Jump to content

Testing an automatic mainspring for slippage in a barrel


Recommended Posts

I have a Citizen 33J cal 5204 which is driving me nuts trying to get decent amplitude.

I'm pretty sure it's the mainspring slipping in the barrel. This is the procedure from the service manual -

Where it says 'Check the number of rotations by re-winding the mainspring' - does that mean letting down the mainspring ?

As the arbor has a slit in the top, it's easy to watch it. If I wind it about 10 rotations, then let the spring down, the arbor only turns about 1 revolution :huh:

I use Moebius 8217 on the barrel wall. I thought I might have used too much, so cleaned it and put very little on, and fitted a new mainspring.

Any ideas ?

Thanks

(the pic is the old spring before cleaning !)

Capture.PNG

WIN_20190216_15_57_51_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are testing it correctly I think. It sounds like the brake spring has set and become too curved. It needs to be straightened or even curved in the opposite direction so that it grips the outer wall of the barrel more tightly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

You are testing it correctly I think. It sounds like the brake spring has set and become too curved. It needs to be straightened or even curved in the opposite direction so that it grips the outer wall of the barrel more tightly.

It's a new spring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

Oh, sorry. I understood you had cleaned and re-used the old spring.

I did to start with, but as the amplitude was so poor, I fitted a new spring.

I wonder if the surface condition of the barrel wall could be the problem ?

I've been looking for a donor movement - but the 52**/54** movements aren't common.

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

something doesnt look right on the outer most coil. did you use a mainspring winder to install the MS? re-winding does mean letting it down i would think but how are you unwinding it? your not just simply releasing the click are you. 

ok this is what i suggest: take barrel out and remove lid. turn the arbor with a driver and watch the coils wind up, while keeping barrel between your fingers on a flat surface. you will see if its slipping right away.

NOW i think this IS your issue: if the mainspring starts to pop out as you are winding then thats most likely due to an improper install, and when the lid is on the coils are rubbing up against the barrel lid adding friction and resistance to the MS causing loss in the power which equals Low amplitude.

check that and get back to us

Edited by saswatch88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, saswatch88 said:

 

NOW i think this IS your issue: if the mainspring starts to pop out as you are winding then thats most likely due to an improper install, and when the lid is on the coils are rubbing up against the barrel lid adding friction and resistance to the MS causing loss in the power which equals Low amplitude.

check that and get back to us

Forgive this beginner question but what defines an improper instal?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, saswatch88 said:

something doesnt look right on the outer most coil. did you use a mainspring winder to install the MS? re-winding does mean letting it down i would think but how are you unwinding it? your not just simply releasing the click are you. 

ok this is what i suggest: take barrel out and remove lid. turn the arbor with a driver and watch the coils wind up, while keeping barrel between your fingers on a flat surface. you will see if its slipping right away.

NOW i think this IS your issue: if the mainspring starts to pop out as you are winding then thats most likely due to an improper install, and when the lid is on the coils are rubbing up against the barrel lid adding friction and resistance to the MS causing loss in the power which equals Low amplitude.

check that and get back to us

I agree the spring doesn't look right in that pic. There were signs that it had been rubbing on the barrel lid.  One reason I changed it was the height was 1.1 mm, whereas the original spec shows 1.2 mm

I do use a spring winder, though as these wind the 'wrong way' I have to wind it in to the next smaller winder, then transfer it to the correct size to get it the right way round.

I unwind it by releasing the click whilst controlling the crown in my fingers.

I agree it's a good idea to remove the lid and watch it wind, though the slot in the arbor isn't deep enough for a screwdriver, so I'll have to try and use a pin vice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Lc130 said:

Forgive this beginner question but what defines an improper instal?

