the watch.

This is a 1993 build according to the serial number on the case back and therefore has the 1150 calibre movement, should the watch be keeping better time or should I give it a month for the movement to settle after its service.

Thanks for taking the time to read this,

 

Andy

IMG_20190511_171024.jpg

Edited by Andyastar
Picture of the watch
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say it dependes on which quality the movement is based on.
The 1150 was based on the Valjoux 7751 which came in three different grades.

1. Elabore' 
2. Top
3. Chronometre

Depending on which one it is based on the deviation in time differs.

Elaboré
Average daily rate: +/- 7 seconds
Maximum positional variation: 20 seconds
Isochronism between 0 and 24 hours: +/- 15 seconds

Top
Average daily rate: +/- 4 seconds
Maximum positional variation: 15 seconds
Isochronism between 0 and 24 hours: +/- 10 seconds

Chronometre
- adjusted and timed per COSC specification.

All these times are also depending on the position of the watch. 
As a curiousity theese movements based on the 7750 Never came in the Standard version.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, HSL said:

I would say it dependes on which quality the movement is based on.
The 1150 was based on the Valjoux 7751 which came in three different grades.

1. Elabore' 
2. Top
3. Chronometre

Depending on which one it is based on the deviation in time differs.

Elaboré
Average daily rate: +/- 7 seconds
Maximum positional variation: 20 seconds
Isochronism between 0 and 24 hours: +/- 15 seconds

Top
Average daily rate: +/- 4 seconds
Maximum positional variation: 15 seconds
Isochronism between 0 and 24 hours: +/- 10 seconds

Chronometre
- adjusted and timed per COSC specification.

All these times are also depending on the position of the watch. 
As a curiousity theese movements based on the 7750 Never came in the Standard version.

Hi HSL, How can we tell different grades apart, or if a 7750 is genuine? I read there probably are up to hundered versions, some fake ones of just slightly inferior quality  to the genuine. Some come with plastic lever, some 5 ball other with 7 in the rotor. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

37 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Hi HSL, How can we tell different grades apart, or if a 7750 is genuine? I read there probably are up to hundered versions, some fake ones of just slightly inferior quality  to the genuine. Some come with plastic lever, some 5 ball other with 7 in the rotor. 

Just realized I forgott to say Welcome Andy!

Nucejoe if someone asked me ten years ago how to determine whats fake or not I would have written a couple of rows, these days with for example Sellita making their own versions of a movement they used to do for ETA and the quality Seagull began to produce I would say ... I have no Idea anymore.. The different grades from ETA is easier since they use slightly different components, mainly in the escapement and balance. To make it more obvious for us laymen they usually also decorate the movemnet while the standard and elaborate' always have plain sufaces. Between the Top and chronometer it's the hours they put in to adjust the movement in some more positions, things like that is invisibble for the eye..
And on top of all this we have the different modifications manufacturers gets made or make inhouse.. One just have to have a finger and gut feeling from handling large amounts of watches..

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting a mechanical watch within an acceptable time tolerance is not straight forward. Watches run at different rates in different positions. So a watchmaker adjusts in the various positions to get a good average. However not every customer wears a watch the same, ie some take their watch off at night. If a watch is consistently, say 17 secs slow per day this can be adjusted. I read somewhere if a watch is consistently running fast what sometimes works is if the watch is removed at night and laid dial down this compensates for the gains during the day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...