Jump to content

BFG 158 Balance complete with finger?


Recommended Posts

I want to replace the balance complete on a BFG 158 because the hairspring is distorted. Cousins has a choice of four:

Balance Complete, Brass Finger, BFG 58 794

Balance Complete, Jewelled Roller, BFG 58 793

Balance Complete, Pin Lever, Shockproof (793.1), BFG 58

Balance Complete, Pin Lever, Shockproof With Finger (794.1), BFG 58

 

The one on there now is not shockproof, but I've got a spare BFG 158 balance cock with shock spring, so I'm assuming I can just swap that in and get one of the latter two choices. The problem is, I don't know what a finger is.  Can anybody help?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Barnaby said:

I want to replace the balance complete on a BFG 158 because the hairspring is distorted. Cousins has a choice of four:

Balance Complete, Brass Finger, BFG 58 794

Balance Complete, Jewelled Roller, BFG 58 793

Balance Complete, Pin Lever, Shockproof (793.1), BFG 58

Balance Complete, Pin Lever, Shockproof With Finger (794.1), BFG 58

 

The one on there now is not shockproof, but I've got a spare BFG 158 balance cock with shock spring, so I'm assuming I can just swap that in and get one of the latter two choices. The problem is, I don't know what a finger is.  Can anybody help?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The balance with brass finger means the impulse "jewel" isn't a jewel but a smal metal protuberance that makes contact with the pallet fork. BFG made  1-jewel and 17 jewel varieties of the 158, and both manual and auto. If yours is a one-jewel, then get the balance with brass finger.You can swap out the hairsprings no problem, but if you try to swap the whole balance for the other, you'll also have to swap out out the pallet fork as well.  Otherwise it will hang up  and not run right. You cannot swap out a balance intended for a manual BFG 158 to an automatic because it will sti too low.

J

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, that's very helpful.

The movement I'm trying to fix is a hand-wind 17 jewel 158. It is not shockproof. I also have some spare parts from an automatic shockproof 158 (everything except a good hairspring). I would really like to "upgrade" to shockproof, mainly because with non- shockproof I have to totally dismantle the balance assembly to get to the cap jewel for cleaning and lubrication, and the stud doesn't have a screw. (That's how the hairspring got distorted in the first place).

So, can I get the Balance Complete, Pin Lever, Shockproof (793.1), BFG 58 , use the spare balance cock from the auto 158, and the pallets from the auto 158, and they will fit and work?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Barnaby said:

Thanks, that's very helpful.

The movement I'm trying to fix is a hand-wind 17 jewel 158. It is not shockproof. I also have some spare parts from an automatic shockproof 158 (everything except a good hairspring). I would really like to "upgrade" to shockproof, mainly because with non- shockproof I have to totally dismantle the balance assembly to get to the cap jewel for cleaning and lubrication, and the stud doesn't have a screw. (That's how the hairspring got distorted in the first place).

So, can I get the Balance Complete, Pin Lever, Shockproof (793.1), BFG 58 , use the spare balance cock from the auto 158, and the pallets from the auto 158, and they will fit and work?

 

I don't think so. The balance cock of the auto is considerably taller to clear the auto winding mechanism. Take a look at the manual:

1412095165_ScreenShot2019-05-01at10_56_02AM.png.1707bc4a6d7516e1e5c679cad684e730.png

and automatic:

1362247339_ScreenShot2019-05-01at10_58_29AM.png.3c3d3779408fb86e1169fda4a601fbae.png

It may be hard to see, but the balance cock is taller on automatic, necessitated by the automatic works bridge and one of the reversing gears.

J

Edited by noirrac1j
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from .
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
×
×
  • Create New...