Correct question LC,  I wonder if there is a correct lesson , put out by a reputable school or manufacturer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

I agree the spring doesn't look right in that pic. There were signs that it had been rubbing on the barrel lid.  One reason I changed it was the height was 1.1 mm, whereas the original spec shows 1.2 mm

I do use a spring winder, though as these wind the 'wrong way' I have to wind it in to the next smaller winder, then transfer it to the correct size to get it the right way round.

I unwind it by releasing the click whilst controlling the crown in my fingers.

I agree it's a good idea to remove the lid and watch it wind, though the slot in the arbor isn't deep enough for a screwdriver, so I'll have to try and use a pin vice.

wind the wrong way? then you just wind the spring into the winder in the opposite side going clockwise or counter clockwise. and transferring it to correct size do you mean going from smaller winder to larger winder?  when you say size do you mean size of the arbor on the winder so the hole end is shaped right? if thats the case then that should not dictate wether you use a smaller winder. you should select your winder based on the size of the barrel not the arbor. most mainsprings dont have the correct shape at the end to fit the arbor in the watch, so you have to shape it. you can use a pair of wire beading pliers to shape the hole end once its in the barrel. some of these pliers are made of nylon so you dont have to worry about marking or burring the mainspring or barrel.

also if there was a 1.1 in there before and you replaced it with a 1.2 now your seeing signs of rubbing then i would say there was a reason it may have had the 1.1. and you should replace it with the same.

LAST NOTE: SEE MY PIC

looking at the picture it looks as if the notch on the wall of the barrel is at the bottom and the break is against it coming from its left side, and then looking at the hole end its in the clockwise direction. if iam right on my observation then the MS has been installed in the wrong direction, hence the slipping. the MS should wind in the opposite direction of the notch on the barrel wall. as you can see with may arrows that there is nothing stopping the MS from sliding against the wall of the barrel.

WIN_20190216_15_57_51_Pro.thumb.jpg.e6ed8194173b50f890e3426a8e357ef9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the spring is broken, that's just the bridle overlapping itself and is normal.

If you try to wind a spring in a barrel with the lid off, the coils WILL jump out. It's not a sign of a deformed spring. And it's a common method to get "backwards" springs in to use a winder one size too small, and transfer to the proper winder then barrel. And if original is 1.2mm high, it's pretty certain that's the correct height. Many barrels will show signs of rubbing after years of use, see above about coils jumping out. The lid and barrel bottom keep them in, they rub.

 

As to the slipping issue, it is probably a combination of a worn barrel wall and incorrect grease. The 8217 is from the old Glissalube line, which changed designation to fit the numerical system Moebius uses. The 8213 (old Glissalube A) is strong braking, recommended for brass barrels. The 8212 (old Glissalube B ) is weak braking and recommened for aluminum barrels. The 8217 (old Glissalube 20) is considered "normal" braking but Moebius lists it as "soft" for all barrels.

Some auto barrels have notches around the wall, some are smooth. Both can get worn to where they slip too easily. If it's your own watch, a rub around the inside with rough emery paper may do the trick. Going to a more "braky" grease could do it too. Maybe both, maybe you just need a new barrel and the more braky grease.

glissalube.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

I don't think the spring is broken, that's just the bridle overlapping itself and is normal.

If you try to wind a spring in a barrel with the lid off, the coils WILL jump out. It's not a sign of a deformed spring. And it's a common method to get "backwards" springs in to use a winder one size too small, and transfer to the proper winder then barrel. And if original is 1.2mm high, it's pretty certain that's the correct height. Many barrels will show signs of rubbing after years of use, see above about coils jumping out. The lid and barrel bottom keep them in, they rub.

 

As to the slipping issue, it is probably a combination of a worn barrel wall and incorrect grease. The 8217 is from the old Glissalube line, which changed designation to fit the numerical system Moebius uses. The 8213 (old Glissalube A) is strong braking, recommended for brass barrels. The 8212 (old Glissalube B ) is weak braking and recommened for aluminum barrels. The 8217 (old Glissalube 20) is considered "normal" braking but Moebius lists it as "soft" for all barrels.

