Jump to content

Jaeger-LeCoultre caliber P478 Help


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

I've noticed older Lecoultres often have quite heavy lock on the escapement, and even with a new mainspring some adjustment is needed to get the amplitude up to a reasonable number.

I think you are quite right, it is very tricky indeed.

I just hope that after I will install a new mainspring and I will adjust the beat the number will increase a little bit more. If I will get it around 230 -250 I will be happy considering the fact that it is an old movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I corrected the beat error from 2.2-2.7 to a 0.5-0.7

I know is not perfect; anyway I consider it pretty close to be accepted like that.

The problem is now, after I correct the beat error the amplitude when down dramatically from 220 to 155-165. Perhaps after I will install the new mainspring will rise again.

It is pretty tricky to adjust all that.

I will keep you posted.

 

DC0D3B60-25FA-44A2-8380-24A3CF75081A.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Timing machines are interesting devices? You have to be very careful when interpreting the results that the results are actually what's really going on with the watch? If you look at your waveform from the beginning you'll notice that you do not have straight parallel lines there very irregular. This tells us your watch is having a very bad day. The timing machine does not have artificial intelligence so it doesn't look at the graphical display it just displays whatever it gets. Then it takes the numbers and gives you numbers but if the graphical display does not have the correct display like reasonably smooth parallel lines then numerically what you're seeing will not be correct. A example of this notice your watches keeping zero seconds fast or slow? But look at the graphical display at the time of zero seconds does that really look like zero seconds? The other thing when using the timing machine having a more than one position is very helpful. So wristwatch crown down position would be good so we can compare crown down with whichever dial position your timing in.

So when you put the watch in beat how did you do that and did you visually verify that it is indeed in beat?  Then other than the beat changing from cleaning how exactly did you clean the watch and the lubricants used?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Timing machines are interesting devices? You have to be very careful when interpreting the results that the results are actually what's really going on with the watch? If you look at your waveform from the beginning you'll notice that you do not have straight parallel lines there very irregular. This tells us your watch is having a very bad day. The timing machine does not have artificial intelligence so it doesn't look at the graphical display it just displays whatever it gets. Then it takes the numbers and gives you numbers but if the graphical display does not have the correct display like reasonably smooth parallel lines then numerically what you're seeing will not be correct. A example of this notice your watches keeping zero seconds fast or slow? But look at the graphical display at the time of zero seconds does that really look like zero seconds? The other thing when using the timing machine having a more than one position is very helpful. So wristwatch crown down position would be good so we can compare crown down with whichever dial position your timing in.

So when you put the watch in beat how did you do that and did you visually verify that it is indeed in beat?  Then other than the beat changing from cleaning how exactly did you clean the watch and the lubricants used?

As I’m pretty sure you know they are so many different ways to put a watch in beat.I will post two links showing the two methods that I use to correct the error beat in this particular movement. I hope I’m not crossing  any forum’s rules if I post the links to the videos here.

I used both methods in my case because the hair spring was twisted a bit. To answer to one of your direct question if I “visually verify if the watch is in beat”; yes I did verified that visually.

The beat error did not actually change because I cleaned and oiled the movement ; the error beat had to be corrected by using the two methods from above.

 

Edited by Doreen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Had a look round and it is indeed 45 lift angle.   Google the watch guy and lift angles there is a list for future reference.

 I actually found online several lift angles lists very useful. Thank you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Doreen said:

As I’m pretty sure you know they are so many different ways to put a watch in beat.I will post two links showing the two methods that I use to correct the error beat in this particular movement. I hope I’m not crossing  any forum’s rules if I post the links to the videos here.

I used both methods in my case because the hair spring was twisted a bit. To answer to one of your direct question if I “visually verify if the watch is in beat”; yes I did verified that visually.

The beat error did not actually change because I cleaned and oiled the movement ; the error beat had to be corrected by using the two methods from above.

 

I have to admit it is a intense back and forth work and a lots of adjustments and twisting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I finished to replace the main spring and I’m pretty happy with the results considering the fact that is an old movement. I know it is far away from being perfect and It could probably get a little bit of better results with the amplitude, beat error, etc. if I will adjust more the hairspring.

As I mentioned before the hair spring was twisted/distorted and it was not parallel with the balance wheel cock. That affected tremendously the good working condition of the watch(timing, beat error, amplitude).

I did a lots of adjustments to the hair spring and I set the watch properly in beat by aligning the roller jewel properly between the two banking pins.

 I diced to leave the watch the way it is at least for now.

I will attach a few images with different watch positions on the timegrapher.

Thank you all for your comments, advise and help.

B99D9D20-A79A-4D01-93FA-A26E4DCA4F81.jpeg

DAF43112-426F-4F75-9309-EDE046F7DEC6.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...