Jump to content

Not Repair But Refinishing Advice.


ro63rto

Recommended Posts

Need some advice.

Scratched one of my favourite watches.

It has a vertically brushed finish top and polished sides.

Scratch

20141125_215702.jpg

Better pic of brushed finish

20141125_215602.jpg

I was thinking of using the "softest" side of a 4 step nail buffing pad but not sure if that's going to be too harsh.

Any guidance greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've made a couple of posts regarding refinishing, if you use the search facility you should find them.

Regarding your watch, I would suggest that you get hold of an old stainless watch case and polish it. Once you have polished it, experiment with different grades of fine wet or dry paper until you find the grade that matches the striations on your watch. Once you have found that, use the same paper to produce the finish on your watch. You must ensure that you apply the paper in the same direction as the original finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Geo. Thanks.

I did try a search but since I updated Tapatalk the other day it has been giving spurious results as well as a whole host of other problems.

I'll try and log in via a browser and find the post.

Your method of practising on an old bracelet makes sense.

Got lots of wet&dry grades since doing work on my car.

Thanks

Edited by ro63rto
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need some advice.

Scratched one of my favourite watches.

It has a vertically brushed finish top and polished sides.

I was thinking of using the "softest" side of a 4 step nail buffing pad but not sure if that's going to be too harsh.

Any guidance greatly appreciated.

 

The problem you may run into is matching the grain you currently have. The watch would originally have been finished with an abrasive wheel mounted on a motor and spinning at quite a speed. And this will be quite difficult to emulate with some emery paper, not impossible, but difficult.

 

Geo gave good advise regarding a practice piece. But when it comes to this watch I would think carefully as it will be easy to make it look worse as getting straight lines takes a lot of practice. Therefore, as mentioned, test piece is essential.

I would also be careful with the glass as the abrasive you use can actually scratch the glass as well. 

 

Nice watch by the way :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem you may run into is matching the grain you currently have. The watch would originally have been finished with an abrasive wheel mounted on a motor and spinning at quite a speed. And this will be quite difficult to emulate with some emery paper, not impossible, but difficult.

Geo gave good advise regarding a practice piece. But when it comes to this watch I would think carefully as it will be easy to make it look worse as getting straight lines takes a lot of practice. Therefore, as mentioned, test piece is essential.

I would also be careful with the glass as the abrasive you use can actually scratch the glass as well.

Nice watch by the way :)

Thanks. My brother liked it too back in 2004 when I bought it. Ended up buying him a mint one that had an alkaline cell. Seller thought it was faulty [emoji1] .

Because his is as new I now want to descratch mine.

I will definitely mask off the crystal before finally doing it.

Wonder if a dremel clamped into a vice with a suitable sanding flappy wheel would work better than a sheet of extremely fine wed&dry wrapped around a stiff sponge. I'd have to have a fence to one side to run it straight though.

Time to dig out some old spare bracelets.

Thanks Geo & Mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ro63rto,

 

I wouldn't recommend a dremel since the wheels are too small and the speed to high for a good control...at least that's my feel when I use it. In any case, to improve your chances here is a fixture you can use:

 

post-253-0-34862000-1416979135_thumb.jpg

 

Still, if you are to refinish it, I would recommend at least a 3 in. wheel (regular full size motor) and if possible some sort of hand vise to hold/guide the watch. Geo has some very useful tips in his finishing posts like for example, shaping a piece of wood to match the watch surface you will be sanding to guide the sand paper, etc. (check out his Seiko chronometer post too).

Edited by bobm12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Dremel definitely has its uses when grinding and polishing, but being power tool it is all too easy to wash away sharp edges and profiles. I do use one for some work with great care.

Here are a couple of links to posts that I made on refinishing.

http://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/443-titanium/

http://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/854-re-finishing-tip/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm always very conservative in my attitude to case and dial finishes, wear and tear, and so on. Part of this is born from my 50 years of using and dealing with guitars.

 

Working guitars, like working watches, will get wear and tear over the years. The edges can get dinged - knocked against chairs and tables - the surfaces can get scratched by fingernails, plectrums, belt buckles. scuffs and wear around the tuners and the tuning pegs at the other, etc., etc. So, the question arises: should the guitar perhaps be sanded down and refinished, re-lacquered? I think virtually every luthier I've known has said "No - clean off dirt if necessary - give it a clean and gentle polish if necessary - but don't mess with the natural patina of age".

 

I suppose that's why, with watches, I take a similar line. Things that we wear regularly will acquire the marks of that wear - unless, of course, we have major disasters, in which case more drastic action is called for. Looking at the pics of your watch, I see nothing that really needs to be done - and my pardon if the problem is worse in the flesh than in the photo!

 

I would accept the scratch rather than mess with the Natural History of the watch. Just my two-penn'orth...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will. Completely agree if its a vintage watch but this is a relatively modern one.

The main scratch is the horizontal line just outside the crystal at the 7 o'clock position in the first pic. There are lots of other smaller ones that can be seen in natural light too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...