Some auto barrels have notches around the wall, some are smooth. Both can get worn to where they slip too easily. If it's your own watch, a rub around the inside with rough emery paper may do the trick. Going to a more "braky" grease could do it too. Maybe both, maybe you just need a new barrel and the more braky grease.

 

The barrel wall doesn't look too bad, a bit worn and smooth. I'll try to get a replacement barrel and some 8213.

WIN_20190407_14_46_43_Pro.jpg

WIN_20190407_14_47_45_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree with any test, wind, count with lid off and barrel in open.

MS can come out flying and hurt someone.

I grease or whatever you want to do, instal the barrel with retaining bridge and ratchet wheel screwed on.

-- wind through the ratchet say with your screw driver, listen close for the sound of power discharge from the barrel (it will discharge at some point). You want to count the number turns on the ratchet wheel so mark a dot on the wheel and count the number of turn the dot goes by.

Dispower the barrel fully, wind again, stop winding just short of the number you counted before power discharge.

Let the watch run on bench and note how long it runs to stop. 

That is the actual power reserve your watch retains.

The main advantage of this approach is, that you can still see with your eyes. Both of them.:lol:

Regards

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NUCE i do wind test with lid off all the time, if the barrel is secured  and arbor tightly gripped while winding then it will not pop out unless the spring is badly warped and you dont keep a tight grip on the barrel. i grip from the sides of barrel and allow the edge of my fingertips to rest over the edge of the barrel on top of the spring ensuring it wont come out. it is the best way to see what going on under the hood in my opinion and saves on the guessing games and i never had one jump out on me.

NICKEL i have to both agree and disagree with popping up  of the spring. usually when i observe the spring with lid off it will pop up a bit due to the hook on the arbor being a tiny bit higher than the center of the hole in the end. but it should never come out any higher than the arbor for that would mean excessive rubbing and friction on the lid. nor should the spring be coning up at the "un-winded" rest position. it should lay perfectly flat which it seems to do in the pics. usually it will only take a few rotations of the spring to see this and can be stopped before spring pops out. 

these pliers work wonders when it comes to shaping the hole end of the spring. ALSO did anyone look at the picture i attached in my last post does anyone agree that it looks like the MS is installed in the wrong direction?? when compared to pics of barrels i just attaches you can see they are all winding in the opposite direction of the notch and break

 

pl8564-nylon-jaw-pliers-round-nose.jpg

rolex-factory-spares-7822-7825-7827-barrel-bridge-part-main-spring-complete-barrel-cal-automatics-1520-1530-1560-1570.jpg

mainspring.jpg.b23d915ad4ea420532ae5ecf95ae3b26.jpg

Mainspring-and-Barrel-JimInOz-voa-omegaforums-.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sas if you can fully wind an auto spring with the cap off and observe the slipping action without the spring jumping out you have almost certainly made a deal at the crossroads so I won't argue with you.

Do keep up though, the OP was clear that this spring goes in opposite of conventional, i.e. cap is on the top not the bottom. Thus using two winders, as most are designed with arbors to wind conventional springs, and also why bergeon makes winder sets with both right and left hand arbors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Sas if you can fully wind an auto spring with the cap off and observe the slipping action without the spring jumping out you have almost certainly made a deal at the crossroads so I won't argue with you.

Do keep up though, the OP was clear that this spring goes in opposite of conventional, i.e. cap is on the top not the bottom. Thus using two winders, as most are designed with arbors to wind conventional springs, and also why bergeon makes winder sets with both right and left hand arbors.

i understand that he said it was opposite of conventional, but that doesnt matter. the spring should still wind opposite the notch/lip in the barrel no matter what the direction is. if it doesnt then there is nothing stopping the spring from sliding around the barrel walls when winding.

and i dont fully wind it that would be a difficult task 100%, i just go about 1-5 turns. in that amount of turns you can tell if MS is warped and within the first turn you see if its slipping off the arbor.

Edited by saswatch88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i understand that he said it was opposite of conventional, but that doesnt matter. the spring should still wind opposite the notch/lip in the barrel no matter what the direction is. if it doesnt then there is nothing stopping the spring from sliding around the barrel walls when winding.
and i dont fully wind it that would be a difficult task 100%, i just go about 1-5 turns. in that amount of turns you can tell if MS is warped and within the first turn you see if its slipping off the arbor.
It's automatic, right in the title. The gap you see is the bridle overlapping as it should do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

It's automatic, right in the title. The gap you see is the bridle overlapping as it should do.

yes but again there has to be something in the barrel for the bridle to lean against to stop it. Right mainspring, properly oiled and installed yet still slipping. so what it is then? 

OP can you please take a pic of the barrel without the MS installed. thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes but again there has to be something in the barrel for the bridle to lean against to stop it. Right mainspring, properly oiled and installed yet still slipping. so what it is then? 

OP can you please take a pic of the barrel without the MS installed. thanks

Have you ever worked on an automatic watch?

The whole thread is about the spring slipping prematurely, which, as explained above, can be due to numerous issues and some barrels have 6 or so notches (which are radiused) some are smooth. OP has smooth. It has worn through the original plating, showing brass. Moebius has a braking grease just for brass, which is incidentally their "strong" braking grease. It's all in the thread.

 

OP also posted a pic of barrel without spring already btw.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Have you ever worked on an automatic watch?

The whole thread is about the spring slipping prematurely, which, as explained above, can be due to numerous issues and some barrels have 6 or so notches (which are radiused) some are smooth. OP has smooth. It has worn through the original plating, showing brass. Moebius has a braking grease just for brass, which is incidentally their "strong" braking grease. It's all in the thread.

 

OP also posted a pic of barrel without spring already btw.

 

UM yes i have. many of them. mostly ETA and seiko, never a citizen though. and i do know some older automatics have smooth barrels and rely only on the bridle for slipping. vintage Seikos for example has a smooth barrel. modern automatics such as ETA 7750 are notched and i dont see photo of empty barrel i just see a pic of broken file. and I never said I was right, it was an observation i made in order to give a possible solution. the photo i posted with red arrows is what looks like a notch in the barrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, saswatch88 said:

vintage Seikos for example has a smooth barrel.

Even current ones do have the same. So far it has been a dogma that the MS of an automatic mov.t has to slip virtually unhindered in the barrel, probably for fear that continued stress would break it something. However Nomos has now introduce in its DUW 601 a "rotor brake" system, that to say, no slipping anymore.

https://www.watchtime.com/featured/nomos-caliber-duw-neomatik-6101/

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As @nickelsilver pointed out, the barrel has worn through the nickel plating to brass. 

I therefore plan to change the barrel, when I can find a replacement - there are some NOS on ebay but I don't know the part number. Anyone got a reference to Citizen parts lists? I have the technical/service manuals but can't find any parts list.

With a replacement barre l+ new spring + 8213, I should hopefully get decent amplitude !  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As [mention=4990]nickelsilver[/mention] pointed out, the barrel has worn through the nickel plating to brass. 
I therefore plan to change the barrel, when I can find a replacement - there are some NOS on ebay but I don't know the part number. Anyone got a reference to Citizen parts lists? I have the technical/service manuals but can't find any parts list.
With a replacement barre l+ new spring + 8213, I should hopefully get decent amplitude !  
 
Haha weeelll in my experience low amplitude is rarely due to the mainspring. But you did have the wrong height and the thickness could have been off a bit too, just 0.005mm makes a big difference.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Haha weeelll in my experience low amplitude is rarely due to the mainspring. But you did have the wrong height and the thickness could have been off a bit too, just 0.005mm makes a big difference.

I'm pinning my hopes on it being the mainspring. I've examined every jewel/pivot under the microscope - the gear train runs beautifully, (tried all individually and together) as does the new balance (nothing touching). The pallet/jewels look good. Had it stripped down about 6 times trying to find the cause !  

Currently showing just 215 deg.

Out of interest I looked up the coefficient of frictions (sliding) for brass and nickel :

nickel to mild steel is 0.64,  brass to mild steel  0.44  (couldn't find numbers for spring steel)

So when the nickel wears through, the friction drops about 30%

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Couple of things H. There surely seems to be a reoccurring fluctuation pattern  of somewhere around every 5 minutes. More noticable with your crown left trace having a large peak gradually reducing to 2 small peaks and troughs then back up to another large peak. Nev posted a download link to a book by Harold Kelly not so long back that i started to read while i was away. There was a good section on wheel and pinion ratios, rotation periods of wheels of different beat frequencies that's worth a read. Then something that bugs me comparing the amplitude and timing rate changes with your dial up trace which i chose to avoid wheel imbalances . The amplitude fluctuates by an extreme of 30 ° and the rate fluctuates by an extreme of 21 seconds as per your reading. In normal circumstances a movement dropping its power over the course of the mainspring unwinding, a hairspring acting isochronical will maintain its rate almost to the end of the power reserve. Similarly power wound into a movement increasing its amplitude from 265° to 295° a hairspring again acting isochronical will again maintain its rate aside from a brief few moments until it settles into it's rate. From that it seems to me that because the amplitude difference isn't big enough to affect a rate change then the amplitude fluctuation cause is not coming from anywhere but from the balance. So its whatever is causing the rate to change increase and decrease within the balance is also slowing and speeding up the hairspring swings. I'm not quite sure if I've just gone around in circles with that, it made sense to me when i started  😅
    • somewhere in the universe although as I'm answering this I remembered which discussion group. Somebody had a similar question loss basically expanded it to the watch would totally disintegrate in my think like 30 years. I'd have to go back and find the original discussion if I can the person seem to think that they hairspring would disintegrate like you describe and just metal on metal wearing out the entire watch. Except of course we all work on watches over 30 years and they obviously do not disintegrate. Plus somebody came along and explained why hairsprings do not have the same issues as mainsprings. Although hairsprings do end up with watchmakers insisting on bending and playing with them and torturing them etc. and that obviously is not good for the metal at all. one of the problems that you're having here it is what is the purpose of the test that started this discussion? Let me go and snip out the original image as you can see from images above this watch is horrible. Or is it? What is the purpose of the images up above in other words what exactly would use this test for? The real purpose this test is show the effect of amplitude on timekeeping. Or specifically you're looking for mechanical issues that are causing fluctuations in amplitude which unfortunately shows up  with timekeeping. or basically everything affects timekeeping but amplitude is affected by the mechanical characteristics of the watch from the mainspring to the balance wheel and unfortunately as it's a mechanical watch your always going to have power fluctuations. so how do we rule out unacceptable fluctuations versus the natural characteristic of the watch? Usually if you can find a repeating pattern you can narrow it down to the offending components for instance I'm attaching a PDF. on the second page of the PDF it talks about 21st-century equipment versus paper tape timing machines. Then they give an example of timing problems solely caused by a faulty component. although off you have a user's manual for a paper tape machine it does explain that you can find faulty components by looking at the variations on your paper tape seeing how often they repeat and do the same thing without the fancy software. Even though it was claimed that you couldn't do that in other words you couldn't find a pattern? One of the problems that comes up with modern LCD-based timing machines versus software is limited screen size. In other words it makes it very hard to look for patterns you'll see variations in numbers but it's hard to tell what's going on which is why the display above is really nice to see if there is a problem. for instance here's a paper printout from a witschi timing machine it does look distorted because I changed the speed at which the image would move across the screen. In other words I was trying to figure out a way to extend the screen to being much longer as I was looking for a pattern as you can see there doesn't appear to be a pattern at all so basically we end up with a watch that I cannot time at all they cannot really figure out what the problem is and I actually cannot find a pattern even begin the figure out where the problem might be. Plus I agreed to service this watch for free as I was going to use it for the purposes of a lecture. In other words it's a nice railroad grade pocket watch and I wanted to show before how horrible amplitude is and how wonderful it looks after serviced and after servicing it looked exactly the same still horrible. Then I used software for a clock timing machine and came up with this interesting image one a minor problems we have with time plots and  how they look is that they all do things a little bit differently. So this was occurring approximately every five minutes. Then we need another chart then I replaced something in the watch and we now get this one of the things that I was always bothered with was if I had put the hands on after servicing would the watch have Time? Because the pattern was repeating the watch would average that out may  it would have Time. Oh and what did I change somebody had swapped the mainspring barrel for something different were getting a binding between the mainspring in the center wheel pinion. so the problem you're having is what exactly is the problem? the purpose of the test image is to look for mechanical problems causing amplitude problems. Because it's a mechanical watch your always going to have variations so are the variations in this watch abnormal or normal for this watch? Once we eliminate the mechanical issues beyond it's a mechanical watch then you can work on timing issues. for timing issues I recommend going back to the normal display that were used to and make sure you have your averaging times set correctly. In other words while the graphical display is basically real time years of the numbers are averaged over time. Anywhere from 20 to 40 seconds depending upon whose specs you're looking at. So basically they will average out the problems were seeing on this time plot.   one of my amusements with students that go to the same school is that you have different instructors. So this gives you different experiences like what exactly is tight anyway as I don't remember any thing like this? Then did you know that Rolex at least in Geneva as I visited their service center replace all the screws in the watch every time they service the watch. then why did they do that because they use power screwdrivers and tighten those things down as tight as you can get them which has a problem. How many times can you tighten screw down really tight before the hints break off. So they replace the screws every single time. So personally I don't think they have to be so tight that you're in danger snapping head off that's too tight in my opinion. but the screws definitely shouldn't be falling out either which I've occasionally see and where people just don't tighten their screws tight enough.   Horologica Times -- May 2004 From the Workshop witschi time plot.pdf
    • I guess it is a possibility, but the train wheel bridge was pressed down all the way so I'm not so sure. Then again, the screws weren't tightened at all (imagine being screwed down all the way but using a piece of Rodico instead of a screwdriver). Anyway, the movement is now fully stripped so we'll have to see once I've assembled it again. BTW I found the post where @nickelsilver wrote about tightening screws: As he writes: "In school, if your screws aren't tight, like you think they might snap, you get your movement tossed in the sawdust box!" I'm really curious to know why it is so important to tighten the screws that hard. I usually stop when it feels like there is no chance the screw can start to unscrew itself. Also, screwing down that hard requires perfectly dressed and perfectly sized screwdrivers to avoid slippage and/or damaging the screw slot.
    • This place has them, cheaper than I saw on ebay and they appear to be a legitimate supplier: https://maddisonsofdurham.co.uk/watch-parts/capacitors/seiko-batteries-capacitors/seiko-capacitor-kinetic-30235mz-tc920s-5m42-5m22-5m23-battery-3023-5mz-3023-5my/?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw7-SvBhB6EiwAwYdCASmviGb9G2ZGW3CtcUZBkNgglcgfPKoqnpOzrzruiPtm69f6DX7UGhoCKl4QAvD_BwE There is also a note at the bottom of the page about them being a newer type, with a slightly different part number.  
    • Are we ignoring  that another watch on tg showed similar rate fluctuation. Did I miss any conclusion made on this sigificant  point ?    Springs have high fatigue threshold,   meaning angle of  bend/distortion  has to be very sharp to cause material fatigue .  An evidence to this point is the bend we form at end of terminal curve or the bend at the collet,  are we causing fatigue there? definately not.       
×
×
  • Create New...